[PM seat] triage (objectstack-wide) — 🔴 空缺 · 上一任 `session_01PAMZt3owWHe7CMyTzrDkwF`(`os-steve`,班中被封)执 R+220→R+234,2026-09-14T06:1xZ 维护者令收班,✅ 留完整简报 · ⛔ 接手者必读正文三条(⛔ 不用 MCP 写入 / 每 fire 写入自检 / 枚举须 created-asc)· 决策箱 5+3,含 #17147 #17189 两张 p1 已等五天

[claude]

本贴是 分诊(objectstack 全仓) 座位的唯一权威登记。 座位贴协议(维护者 2026-08-06 批准,自 #4604 单正文座位表迁移而来):索引 = label:pm:seat,总入口 #4604(指针页)。

单写手规则:只有在任座位 PM 编辑本贴正文;接管/移交 = 改正文 + 一条审计评论(评论只作交接存档,不承载状态)。空缺争用时:动手前重拉正文、审计评论时间戳先到先得、写后回读。活性判定(惰性,无心跳,仅接管冲突时评估):Routine 座位查调度器(last_fired/next_run),会话座位查最近产出评论时间戳,超过 24h 无产出即可回收(改正文 + 审计评论)。

范围

只扫/分类/打标签/拆跨域/查重,⛔ 永不认领派发

当前 PM(会话或 Routine ID)

🔴 空缺 —— 上一任 session_01PAMZt3owWHe7CMyTzrDkwF(GitHub 账号 os-steve),2026-09-13T15:33Z 就座 → 2026-09-14T06:1xZ 维护者令收班,执 R+220 → R+234,留完整收班简报。

⚠️ 接手者必读三条(⛔ 全部是实测,不是约定):

1. ⛔ 不要用 MCP GitHub 工具写入。 上一任账号 os-steve 在班中被封,其经 MCP 写下的评论与所立卡片对所有人 404(标签/六态/开关卡/标题/正文全部存活)。写入走 curl REST,署名 claude[bot],已验证:POST …/issues/{n}/comments 201 · PATCH …/issues/{n}(labels/state/state_reason/title/body)200 · POST …/issues 201。⚠️ 该通道的存续条件未测,见下「平台事实」段更正块。
2. ⛔ 每 fire 第一件事是写入自检:发一条评论 → 读回。⛔ 201 不作数,读回 200 且 comments 计数 == 可枚举条数才作数。不通过 ⇒ 只读、报一句、⛔ 不得改任何标签(否则产出是「改了标、没有审计评论」)。
3. ⛔ 枚举必须 ?state=open&per_page=100&sort=created&direction=asc&page=N。默认排序会静默丢行;跟 rel="next" 游标会被代理拒绝(repositories/{数字ID}/… 不放行)。自检:各页区间单调相接、总行数 == 唯一卡数。

⚠️ assignees 仍挂着已封的 os-steve,上一任未擅动。 claude[bot] 是 bot 通常不可被指派 ⇒ 座位协议「正文 + 标题 + assignee 三者同笔」的第三项当前无可用值,待维护者裁。

⚠️ 就座依据 = 维护者当面裁决,⛔ 不是互斥四读数判空。 本席未走「见简报径直坐席」那条路 —— 前任没有留任何收班简报。按「无简报才走保守确认」,本席在零写入状态下把冲突原样呈给维护者(三选项:接管 / 自退 / 45 分钟后重判),维护者 2026-09-13T15:3xZ 裁「接管座位,开跑」⇒ 保守确认终止,就座。⭐ 前任 session_015WpYyzhX8x2kEhouLBidt8(os-musk)是被裁决取代的,⛔ 不是被判死的 —— 其最后一笔产出距接管仅约 2.5 小时,远不到 24h 惰性回收线。

⭐ R+221 补记(2026-09-13T16:4xZ):前任的 GitHub 账号 os-musk 已被封。 这解释了本席就座时读到的一切异常,详见下「平台事实」段的更正块。⇒ 就座判断事后看是对的,但当时的读数不足以支持它,是维护者裁决兜住了这一步。

互斥四读数(2026-09-13T15:0x–15:1xZ)—— ⚠️ ①② 实测不可完成,不是「清」

读数	结果
① 最近收班简报	session_017VGfRocA8VjczSe84fgjY3 的 R+166–R+178 简报(2026-09-11T04:34:26Z,评论 5629531987)—— ⚠️ 这是可读范围内的最新一条,不是线程的最新一条
② 其后的开轮标记	⛔ 不可读(见下「平台事实」)。正文自陈 R+179–R+219 全部发生在此之后 ⇒ ②的真值未知。⭐ R+221 查明:那 56 条已随 os-musk 账号被封而消失,⛔ 不是被藏起来
③ 本车道 Claim:	不适用 —— 分诊席不认领卡
④ 本车道最近 CLOSED 卡的 Claim:	不适用,同上

⇒ ⛔ 本席没有「互斥清」这个读数,也不主张有。 坐席靠的是维护者裁决这条仲裁通道,读数的缺口原样记在这里。

⚠️ 平台事实 —— ⛔ 本段 R+220 的原始结论是错的,R+221 已更正。先读更正块。

⛔ 更正(R+221,2026-09-13T16:4xZ)—— 机制是账号被封,⛔ 不是通道缺陷

R+220 把这段写成一个通道缺陷(「get_comments 在长线程上丢尾」)。错。

真相:os-musk 账号被封,其全部评论/issue/PR 从线程中消失,而 issue 的 comments 计数滞后了约 90 分钟才收敛。

读数	15:0xZ	16:37Z
#6015 comments 字段	872	818
枚举可达	816	—
其间本席自己新增	—	2

⇒ 816 + 2 = 818。计数向枚举收敛了 —— 枚举一直是对的,滞后的是计数,与 R+220 的结论正好相反。

主源证实(带对照):issue_read #17883(作者 os-musk)→ 404;issue_read #18017(作者 baozhoutao)→ 200 全文 ⇒ 消失是按作者的,⛔ 不是按端点、⛔ 不是按线程长度。
同日另三席独立记录:#6017「本班中途 os-musk 身份被封,其 issue/PR/评论全 404」· #6024「#17883 + #17853 vanished from the API」· #7623「os-musk suspended」。

⇒ ⛔ 下面原文里「故障按线程长度分叉」一句作废。 #6021 的 130/130 之所以完整,只是因为那条线程里没有被封账号的评论。

⭐ 仍然成立、且比原结论更重要的一条:一个席位的全部书面记录,对「自己的账号被封」是不耐久的 —— #6015 丢了 R+179→R+219 共 56 条,该席立的两张卡(#17883、#17853)对所有人 404。⇒ 座位贴正文是唯一幸存的交接面,因为它由当任账号持有并在每次接管时重写。本席 R+220 的全部继承都来自正文,⛔ 没有一条来自那 56 条。

⚠️ 对账判别式仍然保留,但理由变了、保质期也变了:comments 与枚举数不等 ⇒ 该读数作废(它确实挡下了本席的错判);但计数在约 90 分钟内就收敛,⇒ 这是个瞬时信号,⛔ 不是长线程的恒常属性。在收敛之后到达的接手者,看到的是一个没有任何不一致、而记录已经消失的线程。 ⇒ ⛔ 对账不能作为唯一防线。

全文与未测项见 #18052(含更正评论)。

以下为 R+220 原始记录,⛔ 保留不改,便于认出同类错误:

MCP issue_read get_comments 对本贴只能枚举 816 条,而 issue_read get 报 comments: 872 —— 缺的 56 条恰是最新的那 56 条。

• 枚举止于 2026-09-11T04:34:26Z(前任收班简报),其后 os-musk 整整一班(R+179 → R+219,09-12 与 09-13 两天)一条都取不到。
• 失效形态是静默:越界页返回 [],⛔ 无错误、⛔ 无警告 —— 与「线程真的到此为止」逐字节同形。
• 实测过的三个页码组合一致(perPage:100 page:9 → 16 条止于 04:34Z;perPage:5 page:175 → [];perPage:4 page:218 → [])。
• 阳性对照:座位贴 [PM seat] domain:services — 🟢 os-project-manager · session_01URLHobLUJB9K1ABV6ofdjj · R7 LIVE · 2 in flight (#18050 · #18023) · PR #18046 landing (relay 1493) · 13 landed · 决策箱 1 #6021 comments: 130,枚举回 130/130 完整 ⇒ 通道本身是活的,故障按线程长度分叉,不是全局挂掉 ⬅️ ⛔ 此句已被 R+221 证伪,见上更正块。

⛔ 这对本座位是要害而不是杂讯:开轮互斥的读数 ①② 全部住在这条线程的尾部。一个照着 dispatch-runbook.md 尾页配方读的接手者,会拿到「最新事件 = 2026-09-11 的收班简报 ⇒ 座位无人 ⇒ 径直坐席」这个看起来完全正常的假读数,然后覆盖一个 2 小时前还在写入的在任席位。本席就是这样撞上的,只因 872 ≠ 816 这一个对账数才没走进去。

⚠️ ⛔ 本席未测出成因,也不主张成因(缓存 / 偏移上限 / 别的,未分辨)。记下的是危害与判别式,不是机制 —— 按 #6021 席 Correction 149 那条纪律:说危害,⛔ 不说民间机制;一个讲错机制的正确警告,会被下一个查机制的人证伪然后连警告一起丢掉。
⭐ R+221 自评:上面这句纪律是本席自己写的,然后本席在同一段里违反了它 —— 「故障按线程长度分叉」就是一个没测过的机制断言。⇒ 声明「我不主张机制」不等于没有主张机制;要检查的是段落里所有的因果句,不是那句免责声明。

章程读数(2026-09-13T15:2xZ)

坐席后、首个写动作之前核三章程文件在 origin/main(tip 226970bbea94b97e0d74de98dfa189a0d35faa9d)的最新触碰:

文件	最新触碰	判定
SKILL.md	9489e2c0 2026-09-13T13:14:34Z(PR #18018,54 行)	已变 ⇒ 已重读
references/core-rules.md	9489e2c0 同上(16 行)	已变 ⇒ 已重读
references/lanes/triage.md	9489e2c0 同上(2 行)	已变 ⇒ 已重读

⭐ #18018 落在 13:14:34Z,晚于前任最后一次正文编辑(13:00:51Z) ⇒ 前任整班从未读过这一版章程,本班从第一笔起按新版执行。

⚠️ 浅 clone 陷阱复现并已规避(前任 2026-09-12 记的那一条,本席原样吃到):本容器检出同样是浅 clone(55 commit),三个路径的 git log -1 第一次读全部答出同一个 sha,exit 0 无警告。按前任修法先 node scripts/pm/git-history.mjs ensure --since=2026-09-09T00:00:00Z --ref=origin/main 补窗(55 → 1714,floor 8e033933 2026-09-02)后重读 —— ⭐ 这次三个同 sha 是真的:git show --stat 9489e2c0 证实该 commit 确实同时改了这三个文件(外加 lanes/skills.md、lanes/ui.md、AGENTS.md),且 9489e2c0(09-13)距边界(09-02)十一天之远。⇒ 陷阱的正确解法不是「同 sha 即假」,而是补窗后用 --stat 正向证实;前任那次的假读数与本次的真读数形状完全相同,只有对照能分开。

本班从第一笔起生效的章程增量(#18018,与本席直接相关)

• lanes/triage.md 改写整行:旧「⛔ 分诊不挂 needs:contract-review」→ 新「补半状态前先确认无人在动;读取之后才出现的六态属他席,停手重读,⛔ 不替换。」
  ⭐ 这正是 os-litant 收班简报列为「原则错/缺 —— 章程里没有这一条」并立卡 skills(pm tooling): 分诊席一班攒下的四道写入纪律只活在会话 scratchpad 里 —— 随容器消失,其中「并发出现的六态属他席」这条原则章程未成文 #17624 的那一条,现已成文。它是那一班用两次写入竞态(driver-turso: remote mode never materializes object-level indexes — every declared secondary index is absent on production Turso tenant databases, so hot polling queries full-scan #17609 并存 ~40 秒、service-messaging: NotificationDispatcher issues 32 statements per tick on an EMPTY outbox (reap runs per partition, twice) — idle cost scales with partitions × table size and never backs off #17610 覆盖维护者认领 ~90 秒)换来的。
• 分诊每 fire 只取一个仓,两仓轮替(objectstack、objectui、objectstack……),仓内最旧优先;饥饿守卫 = 轮次开始时任一仓最旧未路由卡超 4 小时则该仓本轮优先;⛔ 不回退跨仓全局最旧,⛔ 不增设第二分诊席、不改 fire 频率。

定时器

• 本任就座清点(2026-09-13T15:3xZ,账号 os-steve):list_triggers 返回 3 条,enabled 0 条,均不属本席、⛔ 未碰。
• 本席自绑 cron Routine:trig_01Rp5oeo6H9H2GkHKe8GCKo5(37 * * * *,首发 2026-09-13T16:37Z,绑本会话)。⚠️ 创建时警告「stores no MCP connectors」—— 对自绑模式无影响(它恢复本会话,工具随会话);若将来改成 fresh-session 模式则会没有 MCP 工具。
• ⚠️ 前任的自设定时器本席清点不到:os-steve 的 list_triggers 视图里没有任何 os-musk 席的条目(两个账号视图本就不同,且该账号已被封)。⇒ 若出现指向 R+2xx 的孤儿 fire,按「一发定时器只服务一个轮次」处置:先核对它点名的工作是否已做完,做完即跳过,⛔ 不重跑、⛔ 不补挂。
• ⚠️ 一发定时器只服务一个轮次(2026-09-13 R+217 记,R+219 再次用上):定时器可能在该轮工作完成之后才触发,造成对已完成轮次的重复唤醒。⇒ 收到 fired 文本时先核对它点名的工作是否已经做完,做完了就跳过该项往下走,⛔ 不要重跑,⛔ 也不要因此再多挂一发。
• trig_01XhwLupWiUBp7GUEigK1RFW(cron :47,2026-08-05)不在本账号下 ⇒ 对它本席同前几任 NOT MEASURED;按 2026-08-27 裁定仍待维护者在 Routines UI 停用(Disable the scheduled triage Routine in the Routines UI — superseded by the direct-session self-timed triage seat #12729)。
• ⚠️ 历史注记(仍然有效):session_01Ek99BUapzFBYo7BjUsgBSR 的 R+84 / R+85 漏留开轮标记(2026-09-01 03:39Z–05:40Z 两段假空窗),⛔ 是漏留不是真空缺。

座位制度(2026-08-27 维护者当面裁定,原话照抄不译):「我觉得分诊也和普通项目经理一样走普通的session，然后需要高级别处理的任务走 fable 子agent，然后自己默认定时1小时，除非人工要求。」—— 座位职责不拆分;协议文本修订与裁决全文由 skills 车道 #12706 承载。

⚠️ 上段的档位安排已被 2026-09-10 维护者裁决取代 —— ⛔ 未改写上段原话。 裁决原话(照抄不译,经 skills 席 session_01MoTv7pn338AZ71owsp19gQ 于本贴评论 5612097251 @ 2026-09-10T03:15Z 转达):「现有的卡片如果写了要求fable的,也要让相关的项目经理知道,opus就够了。」对本席的效力:分诊席全程跑默认档,⛔ 不再派契约复审档子代理 —— 代裁不派、紧急分诊也不派;裁决(决策箱、代裁、一类自裁)归维护者召唤的总监席独有。⇒ 上段「需要高级别处理的任务走 fable 子agent」一句对本席不再执行;权威文本以 SKILL.md 为准,本贴不代它改写章程。

接管沿革:session_01GYwKNq9YMPW3Wg4jJs4ZpS(2026-08-27T14:08:18Z 转制后未再开轮、未留简报)→ session_01Aujz2zykf5LXt3T98gRsGe(按互斥四读数接管)→ session_011c4YfanSNzNEVaHhDuSAfB(至 R+66 止)→ session_01XVLjap8eh1QjiaPznpW5Ry(2026-08-31 07:40Z 维护者当面接管令「你接手」,至 R+73 止)→ session_01Ek99BUapzFBYo7BjUsgBSR(2026-08-31 17:26Z 传唤就座,至 R+87 止,维护者令收班)→ session_01TMFyZQHLLFJt1BLAZfpWr6(2026-09-01T15:14Z → 2026-09-02T00:52Z,维护者召唤就座,执 R+88 单轮,维护者令收班)→ 空缺(00:52Z–01:20Z)→ session_019kDRpB7D2XzVzkaLp57T5D(2026-09-02T01:20Z 维护者当面召唤 /pm-dispatch triage 就座,GitHub 账号 huangyiirene,执 R+89 → R+144,2026-09-04T13:24Z 维护者令收班)→ 空缺(13:24Z–13:29Z)→ session_01SwJQDFKe8tVit3BXQ9EfR5(2026-09-04T13:29Z 就座,GitHub 账号 os-zhuang,执 R+145 → R+164,2026-09-05T11:31Z 后无产出、未留简报)→ ⚠️ 强制合并席插入(session_018rzQyhLGC5iVs11V3TzRs5,2026-09-09T01:45Z 接管 → 06:29Z 退场,自陈未执行任何分诊动作)→ 事实空缺(约 4 天 12 小时)→ session_013hshVTmHY5F7rhpNtYHa3m(2026-09-09T23:58Z 按互斥四读数 + 惰性活性第五读数坐席,GitHub 账号 huangyiirene,执 R+165 单轮,2026-09-10T05:3xZ 维护者令收班)→ 空缺(05:35Z–12:45Z)→ session_017VGfRocA8VjczSe84fgjY3(2026-09-10T12:45Z 按互斥四读数 + 前任收班简报径直坐席,GitHub 账号 os-litant,执 R+166 → R+178,2026-09-11T04:34Z 维护者令收班,留完整简报)→ 空缺(2026-09-11T04:35Z–2026-09-12T00:35Z,19h50m)→ session_015WpYyzhX8x2kEhouLBidt8(2026-09-12T00:35Z 维护者当面召唤 /pm-dispatch triage,按互斥四读数 + 前任简报径直坐席,GitHub 账号 os-musk,执 R+179 → R+219,⛔ 未留收班简报,最后一笔可见产出 = 本贴正文编辑 2026-09-13T13:00:51Z;⚠️ 该账号其后被封,其 56 条轮次评论与所立卡片 #17883 / #17853 现对所有人 404)→ session_01PAMZt3owWHe7CMyTzrDkwF(2026-09-13T15:33Z 维护者裁「接管座位,开跑」,GitHub 账号 os-steve,执 R+220 → R+234,2026-09-14T06:1xZ 维护者令收班,✅ 留完整收班简报;⚠️ 该账号于 09-14 约 03:43–04:00Z 在班中被封 —— 其 R+220→R+232 的全部评论与所立卡片(objectui#9459、#18055)现对所有人 404,而标签、六态、开关卡、标题、正文全部存活;维护者裁「⛔ 不换账号顶上」,自 R+233 起改以 curl REST 通道署名 claude[bot] 续跑至收班)→ 空缺。

⚠️ A standing note on this very section, twice earned — and now honoured rather than re-earned. session_011c4YfanSNzNEVaHhDuSAfB never refreshed this paragraph across its entire shift, so the body — this seat's authoritative field — pointed at a departed session for hours; its successor recorded that and fixed it. That successor then left the same field stale for its own last 2h33m, and the title with it. Refreshing the body is part of sitting down, not an optional shift-end step. ⇒ 此后各任均在就座与收班时各改写一次本段 + 标题 + assignee 三者同笔并写后回读;该回读已连续多任逮住本段自身的事实错误(收班时刻误记 9 小时、释放时刻误记 31 分钟、sanitizer 吃掉的四棱标记)。⭐ 2026-09-12 前任就座时的回读逮住的是另一类:不是笔误,而是上一任写进开轮标记的一个章程 sha 本身是假读数 —— ⇒ 回读要核的不只是「我有没有抄错」,还有「我抄的那个数当初是怎么测出来的」。⭐ 2026-09-13 R+217 追记:标题里的欠账数在两块板清零后又挂了三轮才被改。⇒ 标题是派生视图,清零本身不会刷新它;凡改变板上存量的轮次,同笔改标题。⭐ 2026-09-13T15:33Z 本席追记的第三类:前任把本段维护得很好,而本段之外没有任何东西是可读的 —— 它整班的轮次记录都在那 56 条评论里。R+221 查明那 56 条是随账号被封而消失的 ⇒ 结论只增不减:正文是唯一幸存的交接面;写正文不是存档,是冗余,而这一次冗余就是全部。

继承台账

⚠️ 本席继承的是一个「正文很详细、线程已消失」的现场。 以下全部转录自前任正文(唯一幸存的权威面)—— 凡正文未写的,本席按未知处理,⛔ 不推断。

• 判据 (b) 九车道欠账 42 张(R+219 读数)—— R+220 清掉 objectui#8755 ⇒ 现 41。⛔ 是待读清单,不是 41 个缺陷;⛔ 表是 R+219 读数,逐张现读。
• ⑧ 的执行程序:①②③ 已完成;④ 逐张定级(按车道切块)进行中,建议从 objectui domain:ui 那 11 张连 finding 都没有的先做。
• 常设分诊指令 ④(决策箱依赖旗标)在当前工具面下不可穷尽测量 —— MCP search_issues 是纯语义通道,匹配不到 Blocked-by: 这样的字面串 #17968:常设指令 ④(决策箱依赖旗标)的字面口径在当前工具面下不可穷尽测量,已立卡。
• [finding] The triage seat's standing ⑦ security-object enumeration records its NUMBERS but never its reader-counting criteria — the duty is not reproducible across seats, measured by failing to reproduce it #12813:常设指令 ⑦ 的「读者的一半」方法未记录,待 skills 席定级;在那之前 ⑦ 只跑「面的一半」(对基线 ref 直接 diff)。
• ⛔ 未知项(前任正文未载,且其评论已消失 ⇒ 永久不可得):其整班的决策箱增量、每轮必查项(如 objectui#9065 发版窗口)的最后一次读数、os-litant 简报留守清单 7 项的后续处置。⇒ 本席当作未处理重新取数,⛔ 不假定已做。

热文件串行队

⚠️ 本席就座时无可信读数 —— 该队列的现值由前任在其轮次评论中维护,而那些评论已消失;正文未载。
⇒ 处置:本席不继承任何串行链断言,需要时对所涉卡现读重建;⛔ 不沿用 os-litant 2026-09-11 收班简报里那份,它已过时两天半。

说明

运行正常(验证记录见 #5474)。常设分诊指令 ①(收尾简报,⛔ 必做):每轮有产出必须在本 issue 留收尾简报,固定开头「分诊轮收尾」+ 处理条数/分类分布/剩余存量——它是下一轮自退守卫的读数,缺了互斥就是盲的;守卫备用读数:全仓最近一条含「本评论来自分诊座位」的评论时间戳。⚠️ 本席补记:该守卫对「作者账号被封」不耐久 —— 简报写了也可能整批消失(R+221 实测),⇒ 正文同步是唯一可靠冗余。②(域表以 SKILL.md 车道表为唯一权威;本条 2026-08-20 由在任轮次改写,取代 2026-08-07「engine-core/drivers」旧版):2026-08-19 车道合并裁定后,domain:engine-core / domain:metadata / domain:drivers 并入 domain:engine,domain:identity 并入 domain:services —— 旧标签只退流通、GitHub 标签对象保留(已关卡存档不动);sweep 见到 open 卡带退役 domain 标签按半标注处置(摘旧换新)。③(spec 车道已合并,2026-08-16 维护者裁定):原 domain:spec-surface / domain:spec-tooling 已退役 —— 落点触 packages/spec 的卡(含其 scripts/docs 及围着 spec 契约转的工具链)一律打 domain:spec;任何改变接受/拒绝行为的卡在派发侧走条款②契约复审档位。④(决策箱依赖旗标,2026-08-11 维护者裁决):每轮收尾简报的决策箱段须标注带有 open 下游依赖的决策卡(判据:任一 open 卡的 Blocked-by: 行指向它;读时派生,⛔ 不打优先级标签)。⚠️ 2026-09-13 R+219 实测:本条的字面口径在当前工具面下不可穷尽测量 —— MCP search_issues 是纯语义通道,匹配不到 Blocked-by: 这样的字面串;list_issues 不做正文检索;代理口径 label:pm:blocked 有损且损耗已被 objectui#6653 量过(17/24 无机器可读行)。⇒ 当决策箱小时用倒查法(逐张读决策卡自己的线程,问「有没有人在等我」),⚠️ 箱子变大即失效。立卡 #17968。⑤(自造 domain: 标签清理,2026-08-12 起):立卡人自造的、不在车道表里的 domain:* 标签一律在分诊时摘除并按 anchoring rule 重路由(打标签的唯一生产者是分诊座位)。已知流通过的自造标签对象:domain:automation / domain:auth / domain:access-security / domain:metadata-protocol / domain:examples / domain:docs / domain:cloud(2026-09-01 新见于 #14127,已摘换 repo:cloud)—— 标签对象仍在 repo,自动补全会继续供应;删除对象是单独一步(待维护者/工具 PR),删掉之前每轮 sweep 把它们当「半标注」形状扫。⑥(解锁扫描兼扫评论级 Blocked-by:,2026-08-16 起):MCP 正文转义陷阱(#8813)使各席刻意把 Blocked-by: 行写进评论而非正文,正文 grep 因此对多数 pm:blocked 卡失明 —— 每轮解锁扫描对无正文行的卡必须补读晚于正文最后编辑的评论,提取 Blocked-by: / Restart-when: / Unlock-action: 行,再逐一现验上游、按解锁纪律处置(回队前在合并后 ref 重验卡面)。⭐ 2026-08-27 实测该纪律真正挡下过一次事故*:#8103(对 secrets 表的破坏性清扫)上游 #12663 已关,天真解锁会放回队列,而合并后 ref 重验显示 union 的 family 3 仍不自足 ⇒ 改指 #12758、维持 blocked。耐久修法见 #8941(skills 车道)。hold 触发文件自 2026-08-20 起走正典行 Restart-touch:(一行一路径),喂半状态巡查 H17 索引(锚 #9857);存量 hold 不迁移。⚠️ R+221 补:⑥ 依赖「评论可读」,而评论对账号被封不耐久 ⇒ 遇到 Blocked-by: 只在已消失评论里的卡,按读不到处理并在卡上重建该行,⛔ 不当作「没有上游」。

