Repository navigation
Notes two choices the prefix change made - #269
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Appends a dated foot Note to ADR-0003. The reserved-prefix Amendment of 2026-09-29 opens with the operator's ruling, and that sentence reads as covering the whole Amendment. Two choices in it were the change's own, not the ruling's: giving the suite's nested modules the Conformance prefix, and recording the contract as an Amendment of this record. The Note attributes both to the change that carries the Amendment, as the 2026-10-04 Note did for the aliases paragraph. Ruled by the operator, 2026-10-06. Zero removed lines; no status change. Docs only: the diff touches no gated path, so there is no gate to run.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Appends a dated foot Note to ADR-0003 that attributes two choices in the reserved-prefix Amendment of 2026-09-29 to the change that carried it, not to the operator's ruling the Amendment opens with:
Conformanceprefix (RetiringSerializationandReentrantSerializationbecameConformanceRetiringSerializationandConformanceReentrantSerialization);The Note follows the 2026-10-04 Note, which did the same for the aliases paragraph. That a dated Note carries the attribution was ruled by the operator, 2026-10-06. No status line changes; no decision changes.
Direction check of the record text
Every claim was read on
origin/mainat60808e0. The quoted opening sentence "Ruled by the operator, 2026-09-29." and the paragraph heading "One reserved prefix." are verbatim in the Amendment. The 2026-10-04 Note records that the opening sentence does not cover the aliases paragraph and that the ruling set the reserved prefix and its moduledoc statement as the host's contract. The nested module names before the change are those atc720da0(StatifierPersistence.Testing.StorageConformance, theusingblock), and after it those on main in the same block.20fb8bbis the commit that carries the Amendment, the prefix and the new nested module names, and is an ancestor ofmain; the conformance module has no commit after it on main, so the moduledoc sentence giving nested modules theConformancespelling is unchanged.git diff origin/main -- docs/adr/shows zero removed lines; the Note sits at the foot, after the 2026-10-04 Note.Gate
Docs only: the diff touches only
docs/adr/, outside the gated paths (lib/,test/,config/,mix.exs,mix.lock), so there is no local gate to run under this repo's rule for a change touching no Elixir code. CI runs the full quality gate on the request. No changelog fragment:changelog.d/README.mdexcludes ADRs.Bead: sp-zwjt