docs(pm,agents): three rules-layer lines catch up with the charter rulings

[os-project-manager]

Fixes #18019

Three governed lines outside the charter rules-layer PR's declared file surface still carried pre-ruling text after 9489e2c0 (rules layer) and c185d087 (references) landed. Each now states the rule that governs it — one commit per file, each quoting its ruling verbatim and untranslated.

file	was	now	budget
.claude/agents/os-dev.md :50	先搜再立 — the filer scans open issues before filing	立卡者不查重, 3–5 keywords on the card, never a board pull	403/403 lines, 115 B (cap 120)
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md :106	跨车道移交 listed as a fourth release cause	three causes, 改路由 qualified 限未派发, 在飞卡跟到 MERGED	812/812 lines, row 235 B
same file :113	跨域 PR 指定车道、改路由, unqualified	定车道与改路由限未派发卡	row 269 B; widest row unchanged at 342 B (L244)
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/ui.md :25	draft until a human merges, 不留批准	draft until an authorized approval, then the owning seat lands it; the seat never approves	38/38 lines, 118 B (cap 120)

check:pm-skill-ratchet green with every touched ceiling still at headroom 0 and no ceiling moved; SKILL.md frame block L733-754 md5 3327d02c56f8a0eca88569dad2270f32 byte-unchanged.

Executable criterion — measured origin/main 226970b to HEAD

git grep -c per file: 先搜再立 in os-dev.md 1 to 0 · 跨车道移交 in SKILL.md 1 to 0 · 停在 draft 等人合 in lanes/ui.md 1 to 0. Lit controls on neighbouring surviving phrases, same greps, same two refs: noted, not filed 3 to 3 · 离手恒走释放 1 to 1 · 异议评论写明所求 1 to 1 · 未命中的 PR 按同节走合并队列落地 1 to 1.

Gates

node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack at HEAD ac73575c derived 18 families; all 18 ran in the foreground with the exit code captured before any pipe, all exit 0; --ran reconciles 18 derived / 18 run / 0 NOT-MEASURED / 0 UNRUN. check:doc-formula-expressions first answered exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET (unbuilt workspace package, nothing measured) and was re-run to exit 0 after turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint.

Repo-wide pnpm lint is not owed here and can produce no verdict on this diff: eslint's own config supplies no configuration for .md, and --format json over the three files reports 3 files, 0 errors, 3 warnings, each of them File ignored because no matching configuration was supplied. skip-changeset applies — .claude/ publishes nothing from any released package.

Premise checks

P1, P2 and P3 confirmed on origin/main 226970b. P4 confirmed: all 12 open PRs were fetched into a private ref namespace and diffed against their own merge-base — none touches these files. P5 measured NO: references/core-rules.md mirrors none of the three pre-ruling lines; it already carries the post-ruling statements at :8, :51 and :123, so it is not in this diff.

Acceptance notes

Noted, not filed: os-dev.md :53, :54 and :58 still describe the dedupe channel the filer no longer uses (the search_issues fallback on 403, the control-word rule, 那一次查重). Same residue class as :50, but outside this card's declared one-line surface and the file's 403/403 ceiling. Carrier: the seat that owns the charter-revision family.

维护者速读(草稿)

改了什么 — 三个文件各改一处(SKILL.md 是两行表格行),把还写着旧规矩的句子换成已经落地的规矩:立卡人只在卡面附查重词、不再自己查重;在飞的卡不跨车道移交,改路由只对未派发的卡;受管面 PR 停在 draft 等的是「授权批准」,批准到手后由认领席自己 ready 加入队落地,席位仍然永不批准。

为什么改 — 这三行落在章程改版 PR 的文件面之外,规则合入后它们就和已生效的规则直接打架。留着,下一个读到的人会照旧规矩办事。

风险与代价(含回滚) — 纯指令文本,没有运行时影响。三个文件都卡在行数上限,改动是等行替换,净增 0 行,棘轮一个都没抬。回滚就是 revert 这三个 commit,彼此独立、互不依赖。

席位意见 —

你要做的 — 受管面,PR 留 draft 等你。请确认第三条的措辞:拿到授权批准后由认领席自己落地,是不是你要的形态?

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

• Served-tier: 1198/1198 claude-fable-5-1 — harness model stamp counted over this seat's own transcript (non-sidechain assistant messages a model served; <synthetic> harness notices excluded) at 2026-09-13T15:54Z; get_session external_metadata.last_served_model read claude-fable-5-1 at 2026-09-13T15:54Z.

Contract review

Head: ac73575c (PR #18051, card #18019) — read at 2026-09-13T15:55Z by the skills seat at the contract-review tier. GOVERNED rules layer, measured: .claude/agents/os-dev.md :50, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md :106 + :113, .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/ui.md :25 (4 insertions, 4 deletions, three commits each quoting its ruling) ⇒ four-piece: this record + 速读终稿 below, ACCEPT on #18019, needs-user-decision on this PR, reviews requested from os-zhuang and hotlong; ⛔ draft until an authorized approval exists, then ruling C landing by this seat. Execution ran at opus under the tiering ruling's own exit (one-line-class mechanical governed edits), this review at claude-fable-5-1.