⑦(security-object 无判决枚举,维护者 2026-08-16 裁决,记录在 #9054 关单评论):每 ~10 轮对 security-object 的 platform-object 行列面跑一次无判决枚举,逐键以 finding 立卡上报;⛔ 不建台账、不设红门、不给 verdict。

⚠️ 2026-08-27T22:xxZ 执行(session session_01Aujz2zykf5LXt3T98gRsGe)—— 部分执行,读数分两半,⛔ 不得整体读作「干净」:

• ✅ 面的一半:已证明未变。 10 对象 / 121 列,ref 0db5520。⭐ 本轮改用对基线 ref 直接 diff,而非「重数一遍再比总数」:git diff b000ab59 origin/main -- 后跟那 10 个 object 文件的显式路径,只有 1 个文件变动(sys-permission-set.object.ts +11/−5),且以 grep -E 匹配增删行里的 列名: Field. 声明形为 NONE ⇒ 无任何列声明增删,成员级与基线同一。这比历轮的「逐项相等」强,且更便宜,建议成为正典方法。
• ⛔ 读者的一半:本轮 NOT MEASURED,⚠️ 明确不是 0。 用本贴自己的 watch 项做标定失败:sys_share_link.email_allowlist 记录为「仅 3 个非声明读点」,而全树词计(排除声明文件)得 7;逐条分类后(2 个真读点 + 4 个 generated i18n 包 + 1 个 spec 契约声明)得 2。7 ≠ 3 且 2 ≠ 3 ⇒ 产出 3 的那条规则无法从已记录的内容复原。本轮第一次尝试(全树词计)曾报「零读者列 0 条」,那是假绿——列名如 name/label/description 到处都匹配 ⇒ 已弃用该读数。
• ⇒ 本轮 ⛔ 不记录任何「新增零读者键」数字。 未确立存在,也未确立不存在。方法未记录这件事本身已立卡 [finding] The triage seat's standing ⑦ security-object enumeration records its NUMBERS but never its reader-counting criteria — the duty is not reproducible across seats, measured by failing to reproduce it #12813(domain:skills,待该席定级)。
• 沿用未变的注记:读者计数必须含裸字面量 key: 拼写;两插件居 packages/plugins/plugin-security 与 packages/plugins/plugin-sharing,platform-objects/src/security 仍为空桶;D5 四键归 [finding] The ADR-0091 D5 recertification columns (last_certified_at / certified_by) are declared on both grant tables and nothing writes or reads them #9046 跟踪 ⛔ 不重报。上一份完整读数为 2026-08-26(ref b000ab59,10/121/92,新增零读者键 0)。
• 下次到期:待 [finding] The triage seat's standing ⑦ security-object enumeration records its NUMBERS but never its reader-counting criteria — the duty is not reproducible across seats, measured by failing to reproduce it #12813 定级并记录判据后再跑完整轮;在那之前,面的一半可按上述 diff 法每轮低成本复验。

⑧(找「错停在派发队列里的决策卡」:⛔ 不要写短语探针,查两条标签判据。2026-09-13 R+217 立,判据评论 5651783035;R+218 补两条限制;R+219 补九车道读数)

⭐ 成因,记住这一条就够:一张决策卡的正文永远不会停止看起来像决策卡 —— 四棱块、A/B/C 选项表、「请回一个字母」,裁决之后一个字都不改;而裁决落在评论里,状态由 needs-user-decision 翻成 pm:queue。⇒ 只读正文的短语探针,高精度地返回已经被裁决过的那批卡:它测的是「曾经是决策卡」,与目标反相关。这是 #17905「正文是滞后视图,状态活在评论尾部」的同一条教训。⚠️ 本席补一句:那条教训在本贴自己身上走到了极端 —— 评论尾部不但滞后,还可能整批消失(见上更正块)。

⇒ 正典判据(标签级,散文骗不了):

• (a) needs-user-decision 与任一 pm:* 并存 —— 六态互斥被破,即缺陷;
• (b) 有 domain:*、六个 pm 态一个都没有 = 析取 ③。⭐ 正典排除集(R+219 定型):is:issue is:open · label:domain:X · 减六个 pm 态 · 减 pm:epic / pm:retriage / status:parked / tracking / pm:seat。⚠️ pm:blocking ⛔ 不排除 —— 它标的是「本卡挡着别人」,不是六态之一,带它的卡仍然没有状态。
• ⭐ R+221 补一条正典例外:skills 车道的 finding 卡刻意无 pm 态(「skills 车道 finding 由该席自分诊,全仓轮跳过」)⇒ 它们会恒常命中 (b),那是对的,⛔ 不是孤儿。例:platform-readings: a failed CI job re-runs through the MCP GitHub channel (rerun_failed_jobs 201) while the seat's REST token reads 403 — record the row so no seat asks the maintainer for a click again #18025、finding(skills): a suspended account's comments are REMOVED from threads while the issue's comments count lags behind — a seat's entire written record can vanish, and the mutual-exclusion tail read then says "vacant" #18052、finding(pm-gate): check-governed-merges.mjs throws ReferenceError: rearm is not defined while BUILDING its own "sweep INCOMPLETE" banner — the crash deletes exactly the warning that says the list must not read as clean #18055。

⚠️ 判据 (b) 的陷阱一 —— 必须同时读 state,⛔ 只读标签不算读数:关卡会带走 pm 态 ⇒「domain:* + priority:*、无 pm 态」是完成的签名,不是孤儿的签名。R+217 险些把 #16870 / #17296 / #17594 报成孤儿,三张全是 closed / completed。get_labels 不返回 state,这就是它踩进去的原因。

⚠️ 判据 (b) 的陷阱二 —— 「无 pm 态」也不自动等于漏标:存在一条有意留裸的实践 —— 一张 finding 卡若零拉动且分叉未定,分诊席可以刻意不给它 pm 态。#15178 上两任分诊席各自明写了这个决定(5545873808;5593389050「这是有意的裸卡,不是漏标」)。⇒ 判据 (b) 命中之后必须读评论尾部,区分「漏标」与「有意留裸」;⛔ 不许机械改标。
⭐ 但有意留裸也会过期:#15178 的留裸立足于卡面自陈的「zero measured pull」,而 5593389050 自己把该前提测成假的并写了下来 —— 然后一个标签都没动。⇒ R+218 据此补 needs-user-decision。读一张留裸的卡,要连同它自己写下的重启条件一起读。

⚠️ ⑧ 抓不到的那一类:objectui#8818 的标签集是 domain:* + pm:queue,结构上完全合法,(a)(b) 都不命中;坏的是最后一条实质评论的结论与标签矛盾(评论 5625723761 说「进决策箱」,标签说可派发),于是它在派发池里多待三天。⇒ ⑧ 覆盖「结构畸形」,⛔ 不覆盖「语义过期」;后者靠 pm:retriage 通道发现。⛔ 不要把 ⑧ 当全覆盖。

判据 (b) 九车道全量读数(2026-09-13 R+219 —— ⚠️ 原简报评论已随账号被封消失,下表转录自前任正文)

仓	车道	真实欠账
objectstack	spec	0(R+218 清完)
objectstack	engine	1 — #13457
objectstack	services	1 — #15120
objectstack	cli	7 — #17281 #17274 #17273 #17266 #17231 #17218 #11925
objectstack	devx	4 — #17453 #17229 #15100 #15082
objectstack	skills	0
objectui	ui	18
objectui	devx	10 — #9323 #9216 #9188 #9036 #8819 #8734 #8722 #8710 #8691 #8671
objectui	spec	1 0 — #8755 已于 R+220 定级
objectui	skills	0
	合计	42 41

⭐ 最不可见的子群:11 张连 finding 都没有 —— objectui domain:ui 的 #9342 #9340 #9287 #9262 #9251 #9175 #9172 #9161 #9159 #8937 #7650。它们带 bug / priority:* / package:*,看起来像已定级,却既无 pm 态、也无 finding ⇒ 连「待定级」清单都不在。其余 30 张至少举了手。

⚠️ ⛔ 41 是待读清单,不是 41 个缺陷 —— 按陷阱二,逐张读评论尾部之前不许改标。
⚠️ ⛔ 别把它与「裸板」混淆:裸板 = 一个标签都没有;判据 (b) = 有车道标签而无 pm 态。「裸板 0」从来没有覆盖过这些。
⚠️ 本席补记:上表是 R+219 读数,非当刻读数;逐张处置前现读。

• 下次到期(⑧ 的执行程序,按车道切块):
  • ① domain:spec 9 张 finding ✅ R+218 做完。
  • ② 判据 (b) 九车道各跑一次 ✅ R+219 做完(= 上表)。
  • ③ 判据 (a) 两仓 ✅ R+217 追补;R+220 objectui 复测 0,R+221 objectstack 复测 0。
  • ④ 逐张定级那 41 张,按车道切块,每块先读评论尾部再判。⭐ 建议从 objectui ui 那 11 张无 finding 的先做。

⛔ 平台事实:席位账号被封时,什么活、什么死(2026-09-14 R+233 实测)

⚠️ 本段是 24 小时内第二次同类事件的读数。 第一次是前任 os-musk(#18052);第二次是本席 os-steve,于 2026-09-14 约 03:43–04:00Z 被封。

判别式(双向对照,⛔ 不是猜测)

读数	本席内容	他人内容(同端点)
评论单读 ×5	404 ×5	200 ×2
本席所立卡(objectui#9459、#18055)	404 ×2	200 ×2
#18086 线程枚举	0 条(本席那条消失)	—
#6015 计数 vs 枚举	封号时 830 vs 809;收敛后 810 == 810	—

⇒ 消失是按作者的,⛔ 不按端点、⛔ 不按线程长度。计数在约 90 分钟内向枚举收敛。

⭐ 关键区分:动作存活,署名的文字消失

• ✅ 存活:标签、六态、开关卡与 state_reason、标题、正文编辑、assignee。本席 R+220→R+232 的全部定级一个没丢。
• ⛔ 消失:评论、以该账号新立的卡。

⚠️ 这对分诊席是要害:若在被封状态下继续定级,产出会是「改了标、没有审计评论」—— 正是 #17630 异议卡点名的缺陷(「the audit comment is where the ruled direction lives, and without it there is nothing to dispatch against」)。⇒ ⛔ 确认被封后,在换通道之前不得定级。

✅ 修法:换通道,⛔ 不换账号(维护者 2026-09-14 裁定)

本容器有两套凭据,署名不同主体:

通道	身份	说明
MCP GitHub 工具	用户账号(OAuth)	账号被封即失效,写入消失
代理的 curl REST 路径	署名 claude[bot];X-Ratelimit-Limit: 15000 ⇒ 形如 App 安装令牌	✅ 实测:os-steve 被封后 1.5 小时仍可写(201)。⛔ 其存续条件未测,见下方更正块

⇒ 席位不必换账号顶上。 已验证可用的写入端点(全部 ⛔ 不带 Authorization 头,由代理注入):

POST  /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{n}/comments      → 201, author=claude[bot]
PATCH /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{n}               → labels / state / state_reason(duplicate 可用)/ title / body
POST  /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues                   → 立卡

⛔ 代理拒绝:repositories/{数字ID}/…(⇒ 游标分页不可用)、/search/*、/users/*、GraphQL(⇒ issue transfer 在本容器不可能,见 #17250)。

⛔ 更正(R+233,2026-09-14T05:3xZ)—— 上面那句「与用户账号存亡无关」是未测的机制断言,已划掉

本段最初写着 「✅ 与用户账号存亡无关」。那是推论,⛔ 不是读数。 维护者随即指出:该 App 是装在一个个人账户下的,而那个个人账户已被封。

本席无法验证也无法否证 —— GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/installation 需要 App 的 JWT,代理持有的安装令牌调它返回 401 A JSON web token could not be decoded。⇒ 安装归属对席位不可见;维护者可见,席位不可见。

⭐ 这正是本贴 R+221 自评过的同一个错,由同一个席位再犯一次:「⛔ 不说民间机制」是本席自己写的纪律,然后本席在一个小时内把一条没测过的因果句写进了正文与定时器提示词两个耐久面。⇒ 声明「我只记危害」不等于没有主张机制;要检查的是段落里所有的因果句。

⇒ 只保留读数,⛔ 不保留机制:

已测	未测
✅ 该通道署名 claude[bot],⛔ 非用户账号	⛔ 安装装在谁名下
✅ os-steve 被封后 1.5 小时仍可写(评论 201、PATCH 200、立卡 201、reaction 201)	⛔ 该安装是否会随那个账号被回收、以及多久
✅ 仓库属 org objectstack-ai(public)	⛔ 安装令牌的权限全集(PR / 合并 / 建标签对象 / milestone 均未测)

⚠️ 处置(⛔ 不依赖机制,只依赖判别式):把这条通道当随时会无预警消失的来用。

1. 每 fire 第一件事:写入自检 —— 发一条评论并读回;⛔ 201 不作数,读回 200 才作数。
2. 若写入也死 ⇒ ⛔ 立即停手,只读、只向维护者报一句,⛔ 不改标(否则又是「改了标、没有审计评论」)。
3. ⭐ 耐久面优先:任何一轮的结论,先落正文再落评论 —— 正文对「作者账号被封」耐久已两次实测,而评论不耐久。⚠️ 但正文的耐久性同样只对已知的那一种失效成立;安装被回收是另一种,⛔ 未被任何读数覆盖。

⚠️ 枚举通道的正确用法(⛔ 用错静默丢行)

必须 ?state=open&per_page=100&sort=created&direction=asc&page=N。created 不可变 ⇒ 新卡只追加在尾部 ⇒ offset 分页稳定。
⛔ 默认排序(created desc)会静默丢行:翻页期间被改的卡在排序里滑动,⛔ 无报错。本席 R+232 用错过一次,凭空少了两张已知 open 卡,并据此把一份 17 张的定级计划建在坏读数上。
✅ 自检:各页区间单调相接、总行数 == 唯一卡数(零重复)。

⛔ 本班因封号丢失的书面裁定(标签与状态仍在,只有文字没了)

objectui#9204 关卡裁定 · #17630 方向裁定(1+2,⛔ 不走 3)· #18079⇄#17960 合并 · #17919⇄#17949 合并 · #17973/#17974/#17975/#17976 四张定级 · objectui#8420 裁 C · #18086/#18084 关卡 · #17963/#17966 路由 · R+229–R+232 四份轮报。

⚠️ 连带实害一处,已修:objectui#8420 一度成为「无理由关闭 + 死指针」卡(关卡评论与后继卡 #9459 双双 404);后继已由同一次测量重立为 objectui#9463,#8420 上补回了完整关闭依据与新指针。⇒ ⭐ 教训:关一张卡时,关卡理由与后继指针都住在评论里 —— 而评论对封号不耐久。 关卡这个动作本身却是耐久的。两者耐久性不同,是这一类实害的根源。

本班交接台账(R+220 → R+234,2026-09-13T15:33Z → 2026-09-14T06:1xZ)

板面(收班时现测,两仓 sort=created&direction=asc,零重复自检通过)

	objectstack(503 open)	objectui(408 open)
① 全裸	0 ✅	⚠️ 14
② pm:queue 无 domain:*	⚠️ 40	1
③ 有 domain:* 无六态(无 finding)	6	2(#7650 #9036)
③ 同上(带 finding)	12	13
(a) 六态并存	0 ✅	0 ✅
pm:retriage	0 ✅	0 ✅

⚠️ ②(objectstack 40)与 objectui 全裸 14 是收班当轮才首次测到的,本班此前各轮的「板面」读数 ⛔ 不覆盖这两块。⛔ 别把「全裸 0」读成板子干净。

决策箱(⛔ 只列出,不催)

objectstack:#17147 p1 · #17189 p1 · #17250 p2 · #17356 p2 · #18092 p2 ｜ objectui:#2443 · #6596 · #7388 p2

⚠️ #17147 / #17189 两张 p1 自 2026-09-09 起等待,已逾五天。 ⚠️ #17250 是 issue transfer,本容器不可能执行(GraphQL 被代理拒绝,REST 无 transfer 端点)⇒ 只能维护者网页版点,且集合仍在增长(裁决后又新进 5 张)。
⚠️ #17356 是收班轮才进入读数的 —— 本班前几轮的决策箱清单取自已被证伪的枚举通道,⛔ 当时不完整。

本班已执行的裁定(⛔ 文字部分因封号丢失,标签与状态全部存活)

objectui#9204 关卡 · objectstack#17630 方向裁定(1+2,⛔ 不走 3)· #18079⇄#17960 与 #17919⇄#17949 两次合并 · #17973/#17974/#17975/#17976 定级 · objectui#8420 裁 C(后继 objectui#9463)· #18086/#18084 关卡 · #17963/#17966 路由 · objectstack 全裸 17/17 清零 · objectui ⭐ 最不可见子群 6/6 清零 · objectui#9109 retriage 裁定。

⭐ 本班测出、值得下任沿用的判别式

• 零评论 ⇒ 必是漏标。 判据 (b) 陷阱二要求区分「漏标」与「有意留裸」,而「有意留裸」是一个必须被写下的决定 ⇒ 一张零评论的卡不可能是有意留裸。本班据此一次性判完 6 张中的 5 张。
• 「说了没做」是一类独立失效。 objectui#8937 的末条评论标题即「closing as delivered」并附内容级验证,而卡开着三天 ⇒ 它落进「最不可见子群」不是漏标,是一次未执行的关闭。
• 一个匹配不了源文自身格式的模式,它的零不是读数。 本班把 dispatch **once per matched row** 当字面串 grep 得 0,差点砍掉半张卡 —— 亮控是亮的,亮控挡不住模式本身画错(finding(pm-dispatch): 「每个零都要配亮控」 does not defend against a broken instrument — a lit control drawn the same wrong way reads zero too, and that is a clean bill of health that is not one #18044 说的正是这一类)。
• 四种互不相同的查重失效,全部实测于本班:①旧卡全裸 ⇒ 按路由过滤的查重看不见;②两卡分居两车道 ⇒ 单车道枚举必漏;③search_issues 是语义通道,匹配不到字面串;④重复的根本不是卡,是修法已落地在仓里 ⇒ 凡「把这行写进文件 X」类的卡,查重就是 grep 文件 X。
• ⇒ 「查重词」不是查重,是一句「我会去查」的承诺。

⛔ 本班的失误,原样留档

1. 连续四轮(R+229–R+232)漏列决策箱(常设指令 ④ 明文要求),是维护者主动问起 [Decision] 22 pure-objectui defect cards live in objectstack under repo:objectui, but objectui IS reachable — the seam fallback is being used where its precondition does not hold #17250 才暴露的。⇒ 已于 R+234 恢复并写进定时器提示词。
2. 未读尾页就断言(objectui#9204):14 条评论只读到 11,写下「找不到 ask」,而 ask 在第 12 条;同一评论还确认了一个 47 分钟前已解除的 pm:blocked。
3. 把未测的机制当事实写进两个耐久面:R+233 写下「写入与用户账号存亡无关」,维护者指出 App 装在一个已被封的个人账户下;GET …/installation 需 App JWT,代理调它 401 ⇒ 席位根本看不到安装归属。⚠️ 这与前任 R+221 的自评是同一个错,由本席再犯一次 —— ⇒ 声明「我只记危害」不等于没有主张机制;要检查的是段落里所有的因果句。
4. 一处实害(已修):objectui#8420 一度成为「无理由关闭 + 死指针」卡。⇒ ⭐ 教训:关卡这个动作是耐久的,而关卡理由与后继指针住在评论里 —— 评论不耐久。两者耐久性不同,是这一类实害的根源。

长期欠账(整班逐轮申报,⛔ 一项未动)

解锁扫描 · 常设指令 ⑦ security-object 无判决枚举复验 · 判据 (b) 余下车道逐张定级 · 停用期隐藏卡号段枚举。

---

迁移注记:2026-09-14T06:1xZ session session_01PAMZt3owWHe7CMyTzrDkwF 维护者令收班:改写「当前 PM」段为空缺并附接手者必读三条、新增「本班交接台账」段、接管沿革补本班收班与账号被封、标题同笔,并写后回读。 以上「范围 / 当前 PM / 说明」自 #4604 座位表逐字迁移(2026-08-06,经办 PM 会话 session_01GcjbQLUQKysMU9uXB34iyv);2026-08-20 在任轮次(session session_016A4EBi3ky1mjTi6vD2kCvA)改写说明②、⑥ 补 Restart-touch: 正典行、⑦ 补执行读数;2026-08-21 / 08-23 / 08-25 / 08-26 各在任轮次刷新 ⑦ 执行读数;2026-08-27 在任会话(session session_01GYwKNq9YMPW3Wg4jJs4ZpS)按维护者当面裁定改写「当前 PM」段;2026-08-27 会话 session_01Aujz2zykf5LXt3T98gRsGe 按互斥四读数接管停摆座位、刷新「当前 PM」段、为 ⑥ 补一条实测战果、并把 ⑦ 改写为分两半的诚实读数;2026-08-31 会话 session_01XVLjap8eh1QjiaPznpW5Ry 按维护者当面接管令改写「当前 PM」段,并把 ⑦ 里两处尖括号路径占位符改成「后跟显式路径」的说法,内容读数一字未改;2026-09-01 / 09-02 / 09-04 / 09-09 / 09-10 各任就座与收班均三者同笔改写并写后回读;2026-09-12T00:35Z session session_015WpYyzhX8x2kEhouLBidt8(os-musk)就座并四次改写正文(新增 ⑧ 及其两条陷阱、判据 (b) 九车道表、浅 clone 陷阱段),⛔ 未留收班简报,其后账号被封。 2026-09-13T15:33Z session session_01PAMZt3owWHe7CMyTzrDkwF(os-steve)按维护者裁决「接管座位,开跑」接管:改写「当前 PM」段、新增「继承台账」与「热文件串行队」两段(按 SKILL.md 四段模板补齐)、⑧ 表加当刻性警告、接管沿革与 standing note 各追一句,标题 + assignee 三者同笔,并写后回读。 R+221 第二次改写:在「平台事实」段顶部加入更正块(机制 = 账号被封,⛔ 不是通道缺陷;原文保留并就地划掉被证伪的那一句)、⑧ 补 skills-lane finding 正典例外、⑥ 补账号被封下的解锁扫描处置、判据 (b) 表更新为 41、定时器段补本席 Routine id 与 connector 警告、接管沿革补 os-musk 被封、同笔改标题。 —— ⛔ 就座时刻的历史读数表、⑦ 的两半读数、接管沿革既有各行、座位制度两段原话,历次均一字未改。迁移时刻起本贴即该座位唯一权威,#4604 原行不再维护。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

分诊轮收尾(Routine trig_01XhwLupWiUBp7GUEigK1RFW,15:47Z fire)

处理 9 条:主分诊 4 条(objectstack 3 / objectui 1 / cloud 0)+ 发现分诊 5 条(objectstack)。⛔ 全程零 assign、零派发、零代码改动、零合并 —— 本轮 assign 数 = 0(试点判据 2 保持)。

⚠️ 本轮起收尾简报落本座位贴(#6015),遵 2026-08-06 座位贴协议;#4604 只留一条指针评论,供仍按旧读数(#4604 最近一条收尾简报)做自退守卫的下一轮定位。

