docs(pm-dispatch): a triage direction landing in an adjudicated area quotes the governing line

[claude]

Fixes #17497

One rule line in 〈分诊座位职责〉 of .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md: a triage grading whose direction lands inside an adjudicated area (an ADR, a ruled card, a not-re-adjudicable rule) pastes the governing line — the Prior rulings read: line that check-prior-rulings.mjs prints — or names no target. Triage keeps writing directions (「写方向」 is charter text); the line binds the direction's evidence, never removes the direction.

Governed surface (.claude/**, rules layer): draft, no reviewer requested, no ready flip — the skills seat hangs the four-piece and the maintainer lands it. REGION claim :306–:415 only; PR #18242 holds :172–:185 and PR #18250 holds :645–:646 on the same file and neither range is touched here (the seat merges origin/main at landing).

The added line (SKILL.md :339 on the head, 120 bytes)

- 方向落在 ADR/已裁卡/不可重裁规则:贴 `check-prior-rulings.mjs` 的 `Prior rulings read:` 行,或不点。

Vocabulary is the corpus's own: 「已裁卡」 (SKILL.md 〈家族派发〉), 「不可重裁」 (〈派发词三分区〉), 「落点」 = the named fix target (〈分诊座位职责〉's pm:queue definition). The tool is cited by file name and the paste line by its literal prefix — no issue or PR number (check:pm-skill-id-lint green).

Placement (P2, chosen by reading the section's order): directly under the line that mandates the direction — 「裁定写方向、给六态之一」 (:338 on the head, :339 on origin/main). That is where 「写方向」 actually lives on this tree: references/lanes/triage.md is 7 lines and its :7 is the half-state rule, so the grading's citation of 「写方向」 at triage.md :7 is stale as a location while its substance holds. The English audit comment line (Triage: lands in …; rationale: …, :364 on the head) was the alternative; it names the artifact the direction is written into, but the obligation reads best beside the mandate it qualifies, and 「方向」 is anchored by the preceding line there.

P1 confirmed by a live run (node scripts/pm/check-prior-rulings.mjs --card 17497, exit 0) — the tool printed exactly the shape the line cites:

Prior rulings read: triage,gradings,named,target,governing,itself,rejects,grading,quotes,line,adjudication,routes → 61 hits; ADR-0129 D4, ADR-0067 D3, ADR-0076 D11, ADR-0006 D2, ADR-0020 D2, ADR-0021 D1

formatPasteLine (check-prior-rulings.mjs) prints Prior rulings read: TERMS → N hits; ADR-xxxx Dn|none and the whole-line form Prior rulings read: unresolved when the search did not run; check-half-states.mjs H62 reads the same key (PRIOR_RULINGS_KEY), and references/decision-analysis.md already binds that line for decision cards.

Payment (P3, measured) — one adjacent pair inside the region rewritten tighter

Before (origin/main :311 + :312, 89 B + 50 B):

- fire 开局只按名加载互斥检查所需工具,`ToolSearch` 用 `select:` 形式。
- 判定本轮有活之后才加载其余工具。

After (head :311, 116 B):

- fire 开局只按名加载互斥检查所需工具,`ToolSearch` 用 `select:`;判定本轮有活才加载其余。

Nothing operative is lost: every instruction token survives — fire 开局, 只按名加载, 互斥检查所需工具, ToolSearch, select:, 判定本轮有活, the ordering 才加载其余 — and the three dropped words are filler (「形式」 names the code span it follows; 「之后才」 → 「才」 keeps the only-after ordering; 「其余工具」 → 「其余」 in a line whose subject is tool loading). The PM's measured pairs (:312+:314, :363+:364, :397+:398) all rewrite past 120 B; this is the pair that fits. Not a re-wrap (no line-joining bought the budget), no rule deleted, ceiling untouched.

