skills(pm-dispatch): charter revision — rulings A/③/C, governed-surface tiering, ui/triage lane lines (#17942 chain) - #18018
Merged
Conversation
…iage is the sole producer of grading, routing and dedupe Charter revision, chain head card 17942 (rules layer). Three rulings land here, quoted verbatim: - Q1 and Q2 (director seat, decision batch 131 item 1, 2026-09-13): 「同意」 to `1A(+三类表)·2(1)·3A·4B` — the claiming seat owns a card to MERGED; a cross-lane surface found after dispatch imports an isolated contract-review-tier review whose record carries `Implemented-by:` / `Reviewed-by:`; `pm:retriage` re-routing is pre-dispatch only; the spec seat keeps the intake of NEW `packages/spec` work; derived work in three classes (in-scope ⇒ sub-issue owned by the claiming seat at inherited priority; unclaimed blocker ⇒ the blocked seat claims and does it, any size; in-flight blocker ⇒ wait, `pm:blocking` ranks it first; incidental ⇒ a separate card). - The seat's plan, accepted verbatim: 「以上接受你的建议。」 - Ruling ③ (skills seat record, 2026-09-13T09:51Z): 「同意」 to the five points — 「一律经过分诊。定级、路由、查重、跨仓 shadow 检查、`duplicate_of` 关单,全部收回分诊席一个人做」; 「唯一例外:在飞卡的衍生子卡」; 「立卡者不查重,只在卡面附 3–5 个查重词」; 「查重缓存住在分诊席自己的容器里」. Q3 (self-routing / self-grading) is WITHDRAWN; no self-routing text had reached SKILL.md (git grep -E '自路由|自定级|self-rout' over origin/main exits 1, control 「分诊座位唯一」 hits), so nothing comes out. SKILL.md (812 → 811 in this commit; the family PR nets 0): - 多仓协调: 「跨座位转移 … 唯一豁免:简单阻塞项直接接手」 becomes 认领即跟到 MERGED plus the imported-review record line (+1); 「凡触 packages/spec 一律转」 narrows to NEW spec work; 「跨仓查重/shadow 检查恒归中央」 is deleted — the rule survives in the rewritten 分诊座位唯一生产 line (查重 / shadow / duplicate_of named) and in core-rules 多仓协调; the 单车道仓 repo:* 席 restatement is deleted — it survives at the 单车道仓 … 自理机械三务 line of the same section and the skills-lane finding self-triage line of 分诊座位职责. - 域车道: domain:* production gains the one ruled exception; the third boundary-crossing channel is named. - Epic 子树车道: 衍生问题三分 is deleted — generalised to every dispatched card in 执行座位职责, where the four 简单阻塞项 lines are rewritten as the three-class rule and the blocker rules (the S-level cap is lifted by the ruling; the incidental class survives at 顺带发现 ⇒ 独立立单). - 分诊座位职责: the triage-side dedupe cache line (+1) — lanes/triage.md is at 7/7 with its one spendable line taken by ruling B, so the cache rule lands in the rules layer the triage seat reads. - 平台读数纪律 and 报告契约: 立单前查重 → 立卡者附查重词; 立卡查重先行 → 立卡附查重词. core-rules.md (151/151): mirrors of every moved rule — dedupe keywords, triage as the sole producer including 查重, follow-through plus new-spec intake, the blocker rule, the domain-label exception. Not in this commit (references layer, follow-up PR): contract-review.md 复核归属与资格 / 独立性件 and dispatch-runbook.md 跨车道简单阻塞项直接接手. The 「分诊不重指派」 wording that option B named does not exist in the instruction tree (git grep exits 1), so there is nothing to narrow. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8 Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