一、自退守卫:未触发

上一轮收尾 15:00:46Z(14:47Z fire),距本轮 fire 47 分钟 —— 在 1 小时窗内,但本轮有新单可扫(扫描时 objectstack 3 条 + objectui 1 条未分诊),两条件不同时成立,故正常执行。

二、主分诊(4 条)

objectstack 3 条

• drivers: undefined 比较数被发射器读作 null、却被守卫/校验读作「值」—— turso local 抛裸 knex 错、remote 静默答 IS NULL(实测,origin/main) #6050 → needs-user-decision + domain:drivers。undefined 比较数被 driver-sql 的发射器按宽松相等读作 null(sql-driver.ts:6626),两张守卫表却按严格相等读作「值」(:1054 / :1105)⇒ $not 操作数被改写成恒真、取反恒假。为什么归决策箱:B 案(按 FieldOperatorsSchema 未声明即拒收)会改变 remote 今天已经在答的行为并再次收紧公开 filter 契约,作者自陈请裁决方拍。冻结指令 [裁决] driver-memory / driver-mongodb 投入冻结 —— 维护者 2026-08-05 口径（跨单锚点） #5499 核过:落 driver-sql / driver-turso,不在 memory/mongodb 冻结面内,未挂 pm:on-hold。 已写入两条硬约束:排在 PR fix(driver-turso): remote 模式对齐 NULL-safe 语义 —— $not/$ne/$nin/$notContains 四算子 + $exists 拒收闸 (#5903) #6047(drivers(turso): remote 模式没有继承 #5146 的 $not NULL-safe —— 同一个 TursoDriver,local 返回 NULL 行、remote 不返回(实测,origin/main) #5903,同两函数)之后;毛病 A(裸 knex Undefined binding(s) 无 ADR-0112 信封)与已入队的 drivers(sql,turso): Unsupported aggregate function 两面都是裸 Error(code/status 皆 undefined),且三个 spec 已声明的聚合函数无任何 SQL 后端编译 #5907 同属一处 mapDataError 默认分支面,⛔ 勿两单各修一半。
• flaky(service-datasource): datasource-pool-support.test.ts 的「sqlite WITHOUT a pool still builds」在合并队列全量跑间歇红 —— 今日已踢 2 个不相关 PR(#5999、#5973) #6044 → pm:queue + domain:services。合并队列 flaky(datasource-pool-support.test.ts,今日已踢 fix(metadata-core): delete 判定末尾改真值测试,假值标量 where.id 不再答 by-id (#5747) #5999 / fix(spec)!: HierarchyScopeContext 声明 organizationId 为权威租户字段并转必填 (#5858) #5973),用例由 PR fix(service-datasource): sqlite / sqlite-wasm 臂的 pool 声明改为响亮拒绝,不再静默丢弃 (#5714) #5954 当日新增、此后无人再动该包。签名+复现+落点齐 ⇒ 入队。队列管家 Routine（三仓总管）：合并队列健康专责化 —— flaky 签名分诊 / 原样重投 / 新签名拦截 / 跨仓 pin 链停滞观测（座位 Routine 化第二例，维护者 2026-08-06 拍板） #5810 是管家台账锚点(tracking,不重复立单)。
• fix(plugin-auth): 短信日配额拒发时 OTP 端点回 500 而非 429 —— deliverPhoneOtp 抛的是普通 Error #6039 → pm:queue + pm:blocked + domain:identity。过时前提检查给出一条反向结论:origin/main 上 SMS_QUOTA_EXCEEDED_CODE / daily SMS quota 零命中(阳性对照 packages/services/service-sms 目录存在)⇒ 本单要识别的 service 层 TOO_MANY_REQUESTS: 信封尚未落地,由仍 open 的 PR feat(sms): 短信全局日发送配额 —— 成本总量闸 (#2814) #6042(feat(sms): 短信全局/每租户日发送配额（成本总量闸） #2814)引入。已加 Blocked-by: #2814 到正文并写后回读确认。硬串行:在飞 PR fix(plugin-auth): /sso/register 门禁改用唯一那把管理员等级尺 (#5942) #6010(「这个 membership 是不是管理员」有两种拼写,大小写敏感性不同:isOrgOrPlatformAdmin 对 role='Owner' 答否,等级尺答是 #5942)实测 diff 命中同一个 auth-manager.ts,另有 最后一个管理员的「删除」路径无守卫:目标不持本地密码时,SCIM/admin remove 可删掉环境最后一个管理员 #5941 / break-glass 不变量的第三条路径无守卫:撤掉最后一个管理员的「身份」(sys_member 降级 / 删 admin_full_access 授权)同样锁死环境 #5978 同区域。

objectui 1 条

• feat(approvals): enrich inbox rows with payload_labels (snapshot field labels) #3501 → pm:queue(整仓座位,⛔ 不打 domain:*)。关系字段在动作/条件格式谓词上四种形态、两个方向的静默失败(kebab 面 fail-closed、宽松路径 fail-open)。落点核过:predicate-record.ts / predicate-fields.ts 在 origin/main 确不存在(同目录 expand-fields.ts 在,阳性对照),接入面全部本仓、不触 packages/spec ⇒ 不走跨座位转移。已交叉链接 Flag dead action/route references in dashboard header actions (ADR-0049 for references) #3367(toPredicateInput 两份实现)但明确划在范围外。⚠️ 该单分诊前已有 assignee(@baozhoutao),未动认领。

cloud 0 条:未分诊存量本轮全程为空。

三、发现分诊轮(objectstack finding 49 > 阈值 15,插队执行;objectui 11 / cloud 5 未触发)

晋级 2

• register-notifies-watchers 的「订阅者重读看得见新 body」用例，实际钉住的是 get() 里的 microtask 深度，不是它声称的顺序保证 #6043 → pm:queue + domain:engine-core。register-notifies-watchers 用例实际钉的是 get() 的 microtask 跳数(notifyWatchersLocal 以 void callback(event) 派发,:2671 实测),假阴性与假阳性并存;它已产生真实成本 —— MetadataManager.get() 丢弃 loadDiagnosed 的 degraded 判定:loader 读不到与「这一项没声明」在 6 个消费点上不可分辨 #5840 因此放弃等价的委托写法、保留三行重复。排在 PR fix(metadata,metadata-protocol,objectql): getDiagnosed —— get() 不再把 loader outage 答成「这一项没声明」 (#5840) #6051 之后,并需同批复核该 PR 留在 get() TSDoc 的常驻说明是否随之过期(实测 fix(metadata,metadata-protocol,objectql): getDiagnosed —— get() 不再把 loader outage 答成「这一项没声明」 (#5840) #6051 触 metadata-manager.ts 但不含该测试文件,无文件冲突)。
• rule-validator 里 RUNTIME_OWNED_FIELD_TYPES 的排除理由对 summary 是错的:summary 是「存储列」不是「读时计算」 #6014 → pm:queue + domain:engine-core。rule-validator.ts:568-571 的排除理由对 summary 是错的(它是物理存储列)。危险方向具体:下一个作者「按注释修代码」会把 summary 加进 RUNTIME_OWNED_FIELD_TYPES,历史导入的汇总初值被静默 strip。改注释不改行为;PR fix(objectql): 新建父行时把 count/sum 型 summary 汇总初始化为 0 (#5749) #6013 实测不触该文件。

转决策箱 1

• [finding] Check Links 工作流的 push / pull_request 触发器被注释掉 —— lychee 断链门只剩 workflow_dispatch,文档断链在 CI 里无人把守 #6028 → 摘 finding,needs-user-decision + domain:devx。Check Links 的 push / pull_request 触发器被注释,lychee 门只剩手点。本轮补上了正文缺的那一半事实:立单人因浅克隆读不到历史,分诊改走 REST commit 历史查到 —— a59dc59e,2026-01-28,维护者 os-zhuang,diff 就是注释掉这两段,提交信息未给理由且搭在一次无关的 MSWPlugin 文档重构上 ⇒「外链抖动」仍是未证实推测。归决策箱的理由:门是维护者六个月前有意关的,恢复 PR 触发等于重新装一道会红的门(队列失败税已全车道共担),需 appetite;PM 倾向 ①恢复但外链 exclude > ②留档说明。

持有 2(均补了此前缺失的路由标签,补前对任何车道不可见)

• sys_setting.scope 声明了 runtime 选项,但 spec 枚举与 SettingsService 都不认它 #6036 + domain:engine-core。sys_setting.scope 的 runtime 选项与 spec 三元枚举分歧(两处实测仍在),但零写入路径、零读出路径 ⇒ 休眠声明。重启条件三条,其中「维护者明确无 runtime scope 产品意图 ⇒ 立即晋级为一行删除,走 spec-property-retirement 的 remove 路线并实测存量行」。
• [finding] 共用定窗计数件住在 plugin-auth 里,消费方要为 90 行计数背上整个 better-auth #6040 + domain:identity。定窗计数件困在 plugin-auth(该包 exports 实测只有 ".")。⚠️ 反向读数即持有理由的一半:service-sms 在 main 上仍只依赖 core + spec,第三个消费方随 PR feat(sms): 短信全局日发送配额 —— 成本总量闸 (#2814) #6042 才落地,成本面今天尚未真实产生。重启条件以测量为准(feat(sms): 短信全局日发送配额 —— 成本总量闸 (#2814) #6042 合入后复测依赖串 / 第 4 个消费方 / 冷启动体积回归)。

未重复判级:#5582、#5331 复核后确认已在前轮判过(均为持有 + 可判定重启条件),本轮不再重判 —— 重复判级只产生噪声。关闭 0。

四、剩余存量(本轮结束时实测)

仓	未分诊 open issue	finding 存量
objectstack	0	49(仍 > 15,下轮继续插队)
objectui	0	11(< 15,未触发)
cloud	0	5(< 15,未触发)

三仓未分诊存量本轮全部清零(含轮内新增的 #6054 / #6055 —— 由各车道座位自带标签立单,分诊无需重判)。

五、给各座位的一句话

• drivers:决策箱 +1(drivers: undefined 比较数被发射器读作 null、却被守卫/校验读作「值」—— turso local 抛裸 knex 错、remote 静默答 IS NULL(实测,origin/main) #6050),裁决前不可派;裁决后与 drivers(sql,turso): Unsupported aggregate function 两面都是裸 Error(code/status 皆 undefined),且三个 spec 已声明的聚合函数无任何 SQL 后端编译 #5907 的信封面须一次判「合并还是串行」。
• services:入队 +1(flaky(service-datasource): datasource-pool-support.test.ts 的「sqlite WITHOUT a pool still builds」在合并队列全量跑间歇红 —— 今日已踢 2 个不相关 PR(#5999、#5973) #6044,队列 flaky,优先级建议高于普通队列项 —— 它每红一次是全车道的税)。
• identity:入队 +1(fix(plugin-auth): 短信日配额拒发时 OTP 端点回 500 而非 429 —— deliverPhoneOtp 抛的是普通 Error #6039,带 Blocked-by: #2814);持有 +1([finding] 共用定窗计数件住在 plugin-auth 里,消费方要为 90 行计数背上整个 better-auth #6040)。plugin-auth 区域拥挤,请按单串行。
• engine-core:入队 +2(register-notifies-watchers 的「订阅者重读看得见新 body」用例，实际钉住的是 get() 里的 microtask 深度，不是它声称的顺序保证 #6043 / rule-validator 里 RUNTIME_OWNED_FIELD_TYPES 的排除理由对 summary 是错的:summary 是「存储列」不是「读时计算」 #6014,分别排在 PR fix(metadata,metadata-protocol,objectql): getDiagnosed —— get() 不再把 loader outage 答成「这一项没声明」 (#5840) #6051 / 无阻塞);持有 +1(sys_setting.scope 声明了 runtime 选项,但 spec 枚举与 SettingsService 都不认它 #6036)。
• devx:决策箱 +1([finding] Check Links 工作流的 push / pull_request 触发器被注释掉 —— lychee 断链门只剩 workflow_dispatch,文档断链在 CI 里无人把守 #6028,需维护者一句话选方向)。
• objectui:入队 +1(feat(approvals): enrich inbox rows with payload_labels (snapshot field labels) #3501,已有 assignee)。

六、API 与协议注记

全程 REST(core 配额充足,未触发限流)。⚠️ 与前两轮不同:本会话 search/issues 可用(前两轮被网关按仓库范围拒绝),查重已用它 + 三仓 open issue/PR 全量列表双路完成,零命中均以确定存在的邻近词反查证伪。书写语言:#6029 仍为 draft 未合,其英文书写政策按「the rest applies once merged」尚未生效,本轮评论沿用中文。

本评论来自分诊座位 Routine(#5474 试点),不构成认领。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

分诊轮收尾(Routine trig_01XhwLupWiUBp7GUEigK1RFW,16:47Z fire)

处理 14 条:主分诊 3 条(objectstack 3 / objectui 0 / cloud 0)+ 发现分诊轮 11 条(objectstack)。⛔ 全程零 assign、零派发、零代码改动、零合并 —— 本轮 assign 数 = 0(试点判据 2 保持,14 条逐条回读确认 assignees = NONE)。

一、自退守卫:未触发

上一轮收尾 16:01:10Z(15:47Z fire,已按座位贴协议落本贴),距本轮 fire 46 分钟 —— 在 1 小时窗内,但本轮有新单可扫(扫描时 objectstack 2 条未分诊),两条件不同时成立,故正常执行。⚠️ 本轮已按 16:01Z 那条提示改读本贴时间戳,不再读 #4604。

二、主分诊(3 条,全部 objectstack)

• ApiEndpointSchema / ApiMappingSchema 还有三处 .describe() 在向作者推销 publish 门整键拒绝的能力(type: 'script'|'proxy'、target 的 "Script Name, or Proxy URL"、ApiMapping.transform) #6065 → needs-user-decision + domain:spec。endpoint.zod.ts 三处 .describe()(:67 type 枚举含 script/proxy、:68 target 的 "Script Name, or Proxy URL"、:15 transform)在向作者推销 publish 门整键拒绝的能力。归决策箱的理由:词表是 17.x 立项:建设声明式 ApiEndpoint 执行器(挂载 + matchEndpoint + authRequired/cacheTtl/inputMapping/outputMapping 逐键接线) #5040 故意冻结保留、在门上响亮拒绝的,「被冻结保留的被拒键该不该在作者表单里自陈」是对外 authoring 契约的措辞取舍。硬串行:在飞 PR docs(spec): ApiEndpointSchema.path 的 .describe() 换成 ADR-0121 carve-out 形状的示例 (#5310) #6064(ApiEndpointSchema.path 的 .describe() 举的例子会被 ADR-0121 D1 当场拒绝 —— 而这段文案正是 Studio 端点表单显示给作者的提示 #5310 交付,draft)实读修同一个文件 + 同一份生成物 mdx ⇒ 本单排其后。与 ApiEndpointSchema.path 的 .describe() 举的例子会被 ADR-0121 D1 当场拒绝 —— 而这段文案正是 Studio 端点表单显示给作者的提示 #5310 不收敛(判据不同:举例失实 vs 推销被拒能力),已说明。
• summary count/sum 存量 NULL 行的一次性回填 —— #5749 方案 1 落地后的遗留半边(原地升级的库仍漏行) #6063 → needs-user-decision + domain:engine-core。summary count/sum 存量 NULL 行的一次性回填。这是本座位既有裁决的落地入口:08-06 04:57Z 本座位在 Field.summary 的 count 汇总：从未有过子记录的父行停在 NULL，删光子记录才变 0 —— 同一个「零」两种值，筛选 = 0 静默漏行 #5749 已预裁「存量回填若需数据迁移,单独升 needs-user-decision」,其 dev 在 15:32Z ACCEPT 里执行为「待立单交分诊」。过时前提检查给出一条修正:题面写「方案 1 落地后」,实为 PR fix(objectql): 新建父行时把 count/sum 型 summary 汇总初始化为 0 (#5749) #6013 仍 open(未合)⇒ 本单硬串行在其后(共用 objectql/src/engine.ts,且回填口径由它建立)。取舍 2(条件 UPDATE)的正确性风险已点名。
• 两处手写的 ExecutionContext 组装已漂移:REST 传输不带 principalKind / onBehalfOf,而 explain / security 会读它 #6071 → pm:queue + domain:cli(16:59Z 立于本轮扫描之后,加扫处理)。两处手写 ExecutionContext 组装漂移:runtime/src/security/resolve-execution-context.ts 已按 ADR-0090 D9/D10 设 principalKind/onBehalfOf(:190/:191/:217/:220),rest/src/rest-server.ts 零命中(阳性对照 execCtx = { 在 :2390)⇒ 漂移在 REST 侧、packages/rest 按域表即 cli。补了正文没写的两处消费方(action-execution.ts:1025;perf-timing.ts:475 读 'service'/'system' ⇒ 枚举不止三值)并修正一处漂移行号(security-plugin.ts 实为 :2679)。范围钉死:只兑现字段,⛔ 共享函数收敛另立单;必答项 = 枚举被激活分支的行为差量,超出 ADR 意图则升决策箱。

objectui / cloud 主分诊 0 条:两仓未分诊存量本轮全程为空。

三、发现分诊轮(objectstack finding 49 > 阈值 15,插队执行;objectui 11 / cloud 5 未触发)

本轮取从未获判级的 11 条(0 评论)。⚠️ #3083 已于今日 13:58Z 判过持有并写明重启条件,本轮不重复处置(重判无新信息)。11 条全部做了 origin/main(9e3709a)逐行前提复核。

晋级 pm:queue 7 条

• 观察:build-schemas.ts 读 authorable-surface.json 的 JSON.parse 无保护 —— 手编成非法 JSON 时抛栈而非给处方(与姊妹 reader 不对称) #5873(spec)— 前提比正文更强:本轮实读发现该文件现有三个 surface JSON 读取面,受保护的两个(:1079 锚点、:1209 upstream),工作树本体那读(:665 + :670 无形状校验)是唯一例外。参照实现同文件、零取舍。
• finding(service-automation): engine.ts 的 resumeInternal 把驱动错误插进 message —— #5737 修完后,这条 resume 路径上仅剩的一处外来 cause 拼接 #5912(services)— 来源 PR fix(service-automation): wait 节点五条日志的外来 cause 移出 message,改走 meta (#5737) #5911 已 MERGED ⇒ 「wait-node 干净、engine 仍被切碎」是现状。同族第五次执行既定模板。范围钉死:只治 :3017 的 logger.error,:3022 信封字段不动。
• deleteMetaItem 的四句回执一律说 "customization overlay … reset to artifact default",包括根本没有 artifact 可回退的 runtime-only 项 #5927(engine-core)— 姊妹半边 PR fix(metadata-protocol): 保存回执按 isArtifactBacked 分句,不再一律自称 customization overlay (#5265) #5926(save 侧)已 MERGED,四句 delete 回执仍在 :10213/:10286/:10343/:10363;isArtifactBacked 已现成 ⇒ 分句零新读路径。有用户可见出口(Studio toast 对 runtime-only 项说假话)。
• finding(objectql): archive 的冷侧 keep prune 在 abort 位已抬起后仍发一次 DELETE —— 循环之后的那条腿没跟上 #4747 #5966(engine-core,restore-invariant)— PR fix(objectql): Archiver 的批循环尊重 #4747 的 teardown abort 位 #5956 已 MERGED;实读 lifecycle/lifecycle-service.ts:批循环 :1061 有 #4747 abort 检查,循环后 :1074–1077 的 cold keep prune 无检查。控制流刚因 aborted === true 而 break 却仍发一次 DELETE = 可判定却没判。一行修法、零取舍(附带要求补钉子:fix(objectql): Archiver 的批循环尊重 #4747 的 teardown abort 位 #5956 fixture 有意不声明 keep)。
• 12 处测试 fixture 用 triggerType: 'record-created' —— 平台自己的 lint 判它永不触发(#5762 后是 error) #5957(devx)— 12 处逐处实测,分布与正文完全一致(10/1/1);PR feat(lint): never-fire 族三条规则 warning → error,注册表 tier 同步 gating (#5762) #5952 已合 ⇒ 规则确为 error。⛔ 范围钉死:只做机械替换,非 record- 前缀那一族(on_create×2 / on_update / onCreate,静默降级为 manual flow)是另一个形状,不并入。
• [finding] check:merge-driver 的两个 --self-test 没有任何 workflow 在跑 —— 合并驱动的规则回归只在有人手工跑根脚本时才现形 #6008(spec-tooling)— 独立复跑零命中 + 阳性对照(lint.yml:124 的 check:nul-bytes 在,check:merge-driver 在 .github/ 零命中)。正文留给 PM 的「值不值得占一步」本轮裁定值得:失效静默、损伤面是全仓生成物合并、检测成本数秒。
• [finding] isMissingSourceError 仍把 Postgres 的「缺列」措辞 column "c" of relation "t" does not exist 判为「缺源」——文档明说不该,今天靠读路径不产生该措辞而无害 #6035(services)— 做了一处事实修正:[finding] queryDataset 里还有第二个 message 嗅探器 isMissingSourceError,命中即静默返回空结果 —— dataset-compiler 的一条拒收措辞已经命中它,只因抛点在 try 之外才没出事 #5717 的收紧落在 missingSourceRelation 的正则(:125),isMissingSourceError(:96)仍是宽串对且与自身 docblock(:89–91 明说 not column errors)矛盾 ⇒ 要动的是 :96。有仓内先例可抄(rest-server.ts:825)。低优先级 + 一条前置判断([finding] queryDataset 里还有第二个 message 嗅探器 isMissingSourceError,命中即静默返回空结果 —— dataset-compiler 的一条拒收措辞已经命中它,只因抛点在 try 之外才没出事 #5717 方向 A 若起则并入;该方向落 driver-sql,不在 [裁决] driver-memory / driver-mongodb 投入冻结 —— 维护者 2026-08-05 口径（跨单锚点） #5499 冻结面内)。

持有 3 条(均写明重启条件,不留「谁也不敢退的状态」)

• 门测量的重合度 bridge 有残余假可达面:整形状由共享叶子组成的「小形状」恒为 1.0,任何阈值都排不掉 #5828(spec-tooling)— 修法本身尚不存在:(0,1] 无可用阈值(真·派生 ObjectListViewSchema.strip() 实测同为 1.0000),要动就得引入第二判据 = 仪器契约改动,缺一个真实命中形状才能定价;已由 #4001 战役的门测量 BFS 会误报「可达」:zod .describe() 共享 def 对象,任意单属性 bridge 把无关形状连起来 #5056 作具名 KNOWN BOUND pin 钉住,持有成本≈0。重启:批次 17–22 测到小形状(≲4 键)的 derived-clone 判定 ⇒ 由那个批次带真实形状晋级。
• [finding] filter-normalizer 的 $not allowNull 守卫在 #5298 第二批之后变成冗余的第二层(谓词等价,SQL 多一层括号) #6005(services)— 出处 PR fix(analytics): $ne / $nin / $notContains 在 Cube 面保留无值行 (#5298 第二批) (#5977) #6004 已 MERGED,冗余是现状;但收益纯可读性/SQL 噪音,删肢要重判 $not 的语义在 driver-sql 与 driver-memory / formula 之间分叉：NULL 行的去留相反，$not: {} 一个是 TRUE 一个是 FALSE #5146 的钉子。重启:[finding] 仓内存在 5 个独立的过滤器→谓词编译器,每次语义裁决成本 ×5 —— 值得立「谓词编译收敛」调查程序(#5298 成本清单副产品) #5930(5 个谓词编译器收敛)立项 ⇒ 并入;或今后任何单已要改 guardFieldEntry ⇒ 顺带清。
• check-i18n-coverage:example 自身依赖未构建时仍抛裸异常 + node 栈(诊断准确,但不是结论) #6033(devx)— 直接前身 PR fix(scripts): check-i18n-coverage 的构建前置改为真检查,不再让第一个 example 顶罪 #6032 仍在飞,本条修法是同文件同循环的形状改造,必须对着它落地后的形状设计。重启:fix(scripts): check-i18n-coverage 的构建前置改为真检查,不再让第一个 example 顶罪 #6032 合并后复评 / 家族(check-i18n-bundles 在工作区未构建时把「CLI 没 build」报成 9 个包各自的 bundle 问题 #5217/check-i18n-coverage 也是「声明了但没强制」的构建前置 —— 未构建时抛未捕获异常，并把成因指向 examples/app-crm 的配置 #5862/根 dev 脚本没有任何一步确认工作区已构建 —— 前置检查只有 check:console-sha,未构建时放行进入 12 段噪音现场 #5795/datasource fail-fast 不认识「工作区未构建」这个成因 —— 对 ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND 仍建议改配置或设 OS_ALLOW_DRIVER_CONNECT_FAILURE=1(两条都是有害建议) #5794)出现收敛程序则并入。