Reverse verification (on head c96b507d)

• git diff origin/main -- .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md: two hunks, @@ -308,8 +308,7 @@ (the fold) and @@ -337,6 +336,7 @@ (the insert) — both inside :306–:415; no other line moves.
• wc -l = 812 (ceiling 812, headroom 0 — the ratchet's own line: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md is 812 lines (ceiling 812; headroom 0)).
• sed -n '734,755p' | md5sum = 3327d02c56f8a0eca88569dad2270f32 (frame block byte-identical).
• an awk length scan for lines longer than 120 bytes over :306–:415 prints nothing; touched lines measure 116 B (fold) and 120 B (new).
• Positive anchors: grep -c 'Prior rulings read:' = 1; the removed :312 text = 0 hits; the fold text = 1 hit.

Gates (derived, run in the foreground, exits captured before any pipe, reconciled with --ran)

node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack (no paths; change set derived off merge base cb648cb1) → 16 commands; --ran verdict: 16 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 16 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (a DERIVED zero — all 16 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3), exit 0.

command	exit
node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs	0
node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs --self-test	0
node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs	0
node scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs --self-test	0
pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions	first run exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET (unbuilt @objectstack/formula / @objectstack/lint) — built both under os-verify-lock.sh (VERDICT command-exit 0), re-ran: 0
pnpm check:agent-test-spelling	0
pnpm check:doc-authoring	0
pnpm check:driver-memory-census	0
pnpm check:nul-bytes	0
pnpm check:pm-governed-merges	0
pnpm check:pm-governed-prose	0 (2 instruction surface(s) name all 5 registered governed surfaces)
pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint	0 (27 file(s) clean)
pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet	0 (812/812)
pnpm check:refd-timer-probe	0
pnpm check:skill-frame-sync	0 (the one declared copy of the decision frame is internally coherent)
pnpm check:watch-hint-literal	0

Extra, outside the roster: node scripts/check-skill-frame-freshness.mjs --self-test exit 0 and --no-fetch exit 0 (the decision frame in this tree is current with refs/remotes/origin/main). The roster did not derive check:pm-dispatch-gates, so no detached run was owed. Full repo-level scans (pnpm lint) belong to CI.

skip-changeset: .claude/** is published by no package's files[] (fast track) — nothing released moves.

Acceptance notes

• noted, not filed: the grading's location citation for 「写方向」 (lanes/triage.md :7) is stale — that file's :7 is the half-state rule and the charter text lives at SKILL.md :339 on origin/main; the ruling's substance is unaffected. 承接者: the skills seat, at landing of this PR.
• noted, not filed: the dispatch names a gate check:pm-skill-frame-sync; the script's real name is check:skill-frame-sync (scripts/check-skill-frame-sync.mjs), and it ran green. 承接者: the dispatching PM seat, via this report.
• noted, not filed: the ratchet header's reading 「of the file's 601 adjacent bullet pairs ZERO merge under the 120-byte cap」 was a pure-join measurement on an earlier tree; on this tree one pair folds at 116 B as a tighter rewrite. Not a contradiction of that reading and not a defect. 承接者:无.

维护者速读(草稿)

改了什么:分诊座位职责里加一行:分诊的方向若落在 ADR、已裁卡或不可重裁规则内,须贴 check-prior-rulings.mjs 印出的 Prior rulings read: 行,否则不点落点。为了不突破 812 行上限,把开局工具加载的两行合成一行(116 字节),每条指令原样保留。

为什么改:两次分诊给出的落点恰是治理文本已经拒绝的拼写或形状(一次是字段 schema 拒收的扁平拼写,一次是标记为不可重裁的通则),都在执行席的围栏才被拦下,其中一次派发令已写出。分诊的推理没错,错在落点没有引治理行,所以看不见。决策卡那边已有同一行的约束,这次把它也绑到分诊评级上。

风险与代价(含回滚):一行规则、一次同义压缩,不动上限、不删规则、不改工具。风险是新行 120 字节写得紧,读者需要认得 check-prior-rulings.mjs 这个工具(它已在仓内、有自检)。回滚 = revert 本 PR 一次提交。