…s hand-merged, pm-dispatch references land after in-seat contract-tier review Ruling on card 17950 (live chat with the skills seat, 2026-09-13T07:2xZ–07:4xZ), maintainer verbatim: 「收窄受管面,但是 skills 是不是还是应该我来确认?」, then to the seat's boundary — 「**规则层(你确认)**:所有 SKILL.md 级的规则文本——发布的 `skills/**`(两个仓)、`.claude/skills/*/SKILL.md`(含 pm-dispatch 本体和内部 playbook)、`core-rules.md`、`.claude/agents/**`、hooks、settings、`AGENTS.md`、`CLAUDE.md`、ADR。**事实层(席内契约复审档复核后入队)**:只有 `.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/**`」 — 「我点头」. SKILL.md 〈复核〉 (net 0): the three skills-lane self-landing lines (diff 含 .md ⇒ 四件套 / 纯代码面 including `.claude/` hooks, workflows and settings ⇒ skills 席自审 / 直接落地 ⛔ 不推维护者) are replaced by three lines — the non-governed pure-code path (`scripts/pm/`) keeps its in-seat contract-tier self-review and landing; the two-layer definition; the per-layer landing. The old carve-out that let `.claude/` hooks, workflows and settings PRs land on the skills seat's own review is superseded: the ruling names hooks and settings in the rules layer. The ACCEPT fork line now reads 命中规则层. core-rules.md 执行座位职责: the mirror. lanes/skills.md (33/33): 受管面 PR 恒 draft 等人合 → 规则层受管 PR 恒 draft 等维护者的字; the 范围 pointer names the two layers. The objectui half (published skills/** governed there too) is already stated by lanes/ui.md 常设承诺 and the 跨仓同判 line of 〈复核〉 — measured, no line owed. AGENTS.md Prime Directive 14 (1075 → 1072 in this commit; the PR nets 0): the tiering sentence, paid inside the directive by folding the four ⛔-never spellings into one clause, dropping the node -e helper (the register sentence already names the file), and compressing the armed-or-queued paragraph and the detection sentence without removing a rule. The prose gate's anchor sentence and all five register spans are unchanged; the references prefix is spelled with a trailing slash, never as a ** glob, because check-governed-prose reds any **-shaped span outside the register. Not in this commit: the register and queue-guard script items of the card (a separate script PR) and contract-review.md 落地前检③ (references PR). Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8 Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
…eat lands a governed PR — later pushes included Ruling C on card 17971 (maintainer, live chat with the skills seat, 2026-09-13T08:50Z), verbatim: 「C. approve 后不管后续改动都由席位落地:」 — chosen over A (byte-pinned approval) and B (status quo) with the seat's own reservation in front of the maintainer. AGENTS.md Prime Directive 14: the first sentence gains its converse (confirmed by an authorized approval and then landed by the owning seat; before that approval the four acts stay forbidden); the approval sentence now says WHO lands it — the owning seat, later pushes included, re-queuing after an ejection or a rebase on its own pre-landing check — and that the maintainer's word is spent once per PR. Multi-agent discipline §7 (a): 「never enter this path, however green」 → 「on green alone」. Post-Task Checklist step 2: landing waits for the maintainer's word instead of 「by hand」 alone. Line counts unchanged at each spot. SKILL.md: red line 27 gains 「批准在案后席位落地」, paid on the same line by folding the three 永不 into one; 复核 ②: 授权批准 ⇒ 席位落地; the 批准后再推亦不过期 line now defines 席位落地 = 过落地前检、清标、ready、auto-merge, 踢出/变基同法 (its former 无批准 ⛔ 不翻 ready… half survives at red line 27). core-rules.md 红线: the mirror. Unchanged by design: the queue guards (their predicate already accepts the approval on any commit), objectui's AGENTS.md §9 (sibling repo, its own PR), and each seat's Routine text (updated at its next re-arm, per the card). Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8 Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