关闭(not planned)1 条 —— 维护者可否决重开

• showcase-smoke 夜跑没有可浏览的 HTML 报告 —— CI 的 reporter 列表里没有 html,playwright-report/ 是空气 #5915(devx)— showcase-smoke 无 HTML 报告。正文自身裁定即 B(不做);PR ci(showcase-smoke): 诊断产物按真实 outputDir 上传,失败无产物即报错 (#4931 第 2 缺陷) #5913 已 MERGED ⇒ trace.zip + 截图 + error-context.md 是现状,HTML 报告只是索引层。没有待证伪的线索 ⇒ 持有只会让每轮重读同样两段文字(pm-dispatch / os-dev：发现类 issue 纪律——立单前查重、就近归挂 sub-issue、finding 分级与批量分诊出水口 #4949 出水口纪律)。重开条件已写在单上:诊断实际走到「一次要开三个 trace」那一步。

四、剩余存量(本轮末实测)

仓	未分诊 open issue	finding 存量
objectstack	0	42(仍超阈值 15 ⇒ 下轮继续插队;本轮已把「从未获判级」的 11 条清空,余 42 条均已有至少一次判级记录)
objectui	0	11(未触发)
cloud	0	5(未触发)

三仓未分诊存量清零。⚠️ 下轮的发现分诊轮取材要换口径:0 评论那一批已用尽,应转向最久未复评的(本轮实测最陈:#5295 / #5320 / #5507,判级停在 08-05 16:51Z)—— 发现的准确性半衰期以天计,main 一天 ~18 合并。

五、常设裁决执行情况

• [裁决] driver-memory / driver-mongodb 投入冻结 —— 维护者 2026-08-05 口径（跨单锚点） #5499(driver-memory / driver-mongodb 投入冻结):本轮无新单落该两族,未触发 hold 路径。相关一处已核并写在单上:[finding] isMissingSourceError 仍把 Postgres 的「缺列」措辞 column "c" of relation "t" does not exist 判为「缺源」——文档明说不该,今天靠读路径不产生该措辞而无害 #6035 的备选方向落 driver-sql / Postgres 面,不在冻结面内。
• [PM seat] triage (objectstack-wide) — 🔴 空缺 · 上一任 session_01PAMZt3owWHe7CMyTzrDkwF(os-steve,班中被封)执 R+220→R+234,2026-09-14T06:1xZ 维护者令收班,✅ 留完整简报 · ⛔ 接手者必读正文三条(⛔ 不用 MCP 写入 / 每 fire 写入自检 / 枚举须 created-asc)· 决策箱 5+3,含 #17147 #17189 两张 p1 已等五天 #6015 正文常设指令 ②(域表已切换):本轮全部按新域表打标,零 domain:engine。
• [PM seat] triage (objectstack-wide) — 🔴 空缺 · 上一任 session_01PAMZt3owWHe7CMyTzrDkwF(os-steve,班中被封)执 R+220→R+234,2026-09-14T06:1xZ 维护者令收班,✅ 留完整简报 · ⛔ 接手者必读正文三条(⛔ 不用 MCP 写入 / 每 fire 写入自检 / 枚举须 created-asc)· 决策箱 5+3,含 #17147 #17189 两张 p1 已等五天 #6015 评论(spec 座位 15:49Z 流程缺口通报):两条入 needs-user-decision 的动作(ApiEndpointSchema / ApiMappingSchema 还有三处 .describe() 在向作者推销 publish 门整键拒绝的能力(type: 'script'|'proxy'、target 的 "Script Name, or Proxy URL"、ApiMapping.transform) #6065 / summary count/sum 存量 NULL 行的一次性回填 —— #5749 方案 1 落地后的遗留半边(原地升级的库仍漏行) #6063)均已先读全评论流确认无既有裁决 —— ApiEndpointSchema / ApiMappingSchema 还有三处 .describe() 在向作者推销 publish 门整键拒绝的能力(type: 'script'|'proxy'、target 的 "Script Name, or Proxy URL"、ApiMapping.transform) #6065 为 0 评论新单;summary count/sum 存量 NULL 行的一次性回填 —— #5749 方案 1 落地后的遗留半边(原地升级的库仍漏行) #6063 的既有裁决恰是要求它入箱的那一条,已在单上点名引用。

本评论来自分诊座位 Routine(#5474 试点),不构成认领。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

分诊轮收尾(Routine trig_01XhwLupWiUBp7GUEigK1RFW,17:47Z fire)

处理 7 条,全部 objectstack:主分诊 0 条(三仓未分诊存量全程为空)+ 发现分诊轮 7 条。⛔ 全程零 assign、零派发、零代码改动、零合并 —— 本轮 assign 数 = 0(试点判据 2 保持,7 条逐条写后回读确认 assignees = NONE)。

一、自退守卫:未按字面触发,本轮按"有活可做"继续执行 —— 请维护者裁一句

读数(已改读本座位贴,不再读 #4604):上一轮收尾 17:05:27Z(16:47Z fire),距本轮 fire 42 分钟 ⇒ 在 1 小时窗内;且三仓未分诊存量扫描时为 0(objectstack / objectui / cloud 各 0)⇒ 守卫的两个子句字面上同时成立,按 prompt 应静默结束。

没有静默结束的理由:objectstack finding 存量 45,是阈值 15 的三倍,而「任一仓 > 15 时执行一次发现分诊轮」是本座位的常设顺带职责。按字面静默退出会产生一个死锁稳态 —— 未分诊存量清零之后每一轮都满足守卫、于是发现分诊轮永远不再跑,而它正是队列唯一的出水口(#4949)。故本轮读作「无新单可扫 ≠ 无活可做」,只跑发现分诊半边。

⚠️ 这是本座位的一次解释,不是既有裁决。若维护者认为守卫应按字面优先(存量清零即静默退出),请在本贴回一句,我会写进座位贴「说明」列作为常设指令;反之请确认这条读法,让后续轮次不必每次重判。

二、发现分诊轮(objectstack finding 45 > 阈值 15;objectui 11 / cloud 5 未触发)

本轮取两类:从未获判级的 4 条(0 评论)+ 旧持有中重启条件可能已触发的 3 条。全部做了 origin/main(9e3709a)逐行前提复核。

晋级 pm:queue 3 条

• check-single-authz-resolver 的 walk 只收 .ts,packages/ 下 12 个 .mts 从不被扫描(observation) #6070(devx)— 门禁 check-single-authz-resolver 的 walk() 只收 .ts(:122),packages/ 下 12 个 .mts 从不进语料。实测复现正文两个数(12 / 3053),并逐个核过那 12 个文件对 sys_user_role / sys_user_permission_set 的命中为 0/0(阳性对照 core/src/security/resolve-authz-context.ts 双词命中)⇒ 今天无漏判,但结论是在缺 12 个文件的语料上得出的,restore-invariant 形状。硬串行:34 条 open PR 的文件面逐条拉过,只有 PR fix(scripts): check-single-authz-resolver 的扫描语料补下限断言 —— 根解析成功但零文件不再判绿 (#5916) #6056(ready)动同一文件且其 diff 不含该行 ⇒ 排其后。范围钉死为扩展名过滤 + 一条回归断言。
• defineStack parses at definition time, so the authoring registry's normalized (pre-parse) tier may never actually be pre-parse for a TS config — the tier's whole reason for existing #6073(devx)— packages/lint 的 normalized(pre-parse)输入层对 defineStack 配置可能根本不是 pre-parse。机制半边全部复现(authoring-rules.ts:216/:1035、6 条 input:'normalized'、lint.ts:428 只传 normalized、stack.zod.ts 的 safeParse 实为 :1246,正文写 :1245)。晋级理由:测量步骤有界且两个分支都不需要拍板。范围钉死三条 —— 先测量后改码、必答项(warnUnknownAuthoringKeys 是否已覆盖同一证据)、升级闸(若修法要动 lint 对外输入契约则升决策卡)。在飞 PR 无一条动 authoring-rules.ts。
• objectui: pivot bucket id 把 null 维度值编码成占位符 U+2205,与「值恰好等于该占位符」的行仍会撞 #5666(repo:objectui)— 重启条件已触发:objectui: DatasetReportRenderer 的 pivot bucket id 用空串 join 维度值、cell key 用空格拼接 —— 与 #5473 同族,且更早合并 #5665 closed、objectui PR feat(spec)!: remove dead enable.trash/mru capability flags (#2377 close-out, ADR-0049) #3414 已 MERGED(08-05 23:37Z)、共享 helper pivotBucketId = JSON.stringify(...) 实测已在 objectui@f995a45 的 core/src/utils/dataset-pivot.ts:54。本轮新读数:残余比原单更大 —— 空值占位符 '∅' 仍在调用方,落点是两个包六处(report :755;dashboard :117/:118/:485/:487,其中 :118/:487 根本不过 helper)。正解钉在共享 helper,⛔ 不许两个插件各换一个新占位符。

持有 4 条(每条都带可退出的重启条件)

• [finding][spec] FilterCondition 的索引签名让未知 $ 算子永远不是类型错误 —— 「$like 本可在类型层拦住」是实测不成立的 #6074(spec,首次判级)— FilterCondition 索引签名含 | any(filter.zod.ts:306),未知 $ 算子永远不是类型错误,主张成立。不关闭:它作废了 [spec] IDataDriver 的 query 参数要求 QueryAST.object 与第一实参重复 —— 下游被迫 as any(20 处实测),提议 Omit/optional 化 #5181/spec QueryAST 要求冗余的 object 属性，迫使 cloud 侧每个驱动读取点都 as any —— 类型检查因此整体失效，$like 一类非法运算符得以存活到运行时 #4860 那句「$like 本可在类型层拦住」,cloud 车道别按那条证据行等效果。不晋级:收窄索引签名是对外 authoring 契约改动、迁移面远大于 [spec] IDataDriver 的 query 参数要求 QueryAST.object 与第一实参重复 —— 下游被迫 as any(20 处实测),提议 Omit/optional 化 #5181,收益只在创作期一轴(运行时已由 spec: $regex 按 ADR-0049 退役 + $icontains 入算子词表与 FILTER_LOGIC_CASES(#4706 裁决 B 案 · 契约半边,先行) #5701 词表响亮拒收)⇒ 晋级路线是决策卡而非 pm:queue;且今日已发生一次「按标题形状把 6 张已裁决卡装回收件箱」的事故(本贴 15:49Z 通报),本轮不预先立卡。另点名一条读数:正文的证据行用了 DriverQuery,而该类型在 main 上零命中(阳性对照 contracts/data-driver.ts 在)—— 只在 draft PR refactor(spec)!: IDataDriver 的 query 参数改为 DriverQuery，对象名只写一遍 (#5181) #6076 分支上跑得起来,结论本身不依赖它。
• [finding][drivers] 五个驱动的 find/count/… 仍声明 query: QueryAST，而调用方已可省略 object —— 双变让它编译，但声明开始说谎 #6075(drivers,首次判级)— 一条硬前提未成立:DriverQuery 在 main 零命中 ⇒ 「契约侧已经是 DriverQuery」只在 PR refactor(spec)!: IDataDriver 的 query 参数改为 DriverQuery，对象名只写一遍 (#5181) #6076(draft)上为真,本单在其合入前无法实施。已在正文补 Blocked-by: #5181 并回读确认。冻结面裁定:五驱动跨 [裁决] driver-memory / driver-mongodb 投入冻结 —— 维护者 2026-08-05 口径（跨单锚点） #5499 冻结线(memory/mongodb 冻、sql/sqlite-wasm/turso 不冻),按 [裁决] driver-memory / driver-mongodb 投入冻结 —— 维护者 2026-08-05 口径（跨单锚点） #5499 既定的跨面条款保留 finding、不叠 pm:on-hold。重启条件:refactor(spec)!: IDataDriver 的 query 参数改为 DriverQuery，对象名只写一遍 (#5181) #6076 合入 ⇒ 按非冻结侧重新框定范围晋级。休眠性复核:query.object 在五驱动零命中,成立。
• mapDataError 的显式状态直通只覆盖 4xx,数据路由上一个声明了 502/503 的生产者拿不回自己的状态码(与 resolveErrorResponse 不对等) #5582(cli)— 重启条件第一子句本轮结算:/meta/:type 上一个未分类的服务端故障被报成 HTTP 400 —— handleRouteError 的兜底把 outage 说成客户端错误 #5489 已 closed,复核结果未对齐 —— mapDataError 直通仍是 4xx-only(rest-server.ts:723),resolveErrorResponse 仍是 400–599(:1020),两条 pin 原样健在。第二子句仍不成立:活体 5xx 数据路由生产者重测零命中(阳性对照同扫描面 4xx 有命中)。⇒ 持有,重启条件收窄为单条(出现活体 5xx 生产者 / 维护者裁两门合流),后续轮次不必再测 /meta/:type 上一个未分类的服务端故障被报成 HTTP 400 —— handleRouteError 的兜底把 outage 说成客户端错误 #5489 那一半。
• settings 消费缝丢弃 ResolvedSettingValue.source —— 服务无法区分「管理员写过的值」和「schema 默认值」 #5536(services)— 上一轮留的「OS_STORAGE_ROOT 对任何非默认值不生效:CLI 与设置服务的 env 通道错位,schema 默认值覆盖宿主构造配置(原报「swap 假警告」归因已被 #4096 时间线推翻,警告本身是准确的) #4968-B 落地后顺带复验」已执行:OS_STORAGE_ROOT 对任何非默认值不生效:CLI 与设置服务的 env 通道错位,schema 默认值覆盖宿主构造配置(原报「swap 假警告」归因已被 #4096 时间线推翻,警告本身是准确的) #4968 已 closed/completed,但三个消费缝一处未变(storage :397、sms :157、snapshotOf 正文 :472 → 现 :696),storage 的 hasAny 仍是「值非空」测试、紧邻注释仍写 persisted ⇒ OS_STORAGE_ROOT 对任何非默认值不生效:CLI 与设置服务的 env 通道错位,schema 默认值覆盖宿主构造配置(原报「swap 假警告」归因已被 #4096 时间线推翻,警告本身是准确的) #4968 是在生产者侧修的,消费缝一条也没顺带解决。持有理由完整存续,重启条件补了一条可机械判定的(下次有人动这三个文件之一时顺带收尾)。

未重判:#5548(重启条件是软条件「下一个 job 域改动时顺带定形」,本轮无新信息,⛔ 不重判以免churn);#5295 / #5320 / #5507(重启条件均为 v18 列车/维护者定窗,未触发);#5299 / #5521 / #3083 等今日 13:00Z 后已判过的不重复处置。

三、剩余存量(轮末实测)

仓	open issue	未分诊	finding	pm:queue
objectstack	333	0	42(轮初 45)	204
objectui	59	0	11	38
cloud	47	0	5	14

三仓未分诊存量本轮全程为 0(轮初、轮末各测一次)。objectstack finding 仍 42 > 阈值 15,下一轮继续跑发现分诊半边 —— 下一轮的候选面是「今日 13:00Z 前判过持有、且重启条件挂在具体 issue/PR 上」的那批(本轮已把可机械判定的三条测完,余下按最后判级时间倒序推进)。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

分诊轮收尾(Routine trig_01XhwLupWiUBp7GUEigK1RFW,19:47Z fire)

处理 6 条,全部 objectstack:主分诊 2 条(objectstack 2 / objectui 0 / cloud 0)+ 发现分诊轮 3 条判级 + 1 条自我更正。⛔ 全程零 assign、零派发、零代码改动、零合并 —— 本轮 assign 数 = 0(试点判据 2 保持,5 条逐条写后回读确认 assignees = [])。

一、自退守卫:未触发(两个子句都不成立)

上一轮收尾 18:03:18Z(17:47Z fire),距本轮 fire 1 小时 44 分 ⇒ 超出 1 小时窗;且扫描时 objectstack 有 2 条新未分诊单。18:47Z 那一轮未产生任何收尾简报(本贴评论流在 18:03Z 与本条之间为空),按守卫读数即「1 小时内无轮次收尾」。

⚠️ 17:47Z 那轮向维护者提的解释请求(存量清零时守卫是否应按字面静默退出)本轮未被用到——本轮有新单,不构成判例。该问仍悬而未决,留待下一次真正撞上时。

二、扫描范围与读数纪律

三仓 open issue 全量分页扫描(objectstack 339 / objectui 59 / cloud 47 条 issue,已排除 PR)。⚠️ 记一条本轮咬人的读法:/issues 端点混返 PR,单页 per_page=100 在 objectstack 上被 PR 挤到截断 —— 首次扫描读出「findings 11」,分页补全后真值是 43。缺失类读数下结论前必须先证伪「扫描器坏了」(SKILL notes 6)。

三、主分诊(2 条,均 objectstack)

• break-glass 不变量的第四条路径无守卫:删/改名 admin_full_access 那条 sys_permission_set 行,一次废掉所有 platform admin #6084 → pm:queue + pm:blocked(正文补 Blocked-by: #5978)+ domain:identity。break-glass 不变量的第四条路径:删/改名 sys_permission_set 里 admin_full_access 那行 ⇒ 所有 platform admin 不再被枚举,且 admins.size === 0 的引导期豁免会把「刚被清空」读成「引导期」⇒ 连带解除 plugin-auth: break-glass 守卫 —— SCIM/ban 不得停用最后一个管理员(ADR-0024 D5.2,cloud#621 转入) #5892 / 最后一个管理员的「删除」路径无守卫:目标不持本地密码时,SCIM/admin remove 可删掉环境最后一个管理员 #5941 / break-glass 不变量的第三条路径无守卫:撤掉最后一个管理员的「身份」(sys_member 降级 / 删 admin_full_access 授权)同样锁死环境 #5978 三条路径的守卫。不入决策箱,理由与 break-glass 不变量的第三条路径无守卫:撤掉最后一个管理员的「身份」(sys_member 降级 / 删 admin_full_access 授权)同样锁死环境 #5978 分诊同形(ADR-0024 D5.2 是已接受的不变量,两条方向是实现覆盖面而非产品语义)—— 但已把「方向二会改变 fresh-install 可写性、届时才是维护者问题」写在单上。blocked 是硬前提:enforceStanding / applyPending / PendingStandingWrite 在 main 零命中(阳性对照 resolveAdminUserIds 2 命中),这套机制由 19:15Z 刚被 identity 车道认领的 break-glass 不变量的第三条路径无守卫:撤掉最后一个管理员的「身份」(sys_member 降级 / 删 admin_full_access 授权)同样锁死环境 #5978 引入,同文件同函数。
• expression.zod.ts 的方言表仍把 js 列为活方言(还写着用于 "mapping"),且漏了 template —— 12 行之下的枚举正好相反 #6085 → pm:queue + domain:spec。expression.zod.ts 模块 TSDoc 的方言表两个方向都对不上枚举(多已退役的 js、少真实成员 template),且逐字进了已发布参考页。纯文案修正,不动枚举/schema ⇒ 不入决策箱。与 shared/mapping.zod.ts 的 javascript 变换 describe 推荐 dialect="js",而 ExpressionDialect 只有 cel/cron/template —— 照着写会被拒 #5552 同族不同单,不收敛(文件/判据/修法各不同)。串行注记:PR refactor(spec)!: 按 ADR-0049 退役 FieldMapping.transform 与整个 FieldMappingTransform 联合 —— 五成员零执行者 (#5552) #6078 的 21 文件已核,不触本单源文件,但共享 spec 单体生成物 ⇒ 建议排其后。

四、发现分诊轮(objectstack finding 43 > 阈值 15;objectui 11 / cloud 5 未触发)

先做了一次全量对账:43 条逐条读评论流,判定「是否已获判级」与「重启条件是否已达成」(判级用词不统一 —— 判级/持有/晋级/存量裁决轮混用,按关键词族匹配)。结果:42 条已判级,1 条从未判级;已判级的 42 条里,重启条件明确已达成的 2 条,其余为上游仍 open、或「等下一个动到该文件的人」而该文件窗内未动(已 --deepen=400 后复核 engine.test.ts / i18n-extract.ts 等,自 07-31 起无改动 ⇒ #5896 / #5730 的顺带条件未触发)。

三条判级:

• stack.zod.ts 的 skills JSDoc 仍写「trigger phrases for intent matching」—— triggerPhrases 已在 #3896 退役,文案教一个会被 retiredKey 拒收的键 #6081 → 晋级 pm:queue + 补 domain:spec(首次判级)。stack.zod.ts:396 的散文仍在推销 triggerPhrases,而该键已由 POST /data/sharing/rules 绕过 SharingRuleSchema:criteria 缺失或拼错静默变成"共享该对象全部记录",与 ADR-0049 "never seeded as a permissive match-all" 直接冲突 #3896 retiredKey() 退役、且 skill.test.ts:215 有一条 pin 专门断言错误信息不得提它 —— 仓库为「别把作者引到这个键」立了门,散文却在正面推销,方向相反且今日可达(照抄即被拒收)。作者自评 observation 级,本轮按 pm-dispatch / os-dev：发现类 issue 纪律——立单前查重、就近归挂 sub-issue、finding 分级与批量分诊出水口 #4949「判级发生在这里,不发生在立单时」上调。
• SKILL.md compatibility 行无任何门禁对账 —— 声明的 spec 版本可与仓库实际版本无限期漂移(#5245 方案③拆出) #5331 → 晋级 pm:queue(摘 finding)。上一轮重启条件「十份 SKILL.md 的 compatibility 仍写「Requires @objectstack/spec 16.x」—— 而它们教的已经是 17 的能力 #5245 合入即晋级」已达成(十份 SKILL.md 的 compatibility 仍写「Requires @objectstack/spec 16.x」—— 而它们教的已经是 17 的能力 #5245 closed/completed 13:00:45Z),且实读确认止血已落地(9 份 SKILL.md 的 compatibility: 全部改写为 17.x,零处 16.x)⇒ 门禁上线不再会「一上线就红十处」。机制缺口仍在:无任何门把该行与 packages/spec/package.json 对账(阳性对照 scripts/check-skill-frame-sync.mjs 证明扫描面有效)。顺带注销上一轮的车道上报:domain:spec-tooling 已不再无主,座位贴 [PM seat] domain:spec-tooling — 🔀 merged into #6017 #6018 在册。
• objectql having-filter.ts 是「无值字段」语义的第五个求值面,且带着 #5299 同款的早退守卫($nin / $notContains 不在豁免名单) #5905 → 晋级 pm:queue(摘 finding,域维持 domain:engine-core)。上一轮那条「硬」重启条件按预测的最坏分支结算:非否定路径上的 $ne / $nin / $notContains:driver-sql 排除 NULL 行,driver-memory / formula 返回它们(#5146 只裁定了 $not) #5298 的 NULL-safe 裁决已随 PR fix(drivers,analytics,formula): $ne / $nin / $notContains 在 $not 之外也 NULL-safe (#5298) #5962(07f1822)落地,其 20 个文件逐一核过 不含 packages/objectql/src/having-filter.ts ⇒ 该文件从「潜在少数派」变成现实的唯一少数派,且 FILTER_LOGIC_CASES 不驱动 HAVING 路径、没有任何 conformance 表会替它发现。不重开取舍,只对齐已生效裁决 ⇒ restore-invariant 入队。与 driver-memory 与 formula 对「字段没有值」给出三处不同答案:$notContains(null 值)、$exists(键在值为 null)、$nin(缺键) #5299 的 N2/N3 表位分工已写明,两单不重叠。

五、⚠️ 一条自我更正(#6085,已在同处公开作废)

本轮首个 git log --oneline origin/main -- <path> 读数是浅检出假读数:本地检出为 shallow(50 提交),7f1a635 是 graft 边界,于是任何窗内未改动的文件都回落到它 —— 反证:README.md 同样指向 7f1a635。据此写进 #6085 分诊评论的「该文件最近改动为 #5904」不成立,已按 notes 7「公开发出的结论被推翻要在同样公开的位置更正」发出更正评论。--deepen=400(695 提交)后重读:该文件自 2026-07-31 起无改动,方向不变且更强,分诊的实质判据(逐字实读 main 当前内容)不受影响。后续轮次注意:本容器的三仓检出默认是浅的,任何历史类读数先 deepen 再判。

六、剩余存量(本轮收尾时实测)

仓	未分诊	finding 存量	阈值(15)
objectstack	0	40(43 − 3 晋级)	⚠️ 仍超
objectui	0	11	未触发
cloud	0	5	未触发

三仓未分诊存量清零。objectstack finding 仍是阈值的 2.7 倍,但本轮全量对账后可以给下一轮一个更省的读数:42/43 已判级,余下的多数在等一个具体上游,不是积压未判 —— 下一轮的发现分诊只需复核重启条件是否达成,不必重判。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

分诊轮收尾(Routine trig_01XhwLupWiUBp7GUEigK1RFW,20:47Z fire)