席位意见:(留空,席位定稿成评论)

你要做的:确认这条规则的措辞与落位(放在「裁定写方向」那一行之下);同意即批准本 PR,由席位落地。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

Contract review

Served-tier: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER
Head-sha: c96b507db288c20bf270c66c6137dc6fa7e79576

Reviewing seat: domain:skills, in-seat review at the contract-review tier — get_session read at 2026-09-15T04:30Z: configured_model = session_context.model = last_served_model, the constant's tier, no fallback notice this round. Card #17497, claim 5674587337, report 5674736229; Clause-②: no on the claim and in the PR body.

① Derived judgments

• Accept set / public surface: none moves — .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md (+2/−2) against merge-base cb648cb1; nothing published; skip-changeset on the PR (read back with documentation, size/xs).
• Region: two hunks, @@ -308,8 +308,7 @@ (the payment) and @@ -337,6 +336,7 @@ (the insert), both inside the claimed REGION :306–:415; :172–:185 (PR pm-dispatch: reconcile the quota rows with the identity-bound rate limit; merged-write rule; account-suspension recovery readings #18242) and :645–:646 (PR docs(agents): the contract-review carrier is the seat's to hang; --pair PR-NUMBER is the only spelling #18250) byte-identical to origin/main on the head, seat-diffed. The added line (:339 on the head, 120 B) reads 「方向落在 ADR/已裁卡/不可重裁规则:贴 check-prior-rulings.mjs 的 Prior rulings read: 行,或不点。」 directly under the mandate 「裁定写方向、给六态之一」 — the direction stays, its evidence is bound, exactly the grading's ruling; the tool is cited by file name and the paste line by its literal prefix (P1 measured by a live run: --card 17497 printed that shape, exit 0).
• Payment: origin/main :311 (89 B) + :312 (50 B) rewritten as one 116 B line — every operative token kept (fire 开局 · 只按名加载互斥检查所需工具 · ToolSearch · select: · 判定本轮有活 · the only-after order 才加载其余); the three dropped words are filler (形式 / 之后 / 工具), seat-read against the before text. No rule deleted, ceiling untouched.
• Ratchets on the head, seat-run in a detached worktree at c96b507: 812/812 ✓ (check-skill-line-ratchet), check:pm-skill-id-lint clean ✓, check-skill-frame-sync ✓, check-governed-prose ✓, frame block :734–:755 md5 3327d02c56f8a0eca88569dad2270f32 unchanged ✓; awk length over :306–:415 prints no line over 120 B ✓; check-clause2-carriers --pair 18256 exit 0 on this head.
• Gates 16 / 16 / 0 / 0 per the report with exits captured by redirect (doc-formula-expressions after its prerequisite build under the verify lock); check:pm-dispatch-gates not derived for this diff.

② Semver level

Not applicable — nothing published moves; skip-changeset measured (.claude/** is on the fast path).

③ Boundary flags

open_questions: none. Three declared deviations, each answered: (1) the dispatch spelled the frame-sync gate check:pm-skill-frame-sync; the real script is check:skill-frame-sync and it ran green — the seat's spelling error, recorded; (2) the commit carries the model-free trailer pair, correct; (3) branched from cb648cb1 after origin/main advanced — no SKILL.md or check-prior-rulings.mjs change in between, line numbers unchanged. Premise correction the dev made and the seat owns publicly: the grading 5624180621 located 「写方向」 at references/lanes/triage.md :7, but that 7-line file's :7 is the half-state rule; the charter text lives at SKILL.md :339 on origin/main (:338 on the head) — location only, substance unaffected. Governed (rules layer) ⇒ four-piece: needs-user-decision on the PR, 速读终稿 below, reviews requested; ⛔ not flipped ready by the seat before an authorized approval. Serial: PR #18242 and PR #18250 are disjoint regions of the same file; the last of the three to land merges origin/main first. Out of scope, recorded: the ratchet header's 「601 adjacent bullet pairs ZERO merge under the 120-byte cap」 was a pure-join reading — a tighter rewrite can still fit, as here; no card.