…e ui lane instead of pointing at it Card 17933 (p2 Task, routed into this lane by the maintainer's direct word). The maintainer read the pointer as 「不是说你的 ui 车道不需要契约复审了吗?为什么还有 `needs:contract-review`」 — a misreading that had already happened on the rule's own user. lanes/ui.md 席内判断, one line replaced (38/38): the pointer 「档位与复核豁免边界读源码与 references/contract-review.md,⛔ 不凭记忆或继承的注记」 becomes the statement synthesised from contract-review.md's three paragraphs — clause ② review applies to this lane as default-tier self-review plus gates with the label hung as usual; only the independence piece and the downgrade fuse are exempt. The per-lane applicability table and the ruling on the 「复核正为补偿低档派发而存在」 derivation live in contract-review.md and ride the references PR. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8 Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
…graded card in pm:queue with a domain:* Card 17742, graded by the lane's self-triage (2026-09-12T02:20Z), verbatim: 「admitted as class (a) with one measured instance … Grade: pm:queue · Task · priority:p2 … (1) COUNT the population on both boards first … (2) then the cheapest of the card's three shapes that the count supports — a fourth disjunct if the population is small, the H-row home if it is large; (3) the round report's 裸卡 metric must say what it becomes」. Count, posted on the card before this edit (2026-09-13T11:46Z, repo-scoped REST lists, both boards, every page read): pm:queue ∧ domain:* ∧ ¬priority:* = 7 on objectstack and 31 on objectui — small, so the fourth disjunct is the shape; the pm:on-hold pool (69 / 46) is a decision already made and not a dispatch slot, so it stays outside the disjunct and is recorded as a measurement only. SKILL.md 分诊座位职责 (net 0): 析取 ④ takes the line of 「②③ 只取 updated_at …」 and carries that clause for ②③④; the 半状态治愈积压 line reads ②③④; the 轮次报告 裸卡数 metric line states 未定级数另计析取④. core-rules.md 分诊座位职责: the sweep mirror names 队列卡缺定级. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8 Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
…waiting the maintainer's word as one decision batch Card 17951 (p2 Task; the reading-cost half of the maintainer's question, verbatim: 「③ 受管面手合本身也是一条队列。能否简化我的审核步骤,比如我召唤项目总监时可以批量决定?」). SKILL.md 升级与决策 (+1; the family PR nets 0): after the director's four duties, one line — every summon presents the governed drafts carrying an in-seat ACCEPT as one batch of at most five rows; the approval and the merge stay the maintainer's own clicks. AGENTS.md Prime Directive 14: the same duty as one clause of the tiering sentence (the directive is 34 lines before and after the family; 1072 → 1075 across its commits). Not in this commit: lanes/director.md and decision-analysis.md (references PR). Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8 Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
… concurrently belongs to the seat that wrote it Ruling B on card 17624 (director seat, decision batch 125 item 5, 2026-09-13): 「同意」 — the concurrency principle replaces line 7 of lanes/triage.md, a near-verbatim duplicate of the SKILL.md 分诊座位职责 line; the ratchet cap stays at 7. Precondition (ruling item 2) measured word by word: line 7 differs from the SKILL.md line only by 「分诊」 inserted (the subject the SKILL.md section already supplies) and 「裁定」 dropped (SKILL.md is the stricter spelling); neither difference carries a rule absent from SKILL.md, so B stands. lanes/triage.md line 7 (7/7): the restatement is replaced by 「补半状态前先确认无人在动;读取之后才出现的六态属他席,停手重读,⛔ 不替换」. The other three disciplines stay closed by measurement (no shared six-state writer under scripts/pm/), per the ruling's item 3. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8 Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ough ruling — planned spec sub-issues still route to the spec seat, derived work stays with the claiming seat Follow-up on card 17942 (same ruling as the first commit: 「同意」 to `1A(+三类表)·2(1)·3A·4B`, and 「以上接受你的建议。」 — the spec seat keeps the intake of NEW packages/spec work; a cross-lane surface found after dispatch, packages/spec included, does not move the card). Two 座位贴协议 / Epic 子树车道 lines still said 「packages/spec 恒归 spec 座位」 and 「(sub-issue 或衍生)⇒ 照旧转 spec 座位队列」, which would have re-created the transfer the ruling removed for derived work. Both are rewritten in place (net 0): planned spec sub-issues still route to the spec seat with the epic side writing Blocked-by:; derived work follows the three-class rule of 执行座位职责. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8 Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
github-actions
Bot
added
size/m
documentation
claude
Bot
added
the
skip-changeset
This was referenced Sep 13, 2026
Contributor
Author
Contract reviewHead: ① derived judgments — every changed rule read against its ruling, whole diff read line by line:
Density payments, each checked to survive elsewhere: 跨仓查重/shadow line (→ :220 + Seat measurements on the head tree ( ② semver: nothing publishes; ③ boundary flags: Implemented-by: Verdict: PASS — the rules layer of all eight rulings, each verbatim, each paid inside its file; one declared-not-enforced gap named and carded (the queue guard's tier). Governed rules layer: draft stays; Generated by Claude Code |
Contributor
Author
维护者速读(终稿)改了什么 —— 一个 PR 把今天裁过的八张卡的「规则层」文字落进章程: 为什么 —— 这些裁决今天上午已生效,章程文本落后一上午;每个席位读的是文本。 风险与代价 —— 纯文本,回滚 = revert。两点要你知道:(a) 分层现在只是「写了」,合并队列守卫( 未含 —— 批准即由本席按裁决 C 落地(四个 check 还在跑,绿了才落)。要不要批? Generated by Claude Code |
This was referenced Sep 13, 2026
os-zhuang
approved these changes
Sep 13, 2026
os-zhuang
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 13, 2026 13:13
os-zhuang
enabled auto-merge
September 13, 2026 13:14
Contributor
Author
|
Ruling C landing step — skills seat (session Generated by Claude Code |
This was referenced Sep 13, 2026
os-project-manager
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 13, 2026
…es tier The maintainer tiered the governed surface on 2026-09-13 and the charter text landed with PR #18018, but the queue guard still demanded an authorized approval for every governed path — so the tier was declared and not enforced. The merge-group leg now classifies each governed pull request's governed paths and, when they ALL lie under `.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/`, accepts the skills seat's review of record on the CURRENT head in place of the approval: a `## Contract review` comment on the PR thread carrying a `Reviewed-by:` line and a `Served-tier:` reading that stands. Every other governed path is the rules layer and keeps today's predicate byte-for-byte — 16 predicate bodies are md5-identical to their pre-change selves. Recognition is IMPORTED, never re-implemented: the heading marker, the head-sha span test, the newest-of resolution, the `Reviewed-by:` key line and the `Served-tier:` reader all come from the two files that own them. Reaching them needed the module-eval cycle solved rather than worked around, so the import is lazy and this file's dispatch no longer carries a top-level await; the battery pins that precondition against this file's own source. The leg is MONOTONE by construction — consulted only for an entry no authorized approval satisfied — so it can lift a refusal and can never create one. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8 Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Sep 13, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #17971