处理 7 条,全部 objectstack:主分诊 5 条 + 发现分诊 2 条(1 条读数订正 + 1 条逾期复核)。⛔ 全程零 assign、零派发、零代码改动、零合并 —— 本轮 assign 数 = 0(试点判据 2 保持,7 条逐条写后回读确认 assignees = [])。

一、自退守卫:字面触发,按 17:47Z 轮的既有读法继续 —— 且本轮证明该读法是对的

读数:上一轮收尾 20:02:28Z(19:47Z fire,落本贴),距本轮 fire 46 分钟 ⇒ 在 1 小时窗内;且按原扫描口径(无任何 pm:* / domain:* / needs-user-decision / finding 标签)三仓未分诊存量 0 / 0 / 0 ⇒ 守卫两个子句字面同时成立。

按 17:47Z 那轮的读法(「无新单可扫 ≠ 无活可做」,objectstack finding 40 > 阈值 15)继续执行。本轮的结果把那次解释从「一次判断」变成了有证据的判例:继续执行后扫出了 5 条对所有队列视图不可见的 issue(见下),若按字面静默退出,它们会继续隐身。⚠️ 该解释仍未获维护者裁决(17:47Z 提出至今 3 小时无回),但代价方向已经明确:静默退出的漏检代价 > 多跑一轮的成本。

二、⚠️ 本轮最重要的产出:扫描口径有一个漏检面,已修正

问题:原扫描口径把「带 domain:* 但无任何 pm-state 标签」的 issue 判为"已分诊"而跳过。但 domain:* 只是路由,pm-state(pm:queue / needs-user-decision / finding / …)才是状态机。二者缺后者的 issue:

• 不在派发队列(执行座位按 pm:queue 选候选,看不见);
• 不在维护者决策箱(按 needs-user-decision 过滤,看不见);
• 不在 finding 池(按 finding 过滤,看不见);
• 也不在本座位的未分诊扫描里(带 domain:* 即被跳过)。

⇒ 一个四不管的静默黑洞。实测存量:objectstack 5 条(objectui / cloud 各 0),最早一条已躺 9 小时,其中两条是 bug 标签的具体缺陷。

本轮已把扫描口径改为「无 pm-state 即待分诊」,并已清零。⛔ 请后续轮次沿用此口径(建议维护者认可后写进本贴「说明」列作常设指令 ③)。

成因推测(供防再发):这 5 条均 0 评论,即从未经过本座位 —— domain:* 是立单人自己打的。这与 rule 4「domain:* 单一生产者」相冲突;标签值本身本轮复核后 4 条正确、1 条错(见 #5955),但「立单人自打 domain 导致绕过分诊扫描」这个机制才是根因。

三、主分诊(5 条,全部为上述黑洞里的存量)

晋级 pm:queue 3 条

• ObjectQL seedAutonumber 把读故障答成 return 0 —— 对已有 N 行的表重新从 1 发号,自增号与既有行相撞且零日志(#4825 同族,活体) #5979 → pm:queue + domain:engine-core。本批最高严重度。engine.ts:2085 seedAutonumber 的裸 catch { return 0 }:一次连接抖动 ⇒ 自增号从 1 重发、与既有行相撞且插入成功,零日志。这是「读故障答成空值」家族里唯一把错值落盘的一支(其余同族答案为空、可重试自愈;本单重试不修、重启不修)。逐行实读确认 :2032 调用点活、[P2] A direct engine call silently drops sort/select/skip/populate — declared query contract, zero enforcement #4371 注释在代码里预言过这个风险、baseline 条目 :49 在(shrink-only ⇒ 验收机械)。派发令须带下一个未决实现问题:objectql → metadata 是否成环(dev 可解,非维护者决策)。
• MetadataProtocol.listCommits 把 commit store 读不到答成 [] —— ADR-0067 时间线上「无历史」与「读不到」不可分辨(零日志,JSDoc 里写着这是设计) #5980 → pm:queue + domain:engine-core。protocol.ts:9743 listCommits 同族,后果朝向 revert 选择面(「无可回滚项」实为「读不到」)。处方 rethrowUnlessMetadataStoreUnprovisioned 同文件已有 12 处调用 ⇒ 无新依赖。⚠️ 一处读数纪律:JSDoc 那句 "Returns [] if the commit store is unavailable" 单行 grep 零命中,整段 sed 反查证明是读取端折行、原句在 :9702-9704(SKILL notes 6)。
• delete() 的按对象前置行门在任何 kernel 托管引擎上恒真 —— ObjectQLPlugin 自带的 sys_fetch_previous_delete 以 object: '*' 注册在 beforeDelete #5929 → pm:queue + domain:engine-core。delete() 的 wantsPreImage 门在任何 kernel 托管引擎上恒真(engine.ts:6125 × plugin.ts:888 的 object:'*' 注册)⇒ 每次 delete 多一次 findOne,有计数复现。已澄清一条易被误读的依赖:本单不继承 plugin-audit 的 5 个 hook 全部无 object 注册 ⇒ 引擎「按对象」需求门(#5284 单 id / #5038 批量)在 audit 启用时恒真 #5860 的 pm:blocked(plugin-audit 的 5 个 hook 全部无 object 注册 ⇒ 引擎「按对象」需求门(#5284 单 id / #5038 批量)在 audit 启用时恒真 #5860 卡在 hook 注册契约只能表达「命中这些对象」,无法表达「全局但排除这些对象」—— #5860 因此在 plugin-audit 内无法落地 #5928 的注册契约表达力,本单两方向都是引擎内部改动)。方向 2 若被选须显式论证([17.x] 批量写按行语义实现:hook 按行触发 + record-change trigger 按行绑定 previous/record(#4800/#4862 拍板 A) #5038 注释警告过)。

转 needs-user-decision 2 条

• strictObject 的 history 句夹在「哪个键错了」与「该写什么」之间,在单行 error 显示位上把修法推到 222 字符之后(#5762 实测) #5955 → needs-user-decision + 改域 domain:devx → domain:spec。⚠️ 本轮唯一一处误标订正:原标按「lint / CLI 显示位」这个症状面打,但四条候选路线里三条(含立单人倾向的 A)落 packages/spec/src/shared/suggestions.zod.ts ⇒ 按 anchoring rule 归 spec,且触 packages/spec 依「shared contract surfaces have one owner」恒归 domain:spec 座位。旁证:同文件的 把 44 个 strictUnknownKeyError 直调点批量迁到 strictObject,棘轮降到 0(路线 1 消不掉手抄数组与 shape 的漂移) #5593 已带 domain:spec。进决策箱理由:影响 62 个 strictObject 站点 / 293 处 history: 声明,属对外授权错误契约的版式变更,立单人自陈「独立拍板」。四条路线与代价均在正文,决策卡已就绪可直接选。
• analytics 自动推断路径:measures 上的关系穿越点号 member 仍被剥成基表列 —— owner.region_count_distinct 静默聚合基表 region(#5739 裁决未覆盖的第四个铸造点) #5918 → needs-user-decision + domain:services(维持)。analytics 即席路径 measures 上的关系穿越点号 member 被剥成基表列 ⇒ owner.region_count_distinct 静默聚合基表 region,无 JOIN 无报错,调用方从结果看不出来。⚠️ 不得复制 analytics 自动推断路径:inferCubeFromQuery 的 stripPrefix 把关系穿越 owner.region 铸成基表列 region —— 基表恰好有同名列时静默筛/分组错列(两个策略、两个请求键均如此) #5739 的判定:那单裁 B 的依据(拒收会拒掉与已正确行为等价的查询)经立单人实测在 measures 上不成立。三问均改变对外可写查询形状,PM 不代拍。

四、发现分诊(2 条)

• drivers(sql): 共享 canonical 修复表达式把「裸数字文本」当儒略日读,backfill 会把这个误读写进盘里(观察项) #6009 — 读数订正(判级不变,finding 持有)。14:56:15Z 的分诊评论写「PR feat(driver-turso): remote 模式补 canonical 时间列 backfill 通道(分批、可恢复、完成标记) (#5770) #6006 仍 open」,而 feat(driver-turso): remote 模式补 canonical 时间列 backfill 通道(分批、可恢复、完成标记) (#5770) #6006 实际 MERGED 于 14:55:41Z —— 写下时已过期 34 秒。已按 notes 7 在同一公开位置更正:落盘面已在 main(⚠️ 但不触发重启条件 3,feat(driver-turso): remote 模式补 canonical 时间列 backfill 通道(分批、可恢复、完成标记) (#5770) #6006 正是原判已计入的那次扩大);重启条件 2 的前置「等 feat(driver-turso): remote 模式补 canonical 时间列 backfill 通道(分批、可恢复、完成标记) (#5770) #6006 落地」已满足。
• DbJobAdapter 把「handler 没抛错」记成 sys_job_run.status='success' —— 内部自行降级的 job(如 wait 唤醒打空)在作业审计面上仍显示成功 #5548 — 逾期复核 + 重启条件硬化。08-05 18:08Z 的判级明写「下轮分诊轮复核」,此后 ~26 小时无人复核。本轮复核:wrap() 与 JobHandler(仍 Promise<void>,无第三态)逐行实读一字未改,job 域自立单以来无改动 ⇒ 原重启条件未触发。但原条件「下一个 job 域改动时顺带定形」不可机械判定 ⇒ 已按「A hold without a restart condition is a state nobody can ever legally exit」硬化为三条(改到 wrap/bumpJob/JobHandler 即顺带走方向 C / 出现第二个同形 handler / 出现真实误判现场),并预判了方向 B 触 packages/spec 时应转 domain:spec 座位。

五、发现存量与阈值

仓	finding 存量	阈值 15
objectstack	40	⚠️ 超
objectui	11	未超
cloud	5	未超

⚠️ 一条给维护者的结构性观察:objectstack 的 40 条 已 100% 带判级评论且全部附重启条件(本轮逐条核过)—— 出水口没有堵,是入水速度的问题。⇒ 「> 15 即跑发现分诊轮」这条阈值现在每轮都会触发,但每轮能做的实质工作只剩「重启条件是否已触发」的巡检(本轮巡检了全部 40 条,仅 2 条有动作)。建议:把顺带职责从「存量 > 15」改成「存量 > 15 且存在未判级或重启条件已触发的条目」,否则阈值会退化成一个恒真的空转信号。请维护者裁一句。

六、⚠️ 一条状态机异常,已观察未处置(不属本座位授权面)

#5278 同时带 pm:queue + pm:dispatched + needs-user-decision。按 SKILL 的 label discipline,前两者与后者语义互斥(「决定待做」vs「已入队/已派发」)。读全评论流后判定这不是误标而是真实的复合历史:该单已派发、PR #5827 在飞,途中撞上引导期落地方式需维护者拍板(12:35Z 的 [决策] 评论,三选项已备)。⇒ 选择过滤器会因 needs-user-decision 正确跳过它,无实际危害;但队列视图里它仍显示为 pm:queue。

⛔ 本座位未改其标签 —— 该单有在飞认领与 PR,属执行座位领地。此处仅登记,处置权归 domain:spec-tooling 座位与维护者。顺带提醒:#5278 的 [决策] 卡自 12:35Z 起已等待 ~8 小时,而它同时是 #5826(TEST_DEBT tests 字段手写漂移)重启条件的前置 —— 一张卡挡着两单。

七、剩余未分诊存量

三仓按修正后口径(无 pm-state 即待分诊)全部 0 / 0 / 0,本轮末已复扫确认。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

分诊轮收尾(Routine trig_01XhwLupWiUBp7GUEigK1RFW,22:47Z fire)

处理 6 条,全部 objectstack:主分诊 0 条(三仓未分诊存量全程为 0)+ 发现分诊轮 6 条。⛔ 全程零 assign、零派发、零代码改动、零合并 —— 本轮 assign 数 = 0(试点判据 2 保持,6 条逐条写后回读确认 assignees = NONE、标签未变动)。

一、自退守卫:未触发(第一个子句即不成立)

上一轮收尾 21:03:30Z(20:47Z fire,落本贴),距本轮 fire 1 小时 44 分 ⇒ 超出 1 小时窗。⚠️ 记一条:21:47Z 那一轮未产生任何收尾简报(本贴评论流在 21:03Z 与本条之间为空)—— 与 08-05 18:47Z 那次同形,是本座位第二次静默漏轮,成因未知(调度器未 fire / 轮次中途死),提请维护者留意频次。

因第一个子句不成立,17:47Z 提出的那个解释问题(存量清零时守卫是否应按字面静默退出)本轮未被用到,仍悬而未决。

二、扫描(三仓全量分页,口径按 20:47Z 轮的修正版)

口径 = 无任何 pm-state 标签即待分诊(pm:queue / pm:dispatched / pm:on-hold / pm:blocked / needs-user-decision / finding);⛔ 单有 domain:* 不算已分诊(20:47Z 轮修正,黑洞面已清零并保持)。排除 tracking / status:parked / pm:seat / pm:epic / #4604 本身。

仓	open issue(已剔 PR)	未分诊	finding 存量
objectstack	339	0	40
objectui	59	0	11
cloud	47	0	5

⇒ 主分诊 0 条;objectstack finding 40 > 阈值 15 ⇒ 发现分诊轮触发(objectui / cloud 未达阈值,不触发)。

三、发现分诊轮:先做全量对账,再定本轮取样

40 条逐条读评论流(关键词族匹配 判级/持有/晋级/存量裁决/发现分诊),结论:40/40 全部已获判级,零条从未判级 —— 08-06 各轮已把「从未判级」这一类清空。故本轮的可用产出不在「补判级」,而在最久未复核的持有单的重启条件是否已触发,取最早判级的 6 条。

判级结果:6 条全部维持持有(晋级 0 / 关闭 0)。但其中 4 条的重启条件被改写 —— 这是本轮的实际产出:一个写得不可触发的重启条件,和没有重启条件是同一种病(SKILL:a hold without a restart condition is a state nobody can ever legally exit)。

重启条件已重新锚定 3 条

• ScriptContext.user 是 unknown —— 沙箱接缝上没有任何类型把 dispatcher 的 user 形状钉住(observation) #5521(domain:cli,ScriptContext.user 仍是 unknown)—— 旧重启条件的前置模子已落地:姊妹字段的收窄随 PR feat(runtime)!: action ctx.session 双发 positions(权威)+ roles(弃用别名) (#5613) #5991 于 15:06Z MERGED,script-runner.ts:54 现有 ScriptSession,同一 interface :86 仍 user?: unknown,相隔 33 行。⛔ 但本轮核出一条硬串行:priority:p0 在飞单 [runtime] ctx.user 的 roles 别名(值是 positions)没有关闭日期 —— #5613 给 ctx.session 装了迁移窗口,同名同值的 ctx.user 面仍是无限期别名(observation) #6011 正在重定形 ActorUser,而那正是本单两个写入方(body-runner.ts:315/:340)交付的形状 ⇒ 现在晋级是让 dev 在正在变的形状上钉类型。新锚定 = [runtime] ctx.user 的 roles 别名(值是 positions)没有关闭日期 —— #5613 给 ctx.session 装了迁移窗口,同名同值的 ctx.user 面仍是无限期别名(observation) #6011 落地 → 按 feat(runtime)!: action ctx.session 双发 positions(权威)+ roles(弃用别名) (#5613) #5991 同一测法跑 user 面。跨仓那一格本轮已顺带跑完(ScriptContext 在 objectui / cloud 零命中,阳性对照两仓 package.json 命中 objectstack),晋级时不必重跑。另点名一处比姊妹字段更复杂的差异:user 的写入方带 ?? …session?.user 兜底链,形状来源多一路。
• driver-memory 与 formula 对「字段没有值」给出三处不同答案:$notContains(null 值)、$exists(键在值为 null)、$nin(缺键) #5299(domain:drivers,「字段没有值」三格)—— 旧重启条件「随 driver-memory 解冻 / 退役批次补入」的两扇门已被同一条裁决同时关上:[裁决] driver-memory / driver-mongodb 投入冻结 —— 维护者 2026-08-05 口径（跨单锚点） #5499 于 07:18Z 裁定 A — 维持冻结、暂不退役,且退役若重议须另立 ADR-0087 程序。已把持有理由从「等一个批次」改为「N2/N3 两格的记账锚点」(自洽且可退出),退出条件 = [裁决] driver-memory / driver-mongodb 投入冻结 —— 维护者 2026-08-05 口径（跨单锚点） #5499 冻结口径被重议;⛔ 不设时间窗(冻结无限期,编日期只会制造假到期)。维护者可否决改判关闭。
• objectui: 两个 dataset 渲染器用逗号 join 维度「名字」列表来匹配 totals grouping —— 与 #5665 同族的最后一处拼接式 key(今天不可达) #5690(repo:objectui,pivot 名字侧拼接 key)—— 旧重启条件「那条线收敛处理时一并收编」已开动:同族值侧 objectui: pivot bucket id 把 null 维度值编码成占位符 U+2205,与「值恰好等于该占位符」的行仍会撞 #5666 已于 17:47Z 轮晋级 pm:queue(仍未认领)。本轮实测两单半径落在同一函数内的相邻行,新锚定给出两条可机械触发的路径(见下条)。

重启条件加了一个复查触点 1 条

• views: 数组的三个门形状判断不一致:栈级 schema 只收容器、授权 lint 按记录门映射、运行时注册循环全收 —— declared ≠ enforced 的「运行时更宽」向 #5320(domain:spec,views: 三门形状不一致)—— 旧重启条件「未知键静默剥离仍是全仓默认:把 #3405 的 strict 收紧从一个 schema 推广到整个可授权面(ADR-0078 完整性闸门) #4001 view 面批次开列时并入」有可达性风险:未知键静默剥离仍是全仓默认:把 #3405 的 strict 收紧从一个 schema 推广到整个可授权面(ADR-0078 完整性闸门) #4001 最后一次批次派发是 08-04 的批 19/20,自陈为「campaign 剩余 authorable strip 的最后两组」,其后无 view 面批次,伞单自陈「待终局重测后收口」。本轮不抢跑改锚定(伞单未收口,view 批次仍可能作为终局重测产物开列),但设了明确触点:未知键静默剥离仍是全仓默认:把 #3405 的 strict 收紧从一个 schema 推广到整个可授权面(ADR-0078 完整性闸门) #4001 关闭之时,若仍无 view 面批次,须当轮重新锚定,⛔ 不得让它继续挂在一个已经不会发生的条件上。

前提复核后原样维持 2 条

• automation/ 里还有两处 X / XParsed 未兑现:execution.zod.ts 的七对别名两边都是 z.infer,ScreenFieldConfig 缺 Parsed #5507(domain:spec)—— 两条事实在 main 上逐行复核仍成立(七对别名 :410–:416 全 z.infer;ScreenFieldConfig :407 仍缺 Parsed,姊妹项 :456/:502 俱在)。原文行号 304 已漂,更新为 :407。加性那一行不单独晋级的理由写在单上(占一次认领+PR+队列位不抵收益),留作过路单 rider 的现成依据。
• objectui: pivot bucket id 把 null 维度值编码成占位符 U+2205,与「值恰好等于该占位符」的行仍会撞 #5666(pm:queue,值侧)—— 非发现单,本轮只留派发前的撞车注记(SKILL step 3「延后/相邻单的坑要在派发前写到单上」):实测本单 DatasetWidget.tsx:117/118/485/487 + DatasetReportRenderer.tsx:755 与 objectui: 两个 dataset 渲染器用逗号 join 维度「名字」列表来匹配 totals grouping —— 与 #5665 同族的最后一处拼接式 key(今天不可达) #5690 的 :483 / :877 在同一段 totals 匹配逻辑内 ⇒ 建议认领方在同一个 PR 里收编 objectui: 两个 dataset 渲染器用逗号 join 维度「名字」列表来匹配 totals grouping —— 与 #5665 同族的最后一处拼接式 key(今天不可达) #5690;不收编则 objectui: 两个 dataset 渲染器用逗号 join 维度「名字」列表来匹配 totals grouping —— 与 #5665 同族的最后一处拼接式 key(今天不可达) #5690 转 pm:queue + Blocked-by: #5666。⚠️ 该注记不改本单任何标签、不构成认领。

四、队列健康:已核,本座位不重复处置

origin/main 自 15:14Z 起 7.5 小时未前进,而 gh-readonly-queue/* 有 5 条链上分支(#6030→#6029→#6032→#6045→#6012)。核队列管家座位(#6016 / 台账 #5810):管家 Routine trig_012yeNVMdFwXET5zvYQtUKXA 在岗且已诊断到位(第 18 轮 22:24Z,结论:平台事件派发面故障 + abandoned 聚合假红扩面至 Test Core + 一例零签名踢出)。⇒ 属该座位范围,本座位静默让行,不发重复评论。

⚠️ 顺带影响本座位判断的一点:队列停滞期间「入队即落地」的假设不成立,本轮所有「排在 PR #X 之后」的串行注记都应读作逻辑序,不含时间承诺。

五、一条待裁的措辞问题

15:25Z 的 PROTOCOL CHANGE NOTICE 第 3 条要求 GitHub 上的新评论改用英文,但注记同时说明「新条款自 PR #6029 合入生效」,而 #6029 至今未合(正卡在上述停滞的队列里)。本座位本轮沿用中文(与 17:57Z / 20:59Z / 21:01Z 各轮实践一致,且与本 Routine 的存储 prompt 一致)。若维护者希望在 #6029 合入前就切英文,请回一句,本座位下轮即改并写入本贴「说明」列。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-zhuang]

分诊轮收尾(Routine trig_01XhwLupWiUBp7GUEigK1RFW,00:47Z fire)

8 items handled, all in the findings half: main triage 0 (three-repo untriaged stock was 0/0/0 throughout) + findings triage 6 + 1 new issue filed + 1 cross-repo label-state repair. ⛔ Zero assigns, zero dispatches, zero code changes, zero merges — assign count this round = 0 (pilot criterion 2 held; every touched issue read back showing assignees = []).

0. ⚠️ Protocol change in force: this brief is in English

PR #6029 merged at 23:55:44Z, ~50 minutes before this fire. Its language policy ("all NEW issue/PR titles, bodies and comments in English") is therefore live, and the local SKILL.md at 1eb13a0 already carries the merged text — verified git diff HEAD origin/main -- .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md is empty, so this session is not running on a stale skill. The 22:47Z round's open question ("should we switch before #6029 merges?") is moot: it merged, so the seat switched.

Two Chinese anchor strings are deliberately preserved so the next round's self-retreat guard does not go blind:

• this brief's fixed opening 「分诊轮收尾(Routine …)」 — the primary guard reading;
• the per-issue footer 「本评论来自分诊座位 Routine(试点:分诊 PM 座位 Routine 化 —— 全仓唯一分诊者,cron 定时 fresh session,只标签不认领(#5472 模型第 5 点先行验证) #5474 试点),不构成认领」 — the documented fallback reading.

Everything else is English. ⚠️ The stored prompt for this Routine still specifies Chinese audit comments and a #4604 wrap-up location; both are now superseded by the merged protocol, and this round follows the protocol. The stored prompt should be updated — until it is, every fire re-derives this conflict.

1. Self-retreat guard: not triggered (first clause fails)

Previous wrap-up 22:58:03Z (22:47Z fire), this fire ~00:47Z ⇒ gap 1h49m, outside the 1-hour window. Second clause not evaluated.

⚠️ The 23:47Z round produced no wrap-up (this post's comment stream is empty between 22:58Z and now). That is the third silent skipped round — 08-05 18:47Z, 08-06 21:47Z, now 08-06 23:47Z — and the interval between the last two is one hour, i.e. consecutive-ish rather than isolated. Cause still unknown (scheduler did not fire / round died mid-flight). Three occurrences in ~30 hours is a pattern, not noise; flagging for maintainer attention since the seat cannot diagnose its own non-execution from inside.

2. Scan

Full pagination across three repos via REST (state=open, PRs filtered out), scope per the 20:47Z correction — no pm-state label ⇒ untriaged; a bare domain:* does not count as triaged. Excluded tracking / status:parked / pm:seat / pm:epic / #4604.

repo	open issues	untriaged	finding
objectstack	328	0	41
objectui	59	0	11
cloud	47	0	2

⇒ main triage 0; objectstack finding 41 > 15 ⇒ findings round triggered (objectui / cloud below threshold, not run).

3. Dedup close — #6090, a live lockfile-race risk

#6090 (dependabot banner: 7 vulns, 2 high / 4 moderate / 1 low, filed 00:32:41Z) closed as duplicate of #6088 (osv-scanner table, filed 00:15:59Z, already claimed at 00:30:52Z by session_01Wbxm29qPKnLf44AbSxizqW, branch claude/issue-6088-osv-jsyaml-mermaid).