Implemented-by: claude/issue-17497-grading-quotes-the-governing-line
Reviewed-by: session_01HZfg2AwVX191qCizp88gQr

VERDICT: PASS

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

维护者速读(终稿)

改了什么:SKILL.md〈分诊座位职责〉加一行(:339,120 字节):分诊定级的「方向」若落在 ADR、已裁卡或不可重裁规则里,必须贴上 check-prior-rulings.mjs 打印的 Prior rulings read: 那一行,否则就不点具体落点。为保持 812 行天花板,把同一节相邻两行(fire 开局只按名加载工具 / 判定有活才加载其余)合成一行 116 字节,每个操作性词都在。

为什么改:两次分诊(#16867、#17425)方向对、落点错——落点正是治理文本明文拒收的拼法或形状,直到执行席重读 ADR 才发现,其中一次派发令都已写出。原因不是前提过时,而是没有任何一行要求定级引用它所针对的裁决行。工具与粘贴行早就存在(决策卡已被要求贴它),这一行把同一义务绑到定级的方向上。

风险与代价(含回滚):纯规则文本,不碰发布包、不改 CI、行数不变;分诊仍可写方向(「写方向」是章程),只是多贴一行证据。回滚 = revert 一个 PR。一处纠正:原定级把「写方向」出处写成 lanes/triage.md :7,实际在 SKILL.md 本节,dev 已在 PR 正文当众更正,结论不受影响。

席位意见:建议批准。本席在 head 上亲核:两处改动都在认领区域 :306–:415 内、其他两个在飞 PR 的区域字节不变;新行 120 字节、付费行 116 字节且语义无损;棘轮 812/812、frame 块 md5 不变、id-lint / frame-sync / governed-prose 绿;--pair 0。CI 在 head 上跑中(Lint & Repo Gates),绿后才由本席按裁决 C 落地;与 PR #18242、#18250 同文件不同区域,最后落地者先合 main。

你要做的(一个动作):approve 本 PR。approve 后本席翻 ready + 入队。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

Ruling-C landing provenance — skills seat, session session_01HZfg2AwVX191qCizp88gQr, 2026-09-15T06:14Z. Authorized approval: os-zhuang's APPROVED review 5206139389 at 2026-09-15T06:08Z on head c96b507db288c20bf270c66c6137dc6fa7e79576, the same head the review of record 5674761187 (## Contract review PASS) names and the ACCEPT 5674761572 on #17497 cites; not dismissed. The approver also flipped the PR ready (2026-09-15T06:08Z) and enqueued it (added_to_merge_queue 2026-09-15T06:08Z, actor os-zhuang; its queue ref had not yet appeared at 2026-09-15T06:13Z, the entry being behind PRs #18242, #18244 and #18250 — the event is the reading, the ref is re-read at the landing confirmation), so the seat's remaining acts under ruling C are the readings and the label: check-clause2-carriers --pair 18256 exit 0 re-read at 2026-09-15T06:13Z with the C6-RECORD note naming that record; on that head Lint & Repo Gates and TypeScript Type Check both success and every other check is success or skipped (35 runs: 19 success, 16 skipped); mergeable_state clean, no main commit touching SKILL.md since the merge-base, so no branch update was made (the queue builds the merge); needs-user-decision cleared through label-write.mjs and read back. Serial note: PRs #18242 (:172–:185) and #18250 (:645–:646) share SKILL.md in disjoint regions and sit ahead in the same queue; the ratchet stays 812/812 through all three. MERGED is confirmed later by two readings (the queue ref gone + git log origin/main carrying (#18256) with one parent), then #17497's residue is stripped and #18218 (SKILL.md :622) is unblocked on the SKILL.md chain.

---

Generated by Claude Code