Fixes #17742
Fixes #17624
Part of #17942
Part of #17950
Part of #17933
Part of #17934
Part of #17951
Dev session
session_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8on branchclaude/issue-17942-charter-revision(worktreeobjectstack-issue-17942). Rules-layer charter revision for the eight-card family whose chain head is #17942. Deferred to the follow-up references PR (files occupied by PR #17990 / #17992, seat-landable once this PR lands the tiering):contract-review.md(the #17934 落地前检③ exception, #17933's per-lane table, #17950's 落地前检③ line, #17942's 复核归属 / 独立性件),dispatch-runbook.md(#17942's 跨车道直接接手),lanes/director.md+decision-analysis.md(#17951's director half); the #17950 register / queue-guard script items are their own script PR. #17934 has no edit here — its ruling lives in a deferred file.Rulings landed (verbatim, one commit per card)
1A(+三类表)·2(1)·3A·4B; 5652079343 「以上接受你的建议。」; 5652544529 ruling ③ 「同意」 (「一律经过分诊 … 唯一例外:在飞卡的衍生子卡 … 立卡者不查重,只在卡面附 3–5 个查重词 … 查重缓存住在分诊席自己的容器里」). Q3 withdrawn — no self-routing text had reached SKILL.md (git grep -E '自路由|自定级|self-rout' origin/main -- .claude/skills/pm-dispatchexits 1; control 「分诊座位唯一」 hits), so nothing came out. The 「分诊不重指派」 wording does not exist in the tree (git grep exits 1) — nothing to narrow..claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/**lands through the queue after in-seat contract-tier review (maintainer ruling 2026-09-13) #17950 — 「我点头」 to the boundary 「规则层(你确认)… 事实层(席内契约复审档复核后入队):只有.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/**」.lanes/ui.md指向条款②的适用面却不陈述它 —— 维护者据此读成「本车道无需契约复核」 #17933 — the maintainer's misreading 「不是说你的 ui 车道不需要契约复审了吗?为什么还有needs:contract-review」;lanes/ui.md:38 now states the applicability.pm:queuewith adomain:*matches none of the three disjunctions — invisible to triage, visible to the lane's candidate query #17742 — self-triage 5642823259 (fourth disjunct if the population is small); count posted on the card first (5653074219):pm:queue∧domain:*∧ ¬priority:*= 7 objectstack / 31 objectui at 2026-09-13T11:46Z.lanes/triage.md:7 differed from the SKILL.md line only by 「分诊」 inserted and 「裁定」 dropped — no rule lost.Acceptance greps (
git grep -c -FatBASE→ this head; every file's control still hits)Landing is tiered/ 「两层分档」GOVERNED_SURFACES/ 「QA 波次由维护者手动触发」landed by the owning seatdirector seat requests as ONEA version release is performed by the maintainerLine budgets (net 0 per file, paid by density inside the file — payments named in each commit)
SKILL.md 812 → 812 (widest table row 342 B, untouched); core-rules.md 151 → 151; AGENTS.md 1075 → 1075 (widest row 768 B, untouched; the
node -ehelper line under PD #14 is the one deletion that is not a rule); lanes/ui.md 38 → 38; lanes/triage.md 7 → 7; lanes/skills.md 33 → 33. Every added line ≤ 120 B (git diff BASE..HEAD | grep '^+' | awk 'length>120'prints nothing); the whole-fileawk 'length($0)>120'baseline is 23 / 23 on SKILL.md and 15 → 14 on AGENTS.md — all table rows or the dropped helper line, the shape the ratchet exempts (the PM's "empty over edited files" expectation is false onorigin/mainalready). Decision frame block byte-identical: md53327d02c56f8a0eca88569dad2270f32(now at :733–:754).Deviations from the dispatch, stated