The two reconcile row for row, not merely by total: js-yaml GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj at CVSS 7.5 against two resolved versions = 2 high; mermaid 6.5 + 5.3×3 = 4 moderate; mermaid 2.4 = 1 low. Verified independently against origin/main (1eb13a0) rather than taken from #6088's text — js-yaml@3.15.0, js-yaml@4.3.0, mermaid@11.16.0 all present in the lockfile; last lockfile commit 9c90ea0 (feat(sms), #6042), so no remediation has landed and both reports describe the same live state.

Why this mattered enough to act on immediately: #6088's declared file surface is pnpm-lock.yaml, the canonical never-parallelize surface (#5032 precedent — two re-resolutions produce mutually unmergeable diffs). An unassigned second entry for the same lockfile bump is exactly the shape that attracts a second claim.

⚠️ Recorded limitation: GET /repos/.../dependabot/alerts returns 403 Resource not accessible by integration for this seat, so the reconciliation is severity arithmetic + lockfile evidence, not an alert-list pull. Noted on the issue with a reopen invitation if anyone with Security-tab access finds an eighth alert.

⛔ Did not relabel #6088 (in-flight, another seat's claim). Recorded there instead: a pure lockfile bump lands in no domain package, so no domain:* is warranted — the maintainer routed it to the domain:cli lane directly.

4. Findings triage round — 6 graded, all hold, 4 with rewritten restart conditions

Zero promotions and zero closures this round; the output is condition quality. Per the 19:47Z reconciliation the pool is 100% graded, so the available work is exit-condition repair — and a hold whose condition cannot fire is the same disease as a hold with no condition.

• Node-level error branches: let a flow handle a failed node instead of aborting the run #3863 (services) — the old condition was "等 services 车道有 appetite", which nobody can evaluate. Measured all three v2 residuals against main: ③ label:'error' alias is settled won't-do (zero hits, and flows.mdx:869 states the opposite rule positively while v17.mdx:1365 lists it as a named author error — adding it would contradict shipped release notes); ② loop-back is answered, and more sharply than asked — detectCycles (engine.ts:4108-4112) skips only type==='back', so fault edges do get the same validation, but type is a single-valued enum (flow.zod.ts:440) ⇒ fault and back are mutually exclusive, so a looping fault edge is inexpressible and the rejection message at :4145 prescribes a remedy that silently discards the error-routing semantic. Direction is fail-closed (registerFlow throws), which is why it stays a finding. Only ① (does a handled node count toward flow-level retry) is genuinely live, and it is a decision card, not queue work. Three mechanical triggers replace the appetite clause.
• system/http-server.zod.ts 幸存导出 ServerEvent* / ServerCapabilities / ServerStatus 全仓零消费者 —— 响应/能力形状,ADR-0049 判定待做 #5295 (spec) — the blocking measurement is done. The hold waited on "does plugin-hono-server report these capabilities?" Answer: zero hits for ServerCapabilit|ServerStatus|ServerEvent in that package, falsified against a known-present neighbour (same package matches @objectstack/spec in adapter.ts:3, package.json, objectstack.config.ts). Everything naming these exports outside their own file is generated (reference mdx, api-surface/system.json:485-492, json-schema.manifest/system.json:222). Verdict unchanged (retirement is breaking, v17 window closed with system/HttpServerConfigSchema 九个键全仓零 reader,且没有任何作者面入口(defineStack 无 server:,不在 config-schema) #4938), but the v18 batch now starts at the three-way disposition instead of at a measurement.
• ADR-0087 里另外两处「松散键抬进声明块」的 lift 仍是无条件遮蔽 —— #4923 的按值裁决刻意没覆盖它们 #5732 (spec) — restart condition ① retired because it already fired, silently. It read "next time a conversions / ADR-0087 ruling batch opens"; 72c3c861 (refactor(spec)!: retire indexes[].type 与 indexes[].partial —— 两个零 DDL 消费者的声明键 (#5248, #4943) #5842/ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove:IndexSchema.type 与 IndexSchema.partial 没有任何 DDL 消费者 #5248, 2026-08-06 08:53:45Z, ~5h after the grading) touched conversions/registry.ts itself and did not take the question up. A trigger that depends on the next person happening to read this issue is the "靠人记得" mechanism rejected everywhere else — replaced with "anyone edits these lines" (registry.ts:1138-1143 / :1196-1202), which is verifiable after the fact. Condition ② (a real authoring surface producing loose+declared with differing values) stands as the true trigger. Holding cost remains ~0: PR fix(spec): ADR-0087 别名转换按值处置被遮蔽的旧拼法(等值删除、异值双留) (#4923) #5731's in-code rationale survives at :1174-1177.
• [观察,机制未确认] 对不存在的记录 id 走 action body 更新时,afterUpdate hook 的 condition 读 previous 报 400 HookConditionError,而非干净的 not-found #5571 (engine-core) — anchor drift corrected and the finding relocated into an existing ruling's family. sys_fetch_previous_update is at plugin.ts:863, not :846 (a dispatch on the old number lands in stampData). The handler guards on input.id being supplied, not on it matching a row, which is consistent with the report — though the real unanswered question is upstream (why the write reaches afterUpdate at all instead of failing not-found). The find: hook-condition-bulk-previous.test.ts [#5038] pins that the generic cel-fault.ts:136 "not bound for this operation" sentence must not be what an author is left holding — implemented for the batch path only. This observation is that same banned sentence on the single-id-not-found path. ⇒ likely an extension of a ruled, tested specialization rather than a new question. Repro is still owed, so still hold — but a near-free trigger was added: beforeUpdate hook 在 multi:true 批量更新上拿不到 ctx.previous —— sys_fetch_previous_update 依赖 input.id;引擎已为校验取 priorRows 却不喂 hook(17.0.0-rc.2) #5574 is now pm:queue/target:v17/unclaimed and its subject is this exact handler; its dispatch prompt should carry a must-answer that would be the reproduction. ⚠️ Ask before or during beforeUpdate hook 在 multi:true 批量更新上拿不到 ctx.previous —— sys_fetch_previous_update 依赖 input.id;引擎已为校验取 priorRows 却不喂 hook(17.0.0-rc.2) #5574, not after — its fix moves this surface.
• record:details 分区标题存在 title/label 双拼写:三个消费方都读 title ?? label,但 spec 只声明 label #5730 (spec) — checked, not triggered, no comment written. All three tolerance sites unchanged (last touches #5416/#5455, both predating the finding) and ?? title still live at i18n-extract.ts:401 / validate-translatable-sections.ts:329. ⛔ Deliberately did not post a "nothing changed" comment — re-grading with no new information is churn.

5. New issue filed — #6094 (pm:queue + domain:spec)

Found while confirming #3863's residual ③. The fallbackNodeId tombstone at flow.zod.ts:715 tells authors the engine routes via "an edge with condition 'fault'" — but the routing slot is type (:440); condition is a CEL predicate (:438). An author who follows the prescription lands an edge that parses clean, is not a fault edge, and carries a bare identifier where a boolean was expected — deleting a key that "silently did not exist" and replacing it with a second thing that silently does not exist, which is precisely what the tombstone exists to prevent.

:715 is the only occurrence of the wrong spelling repo-wide (positive control: type: 'fault' hits flows.mdx:864, bpmn-mapping.ts:269, flow.test.ts:1354/:1378), and the repo already names this mistake in flows.mdx:869 and v17.mdx:1365. Scope pinned to one string. Dedup run first across all three repos on fallbackNodeId / fault edge / retiredKey / errorHandling — #5606 is tombstone rendering (distinct machinery, no collision), #6081 is the same family but a different key and file.

6. Cross-repo label repair — cloud#1133

Carried pm:queue and finding simultaneously after the repo:cloud seat's 00:39:57Z promotion comment ("晋级 finding → pm:queue") applied the new label without dropping the old. Two mutually exclusive states at once: counted in the findings pool while sitting in the dispatch queue. Dropped finding; pm:queue retained. ⛔ The cloud seat's grading, chosen direction (修法 2) and dispatch notes are untouched — this is the mechanical half of that seat's own stated decision, not a re-grade. Cloud's findings round was not run (stock 2, far below threshold).

7. Standing rulings

• [裁决] driver-memory / driver-mongodb 投入冻结 —— 维护者 2026-08-05 口径（跨单锚点） #5499 (driver-memory / driver-mongodb investment freeze): no new issues in either family this round ⇒ not triggered; no pm:on-hold applied. [观察,机制未确认] 对不存在的记录 id 走 action body 更新时,afterUpdate hook 的 condition 读 previous 报 400 HookConditionError,而非干净的 not-found #5571 lands in packages/objectql, The fallbackNodeId tombstone prescribes condition: 'fault' — the migration it hands authors does not draw a fault edge #6094 in packages/spec — neither in the freeze surface.
• Domain table (docs(pm-dispatch): 协调模型改版 —— 分诊/执行纵向拆分 + 一人一车道双射 + 登记表正文即真相 + 座位 Routine 化 (#5472) #5522): all labels applied this round use the new table; zero domain:engine.
• spec seat's 15:49Z notice (never re-box a card without reading the whole thread for an existing ruling): no issue was moved into needs-user-decision this round, so not exercised.

8. Closing stock

repo	untriaged	finding	Δ this round
objectstack	0	40	41 − 1 (#6090 closed duplicate)
objectui	0	11	unchanged (below threshold)
cloud	0	1	2 − 1 (#1133 stale label dropped)

Three-repo untriaged stock 0/0/0, re-scanned at round end. objectstack finding still 40 > 15, so the findings half triggers again next round; per the 19:47Z/22:47Z reconciliations the pool is fully graded, so the next round's work is restart-condition checking, not re-grading — and this round found two conditions that were unfirable and one that had fired unnoticed, which is where the remaining value in that pool sits.

API: all REST (core 14966/15000 at close, no throttling). Dedup used the three-repo full open-issue cache plus local regex. ⚠️ Note for future rounds: the container's checkouts are shallow — this round deepened to 710 commits (--deepen=400) before any history reading, per the 19:47Z lesson.

本轮 assign 数:0。

本评论来自分诊座位 Routine(#5474 试点),不构成认领。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

分诊轮收尾(Routine trig_01XhwLupWiUBp7GUEigK1RFW,01:47Z fire)

7 items handled: main triage 2 (objectstack 1 / objectui 1 / cloud 0) + findings triage 4 (2 first-time gradings + 2 hold re-checks) + 1 cross-link. ⛔ Zero assigns, zero dispatches, zero code changes, zero merges — assign count this round = 0 (pilot criterion 2 held; every touched issue read back, and the one issue that does carry an assignee acquired it from another account, not from this seat).

1. Self-retreat guard: first clause TRUE, second clause FALSE ⇒ proceeded

Previous wrap-up 01:00:43Z (00:47Z fire, on this post), this fire ~01:47Z ⇒ gap ~47 min, inside the 1-hour window. The second clause failed on the facts: the scan found 2 new untriaged issues (objectstack #6099 filed 01:15Z, objectui #3507 filed 01:32Z), so "no new issues to scan" is false and the guard does not fire. No interpretation needed — unlike the 20:47Z round, this one did not have to lean on the still-unadjudicated reading of the clause. ✅ No skipped round this hour (00:47Z produced its brief).

2. Scan

Full REST pagination across three repos, scope per the 20:47Z correction (no pm-state label ⇒ untriaged; a bare domain:* does not count as triaged), excluding tracking / status:parked / pm:seat / pm:epic / #4604.

repo	open issues (PRs filtered)	untriaged at start	untriaged at end	finding stock
objectstack	313	1	0	42 → 41
objectui	61	1	0	11
cloud	47	0	0	2

objectstack finding 41 > threshold 15 ⇒ findings round triggered; objectui / cloud below threshold, not triggered.

⚠️ The GitHub search API is unavailable to this seat — repository-scoped sessions get This GitHub API path is not available. All dedup this round was therefore done by full paginated enumeration of open issues and PRs in all three repos plus local matching. Recording it so a future round does not read "no search" as "no dedup", and so the cost is visible: it is ~6 REST calls per sweep, well inside core quota (14,9xx/15,000 remaining at fire).

3. Main triage (2)

• objectui pin bump 生成的 console changeset 对破坏性变更零标注 —— digest 只认 major 声明级别,而 objectui 在 v17 窗口内把破坏性声明为 minor + 正文标注 #6099 → pm:queue + domain:devx. The objectui pin-bump digest counts a change as breaking iff its declared level is major (scripts/objectui-changeset-digest.mjs:297), while objectui in the v17 window ships breaking as minor + prose — so the warning at :345 can never fire. Landing site read from code, not the title: scripts/ (gate class) ⇒ devx, same row the SKILL puts the console pin/refresh script family on. Graded a defect rather than an observation because PR chore(console): 刷新 objectui pin 到 f995a452d2ca —— 98 个 commit / 64 条 releasing changeset / 2 项 v17 破坏性变更进入 v17 #6097 is MERGED, i.e. two unannotated breaking migrations are already in @objectstack/console's CHANGELOG input. Kept out of the decision box: direction 1 (also honour a breaking annotation the author wrote in the changeset body) stays inside bump-objectui.sh 的 pin changeset 只收 feat|fix 且静默截断到 40 条 —— 破坏性 refactor! 进不了前端发布记录 #4731's declaration over inference; only direction 2 (reading commit-subject !) needs the maintainer, so the dispatch carries a stop-and-return boundary instead. Extra finding for the dev: the script's own comment at :197–:201 asserts the opposite upstream behaviour, and its self-test only pins the major branch — a fix without a minor+prose fixture regresses silently.
• objectui#3507 → pm:dispatched (pm-state only; sibling-repo issues get no domain:*). Already claimed 01:36Z with PR docs+test: harden treatAsHistorical audit-timeline follow-ups (#3493) #3509 open ⇒ pm:queue would have advertised in-flight work as dispatchable. Checked the three transfer triggers — not feature-level, not cross-repo, no packages/spec — so it stays in the objectui whole-repo seat. Distinct from Flip webhook liveness ledger dead→live now that #3461 bridged the authoring surface (+ reassess type registration) #3490 (18 in-site route links vs. 2 off-site absolute URLs) and from objectstack#6028 (same failure family, different repo); cross-linked, not converged. Recorded that the deferred "direction 2" gate extension exists only as a promise in a comment — if PR test(dogfood): reclassify flow runAs as enforced in the authz conformance ledger (#1888) #3506 merges and no gate-extension issue appears, the next findings round should file it.

4. Findings triage (4)

First-time gradings (2) — both were filed within the hour and had never been graded:

• finding: pnpm override 台账两项体检事实 —— 26/28 条自失效上界形状、3 条 #5835 裁决范围外的空转 override #6095 (pnpm override ledger) — independent grading: promote. ⚠️ Mid-write, the cli lane claimed it: finding → pm:queue + pm:dispatched + assign at 01:55:08Z by qq9340100, this seat's domain:devx landed 01:55:14Z, their claim comment 01:55:31Z. Their scope carve-outs (better-auth 12 untouched, 3 idle overrides untouched) match what this round had independently written, so there is no disagreement and nothing was reverted. My comment was rewritten down to what their claim does not contain: the premise correction (the body says the check-override-consistency 增加「override 有无消费者」体检(报告而非 red)—— #5835 裁 A 的配套正交项 #6046 health-check landed — PR feat(scripts): check-override-consistency 增加 override 消费者体检与自失效上界报告 #6093 is still open, so CI is not yet printing these facts and the report cannot serve as before/after evidence), independent origin/main verification of the @hono/node-server@<2.0.5 → ^2.0.10 gap and the three idle entries, the lockfile-lane reading (all 12 open PRs checked; none touches pnpm-lock.yaml/pnpm-workspace.yaml), and a recommendation to put both maintainer questions on form-data 与 undici 两条 OSV override 失去唯一消费者,现在空转 —— 保留还是退役需一次裁决 #5835 rather than mint a second decision card.
• zodShapeOf 的 unwrap 面比三个同族 walker 窄:缺 union 分支与 prefault(#5317 修完管道方向后剩下的两格) #6098 (zodShapeOf unwrap surface) → HOLD + domain:spec-tooling. Observation grade verified rather than accepted: both gaps land in computeSurfaceReachability's fail-closed return 'root-graph', and that path only runs under authorable-surface 的 tombstone 门禁可被手编基线绕过 —— 删掉基线行就删掉了证据(#4638 / #4643 已两次这样过绿) #4650's deletion gate. Independently, PR fix(spec): zodShapeOf 按管道方向解 z.preprocess 的授权面(#4488 盲点的第四个现场) #6102 (draft) is rewriting the very file and test — queuing today would put a second agent inside a file in flight. Restart condition: fix(spec): zodShapeOf 按管道方向解 z.preprocess 的授权面(#4488 盲点的第四个现场) #6102 merges / build-schemas.ts 的 zodShapeOf 对 z.preprocess 走错管道方向(#4488 已在 check-liveness 修过的同一个盲点) #5317 closes ⇒ re-grade, promotion expected.

Hold re-checks (2) — the two least-recently-reviewed holds, both re-verified as still correctly held:

• record:details 分区标题存在 title/label 双拼写:三个消费方都读 title ?? label,但 spec 只声明 label #5730 — both restart cells re-checked and not triggered: all three tolerance reads still present verbatim, and every real record:details sections[] entry still authors label. ⚠️ The git log --since check was attempted and discarded — this checkout is shallow and returns the same boundary commit for every path (notes 6); presence-of-code is the reliable reading. Data point that strengthens the hold: the issue's "5 real sections" figure is stale, the surface is now ~12 across the same 4 files, and it produced zero title — the tolerant reads are demonstrably not breeding the PD Add comprehensive test suite for Zod schema validation #12 dialect. Also recorded a false-positive trap for the next checker (bare title: greps hit page:header and related-list titles, which are different properties).
• [spec] packages/spec/CHANGELOG.md 的 17.0.0-rc.2 段落仍带着「the server does not walk areas」—— GA 段落改对后同一文件会自相矛盾 #5809 — all three premises re-verified (still pre mode, no ## 17.0.0 heading, stale sentence at :87, changeset unconsumed) ⇒ the contradiction is still future-tense. The second restart branch is now the nearer one: [spec] #4610/#4535-C3 Notification 退役的墓碑与 changelog 需事实更正:objectui 侧确有 export … from 消费者;FROM→TO 指引会引导编译失败的替换 #5781 is open, pm:queue, unclaimed — one editorial ruling settles both, and that dispatch will likely precede GA. Cross-link left on [spec] #4610/#4535-C3 Notification 退役的墓碑与 changelog 需事实更正:objectui 侧确有 export … from 消费者;FROM→TO 指引会引导编译失败的替换 #5781 asking its dispatch to state the (a)/(b)/(c) policy explicitly; ⛔ no Blocked-by: — it is not a dependency.

5. Two items for the maintainer (neither actioned by this seat)

1. ⚠️ Rule-4 single-producer slip on finding: pnpm override 台账两项体检事实 —— 26/28 条自失效上界形状、3 条 #5835 裁决范围外的空转 override #6095. The grading (finding → pm:queue) was performed by an executing lane, and the claim landed six seconds before any domain:* existed — i.e. against an issue that was still untriaged by the queue's own definition ("未打标签的 issue 任何人都不得认领"). Outcome was harmless (both gradings agreed), so nothing was reverted, but this is the analytics dataset 路由的 message 正则兜底没有退休时间表:六族拒收仍靠措辞分类,改一个字就换一个 HTTP 码 #5367 mechanism, not a one-off: when the two graders disagree it costs a reversal. Flagged, not escalated.
2. ⚠️ domain:spec-tooling is in active use on six open issues but does not appear in the SKILL's domain table, whose domain:spec row reads packages/spec 及其生成物. This round followed existing usage (zodShapeOf 的 unwrap 面比三个同族 walker 窄:缺 union 分支与 prefault(#5317 修完管道方向后剩下的两格) #6098 matched to its parent build-schemas.ts 的 zodShapeOf 对 z.preprocess 走错管道方向(#4488 已在 check-liveness 修过的同一个盲点) #5317) for lane consistency, but a label the table cannot explain will eventually be applied two ways. Table gains the row, or the label retires — by PR either way.

6. Stored-prompt drift (unchanged since the 00:47Z round flagged it)

The Routine's stored prompt still specifies Chinese audit comments and #4604 as the wrap-up location; both are superseded by merged PR #6029 and the seat-post protocol. This round followed the protocol: English throughout, brief on this post, with the two Chinese anchor strings deliberately preserved — this brief's fixed opening 「分诊轮收尾」 and the per-issue footer 「本评论来自分诊座位 Routine」 — so the next round's guard readings do not go blind. Until the stored prompt is edited, every fire re-derives this conflict.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

分诊轮收尾(Routine trig_01XhwLupWiUBp7GUEigK1RFW,02:47Z fire)

15 items handled: main triage 10 (objectstack 4 / objectui 6 / cloud 0) + findings triage 5 (objectstack, all first-time gradings). ⛔ Zero assigns, zero dispatches, zero code changes, zero merges — assign count this round = 0 (pilot criterion 2 held; all 15 read back after writing, the only assignees present are pre-existing claims from another account).

Language: English per the policy live since PR #6029, with the two Chinese anchor strings preserved (this brief's fixed opening, and the per-issue non-claim footer). ⚠️ The stored Routine prompt still specifies Chinese audit comments and #4604 as the wrap-up location; both remain superseded by the merged protocol, and the stored prompt still needs updating — this is the fourth consecutive fire to re-derive the same conflict.

1. Self-retreat guard: first clause TRUE, second clause FALSE ⇒ proceeded

Previous wrap-up 01:59:36Z (01:47Z fire, on this post), this fire ~02:47Z ⇒ gap ~48 min, inside the 1-hour window. The second clause failed on the facts: the 02:49Z scan found 7 untriaged issues (objectstack 2, objectui 5), and by 02:56Z three more had landed. No interpretation needed — the still-unadjudicated 17:47Z reading of the clause was not used this round either. ✅ No skipped round this hour.

2. Scan

Full REST pagination across three repos; scope per the 20:47Z correction (no pm-state label ⇒ untriaged; domain:* alone does not count as triaged). Excluded tracking / status:parked / pm:seat / pm:epic / #4604.

repo	open issues (PRs excluded)	untriaged at scan	untriaged at close	finding at close
objectstack	310	4	0	44
objectui	66	6	0	14
cloud	45	0	0	3

Ten arrived inside this round's own window (02:01Z–02:56Z) — dev-side spillover from the objectui and devx lanes' current work. All ten triaged; nothing deferred to the next round.

3. Main triage — objectstack (4)

• Check Changeset 会因为「别人的 PR 合进了 main」而变绿 —— merge ref 里的他人 changeset 被算成本 PR 新增的 #6129 → pm:queue + domain:devx. The highest-severity item this round. Check Changeset turns green because someone else's PR merged into main: BASE_SHA is pinned at PR creation while actions/checkout@v7 gives the merge ref, so main's drift is counted as this PR's added changesets. Verified line by line on origin/main (:239 BASE_SHA, :271 --diff-filter=A, :218 default merge-ref checkout) — and one step worse than filed: :368/:371 hand the same BASE_SHA to check-empty-changeset.mjs --base, so the fix must cover both consumers. A false green with nothing downstream to correct it (contrast Check Changeset 从事件载荷读 skip-changeset 标签:开 PR 后 5 秒内加标签,首个 run 永久红(重跑复用载荷)—— 一日三例 #5580, which fails conservatively). Not target:v17 — internal tooling, not a shipped surface.
• AGENTS.md 的合并指引与 objectui#3243 同族过期:两处"绝不 gh pr merge --auto"禁令与 168 行的合并队列 hedge 互相矛盾 #6118 → pm:queue + domain:devx. AGENTS.md's two "never gh pr merge --auto" prohibitions contradict its own merge-queue hedge. Stale-premise check moved the anchors: the quoted lines 164/168/676 are actually 184/188/761 on main (two merges since). Gave the implementer one measured fact it would otherwise infer wrongly: this repo subscribes merge_group in 4 of 22 workflows, so unlike objectui it is not in the false-safety state — the rewrite must be driven by this repo's own measurement, in both directions.
• lint(devx): view/page 谓词(visibleWhen/visibleOn 等)的裸标识符构建期静态校验 —— #5149 裁决拆单 #6128 → pm:queue + domain:devx. The build-time half of Conditional-visibility predicates (visibleWhen / visibleOn) fail OPEN and silently — a broken predicate is indistinguishable from no predicate #5149's maintainer ruling (bare-identifier validation for view/page predicates). Anchored to packages/lint/src/validate-visibility-predicates.ts, not guessed from the title. Flagged same-package serialization against in-flight packages/lint 绕过 @objectstack/formula 直接 parse CEL —— 两个解析入口对「什么能解析」会给出不同答案 #4812 (pm:dispatched, lint's CEL parsing seam).
• 作者时表达式校验不认识平台注入列：record.owner_id == os.user.id 被判为 unknown field，最常见的归属谓词编译不过 #6113 → finding + domain:engine-core. Premise stale. record.owner_id == os.user.id was fixed by Author-time expression validator is blind to registry-injected system columns — record.owner_id / created_at / organization_id are rejected as unknown fields #5378, closed 14.5 h before this was filed — validate-expressions.ts:140 unions injectedColumnsFor(obj), showcase_field_zoo omits ownership ⇒ treated as 'user' ⇒ owner_id resolves, and action visible (:683) goes through the same index. What survives — /meta/object not publishing injected columns, so each consumer keeps its own guess — is already meta: /meta/objects reports field metadata from the build artifact, not the registry — created_at reads readonly: false while the write path enforces read-only #4513's stated fix. Converged rather than opened as a second entry.

4. Main triage — objectui (6; pm-state only, no domain:*)

• chore(deps)(deps): bump better-auth from 1.7.0-rc.1 to 1.7.0-rc.2 #3523 → pm:queue. Merge queue enforced but 0 of 22 workflows subscribe merge_group ⇒ required set necessarily empty ⇒ three PRs merged today with Type Check at failure (docs(audits): recheck the parsed-but-unenforced security props cluster (#1878) #3503/fix(runtime): notifications 域尾斜杠正则 polynomial-redos 修复（#3507 暴露的 CodeQL high） #3510/feat(spec)!: prune still-dead aspirational config from Theme / Translation / Webhook (#3494) #3516, 02:11–02:15Z), hot-fixed by fix(approvals+storage): decision attachments — name, open, correct download filename (#3504) #3505. Queued rather than escalated, on a deliberate split: steps 1–2 are pure workflow code and dispatchable; step 3 (writing contexts into the required set) is maintainer-only and already sits in their inbox as 红的 ESLint job 没有拦住合并:PR #5584 在 ESLint 已红 19 分钟的情况下过队合入 —— main 的 required-status-check 集需要维护者核查 #5617. objectui has no priority:p0 label and I did not invent one — severity recorded in the audit comment instead, treat as front-of-queue.
• chore(deps)(deps): bump @better-auth/sso from 1.7.0-rc.1 to 1.7.0-rc.2 #3521 → pm:queue. Record-header action predicates run objectui's legacy JS evaluator, so every CEL-only construct (.size(), .contains(), in, today()) throws and fail-closed hides the button — same predicate correct in the list, silently wrong in the detail header. Must not batch with feat(approvals): enrich inbox rows with payload_labels (snapshot field labels) #3501 (same two call sites; feat(approvals): enrich inbox rows with payload_labels (snapshot field labels) #3501 landed the binding half, this is the dialect half).
• feat(storage): 字段引用文件的独占所有权 — ADR-0104 D3 wave 2 (PR-3) #3527 → pm:queue. Docs teach VITE_API_URL / VITE_USE_MOCK_SERVER; the live variable is VITE_SERVER_URL (29 source hits, 0 mentions in content/). Flagged that VITE_USE_MOCK_SERVER is a different defect — it survives in vercel.json and four .env files with no code reading it, i.e. either a dead switch or a lost reader, to be settled by reading code rather than deleted silently.
• chore(deps)(deps): bump the production-dependencies group with 13 updates #3517 → pm:queue (claimed, draft PR chore(deps)(deps): bump better-sqlite3 from 12.11.1 to 13.0.1 #3526 in flight). Kept the "should there be a generic component-t()-key guard?" question out of the queued scope — it has a known false-positive class (I18N_PROBE_FLAG) and belongs in its own issue.
• chore(deps)(deps): bump chalk from 5.6.2 to 6.0.0 #3520 → pm:queue (claimed, draft PR chore(deps)(deps): bump @better-auth/core from 1.7.0-rc.1 to 1.7.0-rc.2 #3524 in flight). Classification only; label records state, assignee records the claim.
• chore(ci)(deps): bump actions/setup-node from 6 to 7 #3514 → finding. Premise stale in the useful direction: the body says turbo.json was outside the fence, but draft PR chore(ci)(deps): bump docker/metadata-action from 5 to 6 #3513 now carries turbo.json and adds $TURBO_ROOT$/vitest.config.mts to the type-check inputs — the exact one-line fix asked for. The residual (hand-maintained inputs list, drifted twice) is an explicit evaluation ⇒ held, with a promotion condition: chore(ci)(deps): bump docker/metadata-action from 5 to 6 #3513 lands and a guard shape is chosen, or a third drift appears. cloud#1133 is the same family one repo over.

5. Findings triage — objectstack (stock 47 > threshold 15)

The 22:47Z round established that the older stock is fully graded, so this round took the five never-graded findings (all comments = 0, all filed today). Every one got an origin/main premise check.

Promoted to pm:queue (3)

• finding(objectql): engine.ts 的 sys_file hydrate 读故障走 catch → return records —— 静默返回裸 id,零日志(#5979 实施期扫出,闸门词表外) #6116 → + domain:engine-core. engine.ts's sys_file hydrate does catch { return records } — bare ids, zero log, and consumers cannot tell a fault from "this record has no attachment" (ADR-0110 D3 family on a functional carrier). Invisible to check-durability-degradation-log-level.mjs because returning the input is outside the read-seam-invention vocabulary. Named location, one-sentence acceptance, no decision pending ⇒ not observation-class. Recorded that the neighbouring :3870 tri-state is already adjudicated as sound, so the next sweep does not re-open it.
• objectui-pin-freshness.yml 的注释在邀请把 Console Pin Freshness 加进 required 集,而它没有 merge_group 触发器——照做即合并队列全死锁(observation) #6121 → + domain:devx. Promoted on timing: objectui-pin-freshness.yml has no merge_group trigger while its own comment invites a maintainer to make Console Pin Freshness required — and the maintainer is mid required-set round. A one-line fix held through an active configuration round is the wrong side of that asymmetry. Standing ⛔ preserved: nobody adds that context until the trigger lands.
• errorResponseBase 的 err.code 落在 error.code 而非 error.details.code —— #5367 changeset 与 read-scope-sql.ts 文件头都把线上位置写错了 #6123 → + domain:services. The runtime is fine (err.code is promoted to error.code by buildApiError/splitSemanticCode), but one of the two wrong sentences lives in an unpublished changeset that ships into CHANGELOG.md — changeset prose is what an upgrading agent greps. Cheap now, an erratum later. Noted a third site the body missed: /analytics/query 仍把 RLS 策略字段名回显给调用方 —— read-scope 拒收的泄漏在姐妹面上没堵,#5367 只堵了 dataset 路由 #5811's issue body copies the same claim.

Held (2)

• v17.mdx 缺 rc.1 之后两次 console pin 移动的窗口段落(页面自述「that range needs its own section」未兑现) #6115 — the factual half is already closed by PR docs(releases): v17 升级指南收录两条 console 破坏性迁移,console 段 pin 区间推到 f995a452d2ca (#6106) #6109; what remains is release-note compilation, which CLAUDE.md's third rule puts at release time and out of code PRs. Restart: the v17 GA cut, or a third console-pin move making the range sentence false again.
• [finding] undefined 比较数在仓内有五种读法 —— #6050 只在 driver-sql/turso 落了拒收,formula 读作「键缺失」、read-scope-sql 编成 = NULL、driver-memory 读作 null #6125 — five readings of an undefined comparand. The proven-reachable cell is already ruled on (drivers: undefined 比较数被发射器读作 null、却被守卫/校验读作「值」—— turso local 抛裸 knex 错、remote 静默答 IS NULL(实测,origin/main) #6050 B-case); formula and read-scope-sql have no confirmed production caller, and promoting would settle driver-memory 与 formula 对「字段没有值」给出三处不同答案:$notContains(null 值)、$exists(键在值为 null)、$nin(缺键) #5299's key-missing-vs-null question by side effect and inherit a 400 envelope onto a platform-compiled 500 path. Restart: driver-memory 与 formula 对「字段没有值」给出三处不同答案:$notContains(null 值)、$exists(键在值为 null)、$nin(缺键) #5299 adjudicated, or a production caller demonstrated. Routing note recorded — on promotion it splits contract-first (formula ⇒ engine-core, read-scope-sql ⇒ services), it is not one cross-domain dispatch.

Freeze check (#5499, driver-memory / driver-mongodb): one drivers-family item this round, #6125. It stays finding, so no pm:queue entry was created and the freeze is not crossed; the hold comment records that the two frozen drivers stay pin-only, and that the post-#6050 divergence (memory answers ['3','4'] where sql rejects) is accepted debt owed at thaw time, not a regression. objectui / cloud: no drivers-family items.

6. Cross-repo note worth the maintainer's eye

Three items this round are one story: objectui#3523 (queue enforced, zero merge_group, three red merges realized today), objectstack#6121 (a workflow inviting a required-set entry it cannot satisfy), objectstack#6118 (agent-facing docs still telling agents the opposite of the sanctioned path). All three feed the required-set round tracked by #5617, and they are cross-linked to each other. The measured asymmetry — objectstack 4/22 subscribed, objectui 0/22, cloud already at the target shape — is in each comment so nobody generalizes one repo's ruleset onto another.

7. Stock at close

Untriaged 0 / 0 / 0. Findings: objectstack 44, objectui 14, cloud 3 — objectui is one below the threshold and will likely trigger its own findings round next fire.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

分诊轮收尾(Routine trig_01XhwLupWiUBp7GUEigK1RFW,03:47Z fire)

16 items handled: main triage 11 (objectstack 4 / objectui 7 / cloud 0) + findings triage 5 (objectstack, all first-time gradings). ⛔ Zero assigns, zero dispatches, zero code changes, zero merges — assign count this round = 0 (pilot criterion 2 held; every touched issue read back after writing, and the only assignees present are pre-existing claims from the yinlianghui account).

Language: English per the policy live since PR #6029, with the two Chinese anchor strings preserved (this brief's fixed opening, and the per-issue non-claim footer). ⚠️ The stored Routine prompt still specifies Chinese audit comments and #4604 as the wrap-up location; both remain superseded by the merged protocol. This is the fifth consecutive fire to re-derive the same conflict — the stored prompt still needs updating.

1. Self-retreat guard: first clause TRUE, second clause FALSE ⇒ proceeded

Previous wrap-up 03:01:36Z (02:47Z fire, on this post), this fire ~03:47Z ⇒ gap ~47 min, inside the 1-hour window. The second clause failed on the facts: the 03:49Z scan found 10 untriaged issues (objectstack 3, objectui 7), and two more (#6155, #6132) landed while the round was running. No interpretation needed — the still-unadjudicated 17:47Z reading of the clause was not used this round either. ✅ No skipped round this hour.

2. Scan

Full REST pagination across three repos; scope per the 20:47Z correction (no pm-state label ⇒ untriaged; a bare domain:* does not count as triaged). Excluded tracking / status:parked / pm:seat / pm:epic / #4604.

repo	open issues (PRs excluded)	untriaged at scan	untriaged at close	finding at close
objectstack	314	3 (+1 mid-round)	0	49 → 47
objectui	66	7	0	13 → 14
cloud	46	0	0	3

⚠️ The GitHub search API remains unavailable to this seat — repository-scoped sessions get This GitHub API path is not available. All dedup was therefore done by full paginated enumeration of open issues and PRs in all three repos. Recording it again so a future round does not read "no search" as "no dedup".

3. Main triage — objectstack (4)

• Schedule 触发器不携带任何 org 上下文——定时 runAs:'system' 清扫在多组织部署里仍会产出 organization_id=NULL 的行(#5494 的用户缺席半边) #6155 → needs-user-decision + domain:services + target:v17. The highest-severity item this round. Schedule triggers build their AutomationContext with no tenantId, so PR fix(service-automation): runAs:'system' 的 create_record 按 ADR-0118 染全三列——组织、属主、创建者禁 NULL (#5494) #6153's fix for Automation create_record under runAs:'system' inserts rows with owner_id/organization_id/created_by all NULL — records born untouchable even by admin #5494 ("stamp when the engine knows") closes the manual/record-change/api paths and leaves the dominant production shape — scheduled sweeps — still writing organization_id=NULL in multi-org deployments, where the (organization_id, …) unique index does not constrain across NULL. Decision box rather than queue because the body's four candidates differ in where the org is authored, not in implementation detail. On the release board under criterion ③ (stored-data shape, unfixable after the fact); noted that candidate 4 — publish-time lint, no new runtime semantics — is the cheap containment if the full decision misses the v17 window.
• celEngine 的 classifyError 把「括号/方括号不配对」这类真语法错答成 kind: 'runtime',而该 kind 会原样出现在作者可见的拒写消息与 REST 响应体里 #6133 → pm:queue + domain:engine-core. classifyError classifies CEL failures on error prose, so Expected RPAREN, got EOF matches none of the keyword branches and falls to the default 'runtime' — verified verbatim at cel-engine.ts:803-809 on origin/main. Unbalanced delimiters are among the commonest hand-written syntax errors, and the whole class lands in that hole. Not an internal field: kind is interpolated into author-facing rejection text (rule-validator.ts:1262/:1417, cel-fault.ts:75) and into the REST reason (rest-server.ts:571), so the author is pointed at their data instead of their expression. The freeze does not apply — [裁决] driver-memory / driver-mongodb 投入冻结 —— 维护者 2026-08-05 口径（跨单锚点） #5499 exempts formula. Routed by landing site, not by the title's REST vocabulary.
• FormField/FormSection visibleWhen describe 宣称 runtime 表单绑定 current_user,但字段级条件规则的求值面从未绑过它——按文档写的谓词必然 fault 并 fail-open #6146 → pm:queue + domain:spec + target:v17. Four strings in view.zod.ts (:1411/:1414/:1505/:1508) advertise record`+`current_user as the field/section visibleWhen root; no field-level evaluation surface binds current_user, so a predicate written from the docs faults and fails open. Queued rather than escalated because the contract question is already answered twice in the same direction (objectui#1582 pinned FIELD_RULE_ROOTS with an explicit "no current_user"; ADR-0068/objectui#2284 scope it to per-option visibleWhen) — direction 1 sits inside existing rulings. Direction 2 (actually bind it) is cross-repo and appetite-gated; explicitly not queued. Board membership mirrors Conditional-visibility predicates (visibleWhen / visibleOn) fail OPEN and silently — a broken predicate is indistinguishable from no predicate #5149, which already carries target:v17 for this same fail-open family.
• docs-gen: 无标题的 {@link ../x.zod.ts} 被渲染成「链接套链接」—— 2 张已发布参考页正文里能直接看到 #6136 → pm:queue; domain:spec-tooling confirmed as filed. Link-in-link render in file-description.ts (step 2's lookarounds exclude (/) but not [/]), visible today on two published reference pages. The premise had to be verified live: the file only exists because 两张公开参考页的正文被 #4001 的内部注释顶替(#3746 陷阱 1 已实际发生两次) #5059's PR fix(spec): 参考页开篇只认「不属于任何符号」的模块级 doc block (#5059) #6134 merged (52760bf) hours before filing. Presentation-only ⇒ not on the board. ⚠️ Serialization trap recorded: docs-gen: 模块 JSDoc 按行拆成段落,跨行的行内代码跨度被切断 —— 5 张参考页正文露出裸反引号和 \{ 转义痕迹 #5553 is a third independent defect on the same render chain — must not batch together.

4. Main triage — objectui (7)

Whole-repo seat ⇒ pm-state only, no domain:*. All seven checked against the transfer protocol (feature-level / cross-repo / packages/spec): none qualify, so nothing moved to the objectstack backlog.

• detail/form 面的 edit/delete 按钮接入服务端 effective 操作集 #3546 → pm:queue. 258 missing i18n keys; 8 render the raw key to users, two verified on the page (a toast whose || fallback is dead because i18next returns the key itself — truthy; and a Gantt aria-label read aloud as gantt.toolbar.refresh). Split declined, with reasons recorded so it is not re-proposed each sweep: the proposed namespace axis is a good review axis but a bad dispatch axis — all five sub-issues append to the same en.ts and the same ratchet file, so they serialize rather than fan out. Distinct from Console: modal-typed actions resolve target as an object — submit fails with GET /meta/object/<target> 400 #3530 (the gate's absence) and PR security 服务 getReadableFields 查询面(export 列投影的长期正解) #3547 (the gate); neither closes the other.
• 元数据不可解析时的 fail-open 残余风险评估(api-exposure / rest-server) #3545 → pm:queue. Three real dead links in the check-doc-links ∩ lychee blind spot. The filer could not run dedup (rate-limited at filing time) and asked this seat to finish it — done and recorded; no duplicate. ⚠️ Recorded trap: step 1 (the link fixes) is dispatchable now, step 2 (adding SCAN_ROOTS rows) edits the exact file PR feat(runtime): /automation 域 handler 体抽出 — ADR-0076 D11 步骤③ PR-6 (#2462) #3542 is rewriting. Not labelled pm:blocked, because that would hide an issue that is mostly unblocked.
• P2:ApiMethod 枚举收缩至 6 原语(breaking,独立版本) #3543 → pm:blocked + two Blocked-by: lines written into the body. Collides with two in-flight ACCEPTed PRs on two files: PR 用户级 export 权限轴(接入 P1 预留的 userExportAllowed 槽) #3544 owns console-architecture.md, and part one cannot be fixed without also editing console.md, which PR P0: collectRLSPolicies silently strips authored org-scoped RLS policies when org-scoping is inactive (ADR-0105 F1 → D3) #3539 owns. Not a duplicate of P0: organization_admin wildcard VAMA is contained only by the tenant wall — wall-less postures yield env-wide superusers (ADR-0105 F2 → D4) #3540 — different defect classes on the same page, carved out explicitly by both sides.
• feat(runtime): /packages 域 handler 体抽出（最大单域）— ADR-0076 D11 步骤③ PR-5 (#2462) #3537 → pm:blocked + Blocked-by: #3538. The lane PM had already graded it, but the ruling lived only in a comment — selection sweeps saw an unlabelled issue. Block verified against GitHub (PR feat(approvals): surface decisionOutputs keys on the request row (#3447 P2 UI enablement) #3538 open, merged: false), not taken on trust. Severity is raised by feat(approvals): surface decisionOutputs keys on the request row (#3447 P2 UI enablement) #3538 landing: once the wrong section is deleted, the page's guidance on API base URLs drops to zero.
• P0: organization_admin wildcard VAMA is contained only by the tenant wall — wall-less postures yield env-wide superusers (ADR-0105 F2 → D4) #3540 / feat(storage): 字段文件的受管下载 + R4 可执行验收门 — ADR-0104 D3 wave 2 (PR-4) #3534 / feat(runtime): /share-links 域 handler 体抽出 — ADR-0076 D11 步骤③ PR-4 (#2462) #3533 → pm:dispatched ×3. All three were claimed, branched and ACCEPTed with no pm-state label at all — the four-way blind spot this seat corrected its scan for at 20:47Z. State recorded, claims untouched.

5. Findings triage — objectstack (5, all first-time gradings)

Stock 49 > threshold 15 ⇒ triggered. objectui (13) and cloud (3) below threshold, not triggered. Distribution: promote 2 / hold 3 / close 0. Every hold carries an explicit restart condition.

• [skill] 拒收类用例必须断言 code+status,不能只断言「它抛了」—— 否则在裸 Error 的驱动上恒绿(#6142 实测) #6144 → PROMOTE pm:queue + domain:devx. A demonstrated false-green, not an observation: on driver-sql most rejection cases go red by throwing knex's bare Undefined binding(s) — code and status both undefined — so a test written as toThrow() passes on the very driver the fix targets. driver-turso remote is the control (never throws; all 20 red for the right reason). Scope guard recorded: the clause belongs in skills/**; retrofitting live suites is separate work.
• [finding] theme.zod.ts / chart.zod.ts 里那两段「本块之上不得出现 doc block」的 // 警告,在 #5059 之后已过时(保守但无害) #6137 → PROMOTE pm:queue, domain:spec kept. Premise confirmed live against merged fix(spec): 参考页开篇只认「不属于任何符号」的模块级 doc block (#5059) #6134. Promoted over the filer's own "harmless" grading because of a second half they under-weighted: the stale banners are the mechanism by which ui/theme and ui/chart may ship with no opening description — a published-output gap of the same class as 两张公开参考页的正文被 #4001 的内部注释顶替(#3746 陷阱 1 已实际发生两次) #5059, now fixable. Recorded that adding page prose is authoring and must be stated in the PR, not slipped in.
• formula 内部还剩第三个 CEL 解析入口:cel-to-filter.ts 自建 limitless env,与 celEngine 对「什么能解析」仍不一致 #6132 → HOLD; domain:engine-core added (was missing ⇒ outside every lane's view). A third CEL parse entry (cel-to-filter.ts) diverges from celEngine on all three DEFAULT_LIMITS axes, in the permissive direction, on a path whose output is pushed-down security SQL. Held on one missing measurement, not on interest: nobody has tested whether the ADR-0056 D4 shape gates admit an over-limit predicate that far. Restart: (1) that reachability measurement — non-empty result promotes the same round; or (2) anything else touching that parse path, so the file-header ruling rides along. Converging it silently flips over-limit predicates to fail-closed rejection on a security seam — a ruling, not a refactor, which is why PR refactor(formula,lint): parseCelToAst 成为唯一的 CEL 解析入口 (#4812) #6130 declining it in scope was right.
• [finding] @objectstack/http-conformance 对 IHttpServer.setFallbackHandler 零断言 —— ADR-0076 OQ#10 的落点仍空着 #6143 → HOLD; domain:cli added (packages/qa; was missing). Conformance suite asserts none of setFallbackHandler's four guarantees, but only one implementation exists, and the reference NodeHttpServer deliberately does not implement it — so assertions cannot come first without failing a compliant adapter. Real work is "implement on Node first, then assert", i.e. a feature PR closing a gap nothing falls through today. Restart: a second adapter implements the member (promotes immediately — post-E7(#5040 执行器):翻转 —— publish 硬拒收窄为「不支持子集 + 命名空间门」,声明式端点随 v17 放行执行 #5111 that seam is the only route for declarative apis: endpoints), ADR-0076 OQ#10 is taken up, or NodeHttpServer gains it for other reasons.
• [finding] ADR-0087 台账没有「完备性」门禁:已发生的退役漏登记时全仓全绿,只有人工能发现(#6011 即如此) #6148 → HOLD; domain:spec-tooling kept. ADR-0087's gates pin ledger↔artifact synchrony, so a never-written entry leaves both mutually consistent and every gate green — omission is structurally invisible, and the only detector that has ever fired is this seat's manual comparison (which produced [runtime] ctx.user 的 roles 别名(值是 positions)没有关闭日期 —— #5613 给 ctx.session 装了迁移窗口,同名同值的 ctx.user 面仍是无限期别名(observation) #6011, then a whole extra round to backfill via PR feat(spec): ADR-0087 台账登记 ctx.user.roles 的立即退役 (#6011) #6138). Not promoted because the gate cannot be specified until "what counts as a registerable retirement" is answered, and the hardest case is the one that just happened (retirement in packages/runtime, ledger in packages/spec, no schema to key off). Not escalated either: one occurrence is thin evidence for new gate machinery. Restart: a second missed registration (→ decision box as a design question), or ledger tooling taken up for other reasons. Standing note recorded — the manual cross-check stays part of this seat's sweep while the card is held, so the hold does not read as "nothing is watching".

6. Stock at close

Untriaged 0 / 0 / 0 across all three repos. objectstack finding 47 (still > 15 ⇒ findings round continues to trigger next fire); objectui 14, cloud 3 — both below threshold.

Carry-forward for the next fire: 26 objectstack findings have never been graded (zero comments) at the current burn rate of ~5/round; the three holds written this round are the first in a while to carry machine-checkable restart conditions, and the same treatment is worth extending to the older held cards whose restart conditions were re-anchored on 06 Aug.

本评论来自分诊座位 Routine(#5474 试点),不构成认领。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

分诊轮收尾(Routine trig_01XhwLupWiUBp7GUEigK1RFW,04:47Z fire)

7 items handled: main triage 0 (three-repo untriaged stock 0/0/0 throughout) + findings triage 7 (objectstack; 2 promoted, 5 held, 0 closed). ⛔ Zero assigns, zero dispatches, zero code changes, zero merges — assign count this round = 0 (pilot criterion 2 held; all 7 re-read after writing, all still unassigned).

Language: English per the policy live since PR #6029, with the two Chinese anchor strings preserved (this brief's fixed opening, and the per-issue non-claim footer).

1. Self-retreat guard: both clauses TRUE on the letter — proceeded on the standing reading

Previous wrap-up 03:59:46Z (03:47Z fire), this fire ~04:47Z ⇒ gap ~48 min, inside the 1-hour window (clause 1 TRUE). Unlike the last four rounds, clause 2 was also true: the 04:50Z scan found untriaged stock at 0 / 0 / 0 — no new issues to sweep.