references/**spelling in prose:check:pm-governed-prosereds any**-shaped code span outside the register, so the tier is spelled.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/(AGENTS.md) and 本技能references/(SKILL.md)..claude/hooks/workflows/settings PRs self-land on the skills seat's review; the pm-dispatch: tier the governed surface — the rules layer stays hand-merged,.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/**lands through the queue after in-seat contract-tier review (maintainer ruling 2026-09-13) #17950 ruling names hooks and settings in the rules layer, so those three lines became the tiering lines (provenance beyond the shallow window not read).Gates (derived with
node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstackon the merged head269933d9; all 18 run in the foreground, exit codes captured before any pipe,--ranreconciled: 18 derived, 18 run, 0 unrun)check:pm-skill-ratchet✓ (SKILL.md 812/812 · core-rules 151/151 · AGENTS.md 1075/1075 · ui 38/38 · triage 7/7 · skills 33/33; both widest-row pins at headroom 0) ·check:pm-skill-id-lint✓ 27 files clean ·check:skill-frame-sync✓ ·check:pm-governed-prose✓ (5 register surfaces named, no over-claim) ·check:pm-governed-merges✓ ·check:nul-bytes✓ 8593 files ·check:refd-timer-probe✓ ·check:doc-authoring✓ ·check:required-contexts✓ ·check:watch-hint-literal✓ ·check:agent-test-spelling✓ ·check:docs-audit-scope✓ ·check:driver-memory-census✓ ·check-closing-keyword-parity(+ self-test) ✓ ·check-comment-mask-corpus✓ ·check-governed-queue-guard --self-test✓ 183 cases ·@objectstack/lint check:doc-formula-expressions✓ (first run exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET — formula/lint unbuilt; built under the verify lock, 2m52s, then ✓). No package is touched ⇒ no build/test closure owed; changeset:.claude/**andAGENTS.mdpublish nothing ⇒skip-changeset.Acceptance notes (noted, not filed; 承接者 named)
.claude/agents/os-dev.md:50 「先搜再立」 still asks the dev to dedupe before filing; ruling ③ moves dedupe to triage (filer attaches keywords). 承接者: the skills seat — a class-1 sub-issue of [Decision] A claimed card follows through to MERGED; cross-lane surfaces import the review instead of exporting the card; in-scope derived work and unclaimed blockers stay with the claiming seat (maintainer question after #17718, 2026-09-13) #17942 (os-dev.md has its own ceiling; not in this PR's file surface).lanes/ui.md:25 and objectuiAGENTS.md§9 still read 「停在 draft 等人合」 — ruling C applies to objectui governed PRs too (the card names objectui#9374 / [finding] delegation-of-duty.dogfood.test.ts is a real end-to-end proof of the ADR-0091 validity window, and no authz matrix row cites it #9377). 承接者: the skills seat, sibling-repo PR.SKILL.md:113pm:retriagerow and :106 assignee row (table rows) still name 改路由 / 跨车道移交 without the pre-dispatch qualifier; the bullet 「pm:retriage改路由只对未派发卡」 governs. 承接者: whoever next edits those rows under the 342 B pin.维护者速读(草稿)
改了什么:把这周你在聊天里定下的八条裁决写进 PM 章程的规则层——认领的卡跟到合并(碰到 spec 面借复核不换席)、衍生子卡与阻塞项的三分表、定级/路由/查重收回分诊席(立卡者只附查重词)、受管面分两层(只有 pm-dispatch 的 references 目录经席内复核后入队,其余仍由你确认)、你批准之后由席位自己落地(后续推送也是)、ui 车道条款②适用面写明、分诊 sweep 补第四态、总监席把待你确认的受管草稿一批呈报、分诊席「并发出现的六态属他席」。SKILL.md、核心条款、AGENTS.md 第 14 条、三个车道文件,行数全部不变,每处新增都在同文件删重付账。
为什么改:每条都是已裁未落地的章程滞后;裁决原文逐字引在各 commit 与上文。
风险与代价(含回滚):不发布任何包、无 changeset;规则层文本改动,回滚 = revert 本 PR。风险在两处判断:AGENTS.md 第 14 条为付行数删掉了
node -e打印受管面的辅助命令(注册表所在文件仍点名);〈复核〉里「.claude/hooks/settings 纯代码面由 skills 席自审直接落地」的旧例外被你 09-13 的分层裁决覆盖,已删。未含:references 层的对应条文(contract-review.md 的落地前检③例外与逐车道适用表、dispatch-runbook.md 的接手细则、director.md 与 decision-analysis.md 的总监批呈)另起一个 references PR,待 PR #17990 / #17992 落地后由席位自落;#17950 的注册表与队列守卫脚本项另起脚本 PR。
一句问:同意「hooks/settings 的旧自审直落例外」随分层裁决一并删除吗(是/否)?
Generated by Claude Code