Proceeded anyway, under the reading first used at the 17:47Z round and re-used at 22:47Z and 00:47Z: 无新单可扫 ≠ 无活可做. objectstack finding stock stood at 48, more than triple the threshold of 15, and the findings round is an explicit standing duty of this seat, not an optional extra. Retreating would have left the seat's one available task undone for an hour while the queue's only outflow stayed shut.

⚠️ Recording plainly, as prior rounds did, that this reading is still unadjudicated by the maintainer. It has now decided four rounds. If the intent is that a full-literal guard should retreat even with findings stock over threshold, say so and this seat will retreat instead; the fix is one sentence in the stored prompt.

2. Scan

Full REST pagination across three repos; scope per the 20:47Z correction (no pm-state label ⇒ untriaged; a bare domain:* does not count as triaged). Excluded tracking / status:parked / pm:seat / pm:epic / #4604.

repo	open issues (PRs excluded)	untriaged at scan	untriaged at close	finding at close
objectstack	309	0	0	48 → 46
objectui	61	0	0	12
cloud	46	0	0	3

⚠️ The GitHub search API remains unavailable to this seat (repository-scoped sessions get This GitHub API path is not available) — dedup and related-issue checks were done by full paginated enumeration plus direct issue/PR state reads. Recording it a third time so a future round does not read "no search" as "no dedup". Quota at close: core 14,999 / 15,000, GraphQL untouched at 5,000.

3. Findings triage — selection

Selected the 7 least-recently-updated finding issues, i.e. the ones whose held state was oldest and most likely to have gone stale. Every one got a stale-premise check read off origin/main (ee3bde1), not off the issue body — which is what turned up the two promotions: in both cases the restart condition had fired without anyone noticing, because a restart condition is only as good as the round that tests it.

4. Promoted (2) — finding → pm:queue

• gen:docs 内联形状里的长枚举不省略,单个类型单元格可达约 900 字符(BulkActionDef.params 实例) #5340 → pm:queue, domain:spec-tooling. gen:docs prints ~900-character type cells because formatType caps inline key count but never per-key type width. Its hold was conditional on 参考文档生成器把数值字面量 z.literal(2) 渲染成带引号的 '2',数值型联合被记成字符串型 #5729: take the elision as a rider, or keep waiting. 参考文档生成器把数值字面量 z.literal(2) 渲染成带引号的 '2',数值型联合被记成字符串型 #5729 landed (PR fix(spec): 参考文档生成器按 typeof 决定字面量是否加引号,数值字面量不再被记成字符串 (#5729) #6127, merged 03:14:32Z, 880d343) and the rider was not taken — verified in the tree, not from the PR text: format-type.ts:195 still joins every enum member with no cap. Promoted rather than re-held because the condition has now been tested twice and failed twice (6e82972 [docs-gen] 生成的 reference 把 retiredKey() 墓碑渲染成 any —— 嵌套两层时连 [REMOVED] 处方都没有,退役键读起来像自由槽 #5606/fix(spec): docs-gen 把 retiredKey() 墓碑渲染成 never,而不是 any (#5606) #6058 and 880d343 参考文档生成器把数值字面量 z.literal(2) 渲染成带引号的 '2',数值型联合被记成字符串型 #5729/fix(spec): 参考文档生成器按 typeof 决定字面量是否加引号,数值字面量不再被记成字符串 (#5729) #6127 both passed through this file); a condition two qualifying events did not trigger is an indefinite hold wearing an exit. Same-file serialization is now clear — 参考文档生成器把数值字面量 z.literal(2) 渲染成带引号的 '2',数值型联合被记成字符串型 #5729 and gen:docs 给「元素是联合类型」的数组少了括号,164 处参考页单元格声明了另一种类型(string | number[] ≠ (string | number)[]) #5338 are both closed, no open issue lands in that file.
• [finding] TEST_DEBT 的 tests 字段是闸门自己已经算出来的数字,却手写在台账里 —— 19 条中 12 条已漂(runtime 记 66,实测 101) #5826 → pm:queue, domain:spec-tooling. TEST_DEBT's hand-written tests count duplicates a number the gate already derives. Blocker [finding] DEBT ledger counts in check-type-check-coverage.mjs drift silently — @objectstack/metadata-protocol records 28, actually reports 63 #5278 is closed/completed (5e1ea65), and the premise survives it intact: the 19 hand-written tests: entries are still in check-type-check-coverage.mjs, and evaluate() still never compares them to pkg.testFiles (its only derived-count reads are :800 and :820, neither an equality assertion). [finding] DEBT ledger counts in check-type-check-coverage.mjs drift silently — @objectstack/metadata-protocol records 28, actually reports 63 #5278 refreshed the 12 drifted values but left the mechanism, so the ledger restarts drifting with the next test file. Direction pre-selected (option 1, derive and delete the field) because options 2–4 were argued down at filing with no live advocate — option 2 would bill a green action, which contradicts [finding] DEBT ledger counts in check-type-check-coverage.mjs drift silently — @objectstack/metadata-protocol records 28, actually reports 63 #5278's own 改善不得制造记账 churn ruling.

Neither is target:v17 — both are internal tooling, no shipped surface.

5. Held (5) — each with its restart condition re-tested, not carried forward on trust

• finding(objectql): reap 的每轮上限是「按 (对象, where 作用域)」计的 —— N 个租户覆写把一轮的实际预算变成 (N+1) × 10000 行 #5756 (domain:engine-core) — reap's per-sweep budget is counted per (object, scope). Premise re-verified line-for-line (:324/:325 constants, the per-call loop at :1209, the "bound one sweep's work" promise at :30–:31); the only commit on that file since is db0d53c, a different code path. Both hold reasons intact: unreachable (tenant retention overrides not deployed) and the open question is a semantic choice pointing two ways. Refreshed: sibling finding(objectql): Archiver 的 20 批循环不看 #4747 的 abort 位 —— teardown 期间仍会继续读写正在关闭的 datasource #5755 is closed, so no serialization left.
• automation: ActionDescriptor.supportsPause / isAsync 是零读者的声明字段 —— 引擎判定「暂停」的唯一事实是 execute() 返回的 suspend: true #5703 (domain:spec) — supportsPause / isAsync, runtime half. Restart condition materially weakened and re-anchored: automation: resumeAuthority defaults to 'any', so every future pausing node ships fail-open — ADR-0044 says this is "tracked separately" and nothing tracks it #5561 has moved to pm:on-hold, so the "services lane invests in a consistency check" clause has lost its carrier and should only count if that lane opens its own issue. Re-anchored to the v18 retirement batch, processed together with system/http-server.zod.ts 幸存导出 ServerEvent* / ServerCapabilities / ServerStatus 全仓零消费者 —— 响应/能力形状,ADR-0049 判定待做 #5295 — same shape, and judging them apart yields inconsistent verdicts on one question.
• gen:openapi 产物被运行时读盘但无任何门禁——缺失时 /openapi.json 静默 503,check:generated 自报「Generated but ungated」 #5757 (domain:spec) — gen:openapi's artifact is read at runtime with no gate. Premise confirmed in-tree three ways (build-openapi.ts:150, openapi-self-consistency.ts:8–:10, rest-server.ts:3182+). Blocker gen:schema rmSync 整个 json-schema/ 会顺手抹掉 gen:openapi 的产物,rest 的 openapi 路由测试随后 503 假红——check:generated 原地跑 build-schemas 也触发 #5371 has not landed — still open, pm:queue, unassigned since 08-05. Restart condition hardened with an exit, because two facts weaken the old one: the landing sites are disjoint files (build-schemas.ts vs the gate list in check-generated.ts:235), and "wait for a queued item nobody claimed" has no deadline. New condition: gen:schema rmSync 整个 json-schema/ 会顺手抹掉 gen:openapi 的产物,rest 的 openapi 路由测试随后 503 假红——check:generated 原地跑 build-schemas 也触发 #5371 lands (re-check as before) or gen:schema rmSync 整个 json-schema/ 会顺手抹掉 gen:openapi 的产物,rest 的 openapi 路由测试随后 503 假红——check:generated 原地跑 build-schemas 也触发 #5371 is still undispatched two findings rounds from now (promote independently) — whichever fires first.
• check:dev-prereqs 只判 dist 存在性,#5726 的「陈旧 dist」那半边仍无门禁 —— 而绿灯现在会提供反向保证 #5864 (domain:devx) — check:dev-prereqs gates dist existence, not freshness. Confirmed the cheapest of three directions already landed (:222 now reads "existence, not freshness"), and the remaining two are genuine design choices needing measured false-positive rates. Still a documented side effect, not a broken invariant — no restore-invariant exposure. Siblings check-i18n-coverage 也是「声明了但没强制」的构建前置 —— 未构建时抛未捕获异常，并把成因指向 examples/app-crm 的配置 #5862 and objectstack dev 在工作区未构建时刷 12 段无关命令的 MODULE_NOT_FOUND，唯一可执行的那条却指向错误修法 #5726 both closed, so the hold is on substance, not traffic.
• 观察:guard-main-checkout-bash.sh 的逐字符分词对超长单 token 是超线性的(16KB 起约 1.5s,64KB 超 20s)——现实命令形状不触发 #5883 (domain:devx) — superlinear tokenizer in guard-main-checkout-bash.sh. File untouched since filing; condition 1 (a real ten-thousand-character single-token call shape) actively re-tested and still unfired. Held rather than closed because reachability is a property of today's call shapes, and closing would discard a measured curve with a working repro. Cross-repo twin (objectui, byte-identical port) recorded here as the single entry point.

6. Remaining stock

Untriaged 0 / 0 / 0. objectstack finding 46 — still over the threshold of 15, so the findings round stays in the insert-ahead position next fire; objectui (12) and cloud (3) remain below threshold and were not triggered. No driver-memory / driver-mongodb new issues this round, so the #5499 freeze did not need to be applied.

7. Standing item for the maintainer — sixth consecutive fire

⚠️ The stored Routine prompt is still out of date and every round re-derives the same three conflicts: it specifies Chinese audit comments (superseded by the English policy in PR #6029), names #4604 as the wrap-up location (superseded by the seat-post protocol — briefs go here, #6015), and its self-retreat guard has the unadjudicated clause discussed in §1. All three are working correctly by override, but a fresh session that trusted the prompt literally would get all three wrong.

本评论来自分诊座位 Routine(#5474 试点),不构成认领。

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

分诊轮收尾(Routine trig_01XhwLupWiUBp7GUEigK1RFW,05:47Z fire)

5 items handled: main triage 0 (three-repo untriaged stock 0/0/0 throughout) + findings triage 5 (objectstack; 3 promoted, 1 held, 1 closed). ⛔ Zero assigns, zero dispatches, zero code changes, zero merges — assign count this round = 0 (pilot criterion 2 held; all 5 re-read after writing, all still unassigned).

Language: English per the policy live since PR #6029, with the two Chinese anchor strings preserved (this brief's fixed opening, and the per-issue non-claim footer).

1. Self-retreat guard — same call as the last five rounds, same caveat

Previous wrap-up 04:56:26Z (04:47Z fire), this fire ~05:47Z ⇒ gap ~51 min, inside the 1-hour window (clause 1 TRUE). The 05:50Z scan found untriaged stock at 0 / 0 / 0, so clause 2 was TRUE as well.

Proceeded, under the standing reading first used at 17:47Z: 无新单可扫 ≠ 无活可做. objectstack finding stock stood at 48, more than triple the threshold of 15, and the findings round is an explicit standing duty of this seat.

⚠️ Still unadjudicated by the maintainer — this reading has now decided five rounds. One sentence in the stored prompt settles it either way.

2. Scan

Full REST pagination across three repos. Untriaged rule per the 20:47Z correction: no pm-state label ⇒ untriaged; a bare domain:* does not count as triaged. Excluded tracking / status:parked / pm:seat / pm:epic / #4604.

repo	open issues (PRs excluded)	untriaged	finding before → after
objectstack	308	0	48 → 44
objectui	58	0	12 (below threshold)
cloud	47	0	3 (below threshold)

⚠️ The GitHub search API remains unavailable to this session (sessions are bound to their configured repositories). Dedup was done by full REST enumeration of all open issues + all 6 open PRs in each repo and local pattern matching — slower, but it reads every candidate rather than a relevance ranking.

3. This round's method: grade by restart condition, not by re-reading the oldest

The 44 remaining findings have all been graded at least once, most within the last 24 h and each with an explicit restart condition. Re-reading the least-recently-touched ones would have produced five re-affirmations and no state change. So this round did two things instead:

1. Graded the ungraded. Three findings had zero triage comments — finding: strictness 台账分类表的 no gate 两个范例都已改判,但表里仍写成该类的现役人口(全树 no gate = 0) #6161, 事务句柄没有属主可查,同源校验对「引擎没开过的句柄」只能弃权(#5351 的已知边界) #6167, ScopedContext.transaction 不 join ambient 事务 —— 沙箱 hook 体里的 ctx.api.transaction() 会在事务中再开一个事务(违反 ADR-0067 D2) #6168, all filed in the last two hours.
2. Machine-checked every hold's restart condition for having fired: extracted the #N references from each finding's latest verdict and resolved their current state. Two had fired unnoticed ([finding][drivers] 五个驱动的 find/count/… 仍声明 query: QueryAST，而调用方已可省略 object —— 双变让它编译，但声明开始说谎 #6075, 观察项:json-schema.manifest.json 没有 #4662 那样的「整文件规范形态」比对 —— 不改变键集的手编至今无人可见 #5972); both are actioned below. This check is cheap and mechanical and is worth making standing — a hold whose trigger has fired is indistinguishable, in the queue view, from one whose has not.

4. Verdicts

#	verdict	landing site	why
#6168	promote → pm:queue + pm:blocked	packages/objectql/src/engine.ts:7278	ScopedContext.transaction() has no ADR-0067 D2 ambient join; the engine face has one at :6665. Not a declared boundary — the method's own TSDoc at :7269 claims it carries both declared caveats and never mentions join. Restore-invariant: inner txn commits, outer rolls back, inner writes survive, nothing reports. Blocked-by: #6171 written into the body
#6161	promote → pm:queue	docs/audits/2026-07-unknown-key-strictness-ledger.md:71	The no gate definition cell still names both exemplars in the present tense as "the largest class in ui/"; both left the class (#5020 / #5068) and the generated subtotals read 0 in all five buckets. no door and no gate prescribe opposite actions, so this misroutes in the destructive direction. No gate catches it
#6075	promote → pm:queue	packages/drivers/driver-sql/src/sql-driver.ts	Restart condition fired: PR #6076 merged as 6513c17. Re-priced — scope is much smaller than the old verdict framed it (see §5)
#5972	close (completed)	—	Restart condition fired and overshot: #5837's reshard made the manifest comparison byte-exact per shard, closing all three named blind spots for free. The monolith the finding is about no longer exists
#6167	hold	packages/objectql/src/engine.ts:950	Sibling of #6168 and the mirror case: this boundary is declared (the txStore scope doc says the trio never enters the store). Closing it is an IDataDriver contract change with three shapes and no consumer pull. ⛔ Not needs-user-decision — nothing is pending on the maintainer; the decision was made and ships in #6171

5. Two things worth the maintainer's eye

(a) #6075 was re-priced downward, and the old estimate would have caused work. The 08-06 verdict scoped it as three packages' signatures plus a turso any cleanup. Measured against main: SqliteWasmDriver and TursoDriver both extends SqlDriver and own zero sites; turso's five QueryAST hits are doc comments and error strings naming QueryASTSchema, which is still the correct spec name and ⛔ must not be "fixed". Real scope: one file, 10 sites. This is the SKILL's 「阻塞解除后要给延后的那一单重新定价」 working as intended — the promotion comment carries the correction so the dev does not inherit the stale estimate.

(b) The freeze needed an explicit acceptance criterion, not just an exclusion. #6075's stale signature also exists in driver-memory (4 sites) and driver-mongodb (6 sites), both frozen under #5499. Excluding them is not enough: a dev who greps packages/drivers will read the job as unfinished — or finish it, breaching the freeze. The promotion comment therefore states the criterion as "every non-frozen implementation matches the contract" rather than "no QueryAST remains". Worth generalizing: a partial-scope promotion under a freeze needs its acceptance criterion written in the negative space, or the freeze leaks through a well-meaning dev.

6. Notes carried forward

• ScopedContext.transaction 不 join ambient 事务 —— 沙箱 hook 体里的 ctx.api.transaction() 会在事务中再开一个事务(违反 ADR-0067 D2) #6168 must re-verify after fix(objectql)!: 事务句柄不再跨数据源穿透 —— 业务写响亮拒绝、系统账本移出事务落盘 (#5351) #6171 merges. Two stacked open drafts (feat(spec,objectql): transaction 契约收紧第一批 —— opts.require fail-closed 与 owned 信号 (#5696) #6165 → main, fix(objectql)!: 事务句柄不再跨数据源穿透 —— 业务写响亮拒绝、系统账本移出事务落盘 (#5351) #6171 → feat(spec,objectql): transaction 契约收紧第一批 —— opts.require fail-closed 与 owned 信号 (#5696) #6165's head) carry ~280 lines of change to engine.ts's transaction paths. The join branch may need to sit differently once fix(objectql)!: 事务句柄不再跨数据源穿透 —— 业务写响亮拒绝、系统账本移出事务落盘 (#5351) #6171's same-origin scope machinery is in.
• 事务句柄没有属主可查,同源校验对「引擎没开过的句柄」只能弃权(#5351 的已知边界) #6167 and ScopedContext.transaction 不 join ambient 事务 —— 沙箱 hook 体里的 ctx.api.transaction() 会在事务中再开一个事务(违反 ADR-0067 D2) #6168 are coupled and were deliberately graded apart. ScopedContext.transaction 不 join ambient 事务 —— 沙箱 hook 体里的 ctx.api.transaction() 会在事务中再开一个事务(违反 ADR-0067 D2) #6168's dispatch carries a flagged PM mechanism assumption (that a txStore.getStore() read cannot see a trio handle, per the :958 doc) marked must be measured, falsification welcome. Its answer is also restart condition (a) for 事务句柄没有属主可查,同源校验对「引擎没开过的句柄」只能弃权(#5351 的已知边界) #6167 — so 事务句柄没有属主可查,同源校验对「引擎没开过的句柄」只能弃权(#5351 的已知边界) #6167's trigger resolves itself as a by-product, with nobody re-deriving it.
• domain:spec seat ([PM seat] domain:spec — ⏹️ os-warren 已收班 2026-09-14T15:3xZ · 2 landed(#17928→cb1f2743 · #17469→d285bf0f)· 立卡 4 · ⏰ #17396 等维护者确认 release note 修正,且 #17076 先别合 #6017) is ⏸️ paused as of ~05:5xZ per the maintainer's rc.4 instruction; finding: strictness 台账分类表的 no gate 两个范例都已改判,但表里仍写成该类的现役人口(全树 no gate = 0) #6161 routes there and will wait for resume. Labeling records routing; scheduling is that seat's call.
• Attribution caveat recorded on 观察项:json-schema.manifest.json 没有 #4662 那样的「整文件规范形态」比对 —— 不改变键集的手编至今无人可见 #5972: git log -- <path> on the resharded manifest points at a commit whose subject is about SMS quotas — merge-queue batching makes single-commit attribution unreliable. That verdict rests on the tree state, not a commit message.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

分诊轮收尾(Routine trig_01XhwLupWiUBp7GUEigK1RFW,06:47Z fire)

5 items handled, all objectstack, all in the findings half: main triage 0 (three-repo untriaged stock 0/0/0 throughout) + findings triage 5 (4 promoted, 1 held, 0 closed). ⛔ Zero assigns, zero dispatches, zero code changes, zero merges — assign count this round = 0 (pilot criterion 2 held; all 5 read back after writing, all still assignees: []).

Language: English per the policy live since PR #6029, with the two Chinese anchor strings preserved (this brief's fixed opening, and the per-issue non-claim footer).

1. Self-retreat guard — both clauses TRUE, proceeded on the standing reading (7th round)

Previous wrap-up 06:01:39Z (05:47Z fire), this fire ~06:47Z ⇒ gap ~47 min, inside the 1-hour window (clause 1 TRUE). The 06:49Z scan found untriaged stock at 0 / 0 / 0, so clause 2 was TRUE as well.

Proceeded under the standing reading first used at 17:47Z: 无新单可扫 ≠ 无活可做. objectstack finding stock stood at 43, ~3× the threshold of 15, and the findings round is an explicit standing duty of this seat. No round was in flight (the previous one wrapped 47 min ago), so round mutual-exclusion — the guard's stated purpose — was never at risk.

⚠️ Still unadjudicated. This reading has now decided seven consecutive rounds. One sentence in the stored prompt settles it either way. A push notification was sent to the maintainer this round — the flag had been recorded only here, where nobody reads it live, which is why six rounds of flagging changed nothing.

2. Scan

Full REST pagination across three repos (no search — see the note below). Untriaged rule: no pm-state label ⇒ untriaged; a bare domain:* does not count. Excluded tracking / status:parked / pm:seat / pm:epic / #4604.

repo	untriaged	finding stock	threshold action
objectstack	0	43 → 39	over threshold ⇒ findings round run
objectui	0	12	below 15, no round
cloud	0	3	below 15, no round

Dedup / serial check by full enumeration of all 5 open PRs (#6171, #6165, #6164, #6160, #4935): none touches any of this round's four landing sites.

3. Method: the mechanical restart-condition check, made standing

Continuing the 04:47Z round's method rather than re-reading the least-recently-touched findings (which produces re-affirmations and no state change): for all 43 findings, extract every #N from the latest verdict comment, resolve each reference's current state, and flag any that closed after that verdict was written. Nine findings surfaced; five survived reading the actual restart-condition text (the other four referenced items that were cross-links, not triggers — #6074, #5949, #5930, and one already accounted for).

This check is cheap, mechanical, and catches the failure mode where a hold whose trigger has fired is indistinguishable, in the queue view, from one whose has not.

4. Verdicts

#	verdict	trigger that fired	landing site / why
#6098	promote → pm:queue	PR #6102 merged 03:37:02Z, #5317 closed 03:37:03Z — both halves of the recorded condition	packages/spec/scripts/lib/zod-graph.ts. Both gaps still stand on main: zodShapeOf (:165) has no union arm, and SHAPE_WRAPPER_TYPES (:87) lacks prefault while sibling walker check-liveness.mts:225 unwraps it. The merged code at :83-86 explicitly names this issue as the owner of the remainder ("filed as its own finding, not smuggled in here"). The in-flight-file serial reason for the hold is gone
#5521	promote → pm:queue	#6011 closed 01:25:53Z via PR #6048 — the producer shape stopped moving	packages/runtime/src/sandbox/script-runner.ts:86 still user?: unknown while the sibling session is typed at :119. Cross-repo cell already measured (zero hits in objectui/cloud, with positive control) and carried forward so the dispatch does not redo it
#6040	promote → pm:queue	PR #6042 merged 23:56:04Z and the measurement it demanded now confirms the cost	packages/plugins/plugin-auth. service-sms deps now carry @objectstack/plugin-auth (absent last round — that read was half the reason to hold); plugin-auth pulls better-auth@1.7.0-rc.2 + 4 @better-auth/* + jose + @noble/hashes, and exports is still "." alone. Selects direction 1 (add a ./rate-limit-storage subpath), not the 4-consumer migration
#6033	promote → pm:queue	PR #6032 merged 23:55:44Z	scripts/check-i18n-coverage.mjs. #6032 narrowed but did not resolve it: checkCliBuildPrerequisite() (:349-363) answers only CLI not built; the example's own deps unbuilt cause still exits via bare throw (:178/:183/:185) from an unguarded loop (:367-369), so the errors[] collector (:380-411) is never reached. Now cheaper than when filed — both halves the fix needs already exist on main
#6125	hold (unchanged)	neither condition fired — #5299 still open + finding (unadjudicated); no production caller demonstrated	Recorded instead a consequence that came true: #6050 closed 04:02:06Z, so the predicted driver-memory vs driver-sql divergence is live, not prospective. #5499 freeze keeps those cells pin-only; this issue stays the standing record for thaw time

None of the four promotions is in the frozen driver-memory / driver-mongodb family, so #5499 was not engaged. ⛔ No target:<major> applied — each verdict records why against the binary criterion (fail-closed tombstone path; sandbox-seam type gap; packaging weight; a path CI never reaches).

5. Standing notes

• The GitHub search API remains unavailable to this session (sessions are bound to their configured repositories). Dedup is done by full REST enumeration of every open issue and PR in each repo plus local pattern matching — slower, but it reads every candidate rather than a relevance ranking.
• Write-back check: all five comment bodies re-read from the API and compared to source — identical character counts, no sanitizer loss; the only delta is GitHub normalising a trailing blank line before the footer.

本评论来自分诊座位 Routine(#5474 试点),不构成认领。

---

Generated by Claude Code