① derived judgments — each line now states the rule that already governs it, nothing new is ruled:

1. os-dev.md :50 「立卡者不查重,只在卡面附 3–5 个查重词;查重归分诊席,⛔ 不扫 open issues、不拉板。」 — ruling ③ point 3 verbatim in substance (5652544529); 115 B; the surrounding :53/:54/:58 still describe the old channel (dev's note, same class, outside this surface — carried by this seat).
2. SKILL.md :106 — the assignee row drops 跨车道移交 (an in-flight card follows through: 〈多仓协调〉 :227 认领即跟到 MERGED, contract-review.md 借复核不移卡) and qualifies 改路由 with 限未派发. The dev's open question is answered here: option A. 改路由(限未派发) is the narrowest reading that keeps the row true — the only window it can fire in is a self-claimed, not-yet-dispatched card, which is exactly the window the landed bullet 「pm:retriage 改路由只对未派发卡」 leaves open; B deletes a legitimate act, C leaves the row readable as a licence to re-route an in-flight card, the defect this card was filed about. 235 B.
3. SKILL.md :113 — the pm:retriage row gains 「定车道与改路由限未派发卡」, agreeing with :106 and the bullet; 269 B. The widest row stays L244 at the 342 B pin.
4. lanes/ui.md :25 「命中即停 draft;⛔ 未获授权批准不 ready 不入队不自合、永不批准,获批后认领席落地。」 — ruling C (5652306063) in one line; 118 B. ⛔ never approve is kept.
5. Budgets: every touched file at its ceiling before and after — os-dev.md 403/403, SKILL.md 812/812 (widest row 342/342), lanes/ui.md 38/38 — equal-line replacements, no payment owed; frame block :733–:754 md5 3327d02c56f8a0eca88569dad2270f32 byte-unchanged (seat-measured on the head export). core-rules.md mirrors none of the three lines and already carries the post-ruling statements (:8, :51, :123) — the 〈优先级〉 same-PR rule is not engaged.
6. Deviations, declared, accepted: the 速读 in the five-section shape os-dev.md fixes (a superset of the dispatch's four); the labels POST retried with Content-Type after a 415; MCP was used for the PR creation (so the PR is authored by os-project-manager, the linked user — a channel fact this seat measured only after the dispatch; the record and the card stay App-owned).

Seat measurements on the head tree (git archive ac73575c): check-skill-line-ratchet per-file rows all ✓ at headroom 0 (the run's one ✗ is my export lacking CLAUDE.md, not the PR); frame md5 equal. Executable criterion re-read on the diff: 先搜再立 1→0, 跨车道移交 1→0, 停在 draft 等人合 1→0, with the dev's four lit controls unchanged. Checks on ac73575c at 2026-09-13T15:54Z: 29 runs, 0 red, 2 running (Lint & Repo Gates, Type Check · consumer gates) — the landing check ③ reads them green before ruling C fires.

② semver: .claude/** publishes nothing; skip-changeset is right.

③ boundary flags: open_questions — one, answered above (A). Two 「noted, not filed」 items stand: os-dev.md :53/:54/:58 (this seat's family, next density pass) and lanes/ui.md :24 → objectui AGENTS.md §9 (the objectui card in this seat's filing batch).

Implemented-by: claude/issue-18019-charter-residue-three-lines
Reviewed-by: session_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8

Verdict: PASS — three residue lines now say what PR #18018 and PR #18038 already rule, net zero everywhere; awaiting an authorized approval.

维护者速读(终稿)

改了什么:三个文件各改一行(SKILL.md 是两行表格行),把还写着旧规矩的句子换成已经生效的规矩:立卡人只在卡面附 3–5 个查重词、不再自己扫板查重;在飞的卡不跨车道移交,改路由只对未派发的卡;受管面 PR 停 draft 等的是「授权批准」,批准到手后由认领席自己 ready 加入队落地,席位永不批准。
为什么改:这三行落在章程改版两张 PR 的文件面之外,规则合入后它们和已生效的规则直接打架。
风险与代价(含回滚):纯指令文本,无运行时影响;三个文件都在行数上限,等行替换,净增 0 行,棘轮一个没动;回滚 = revert 三个 commit,彼此独立。
席位意见:通过。dev 问的一个字眼(assignee 行保不保留「改路由(限未派发)」)我按 A 定了:保留并限定未派发,是让这一行仍为真的最窄写法。
你要做的:一次批准(os-zhuang 或 hotlong)。批准后我按裁决 C 落地,不再找你。
一句问:同意「改路由(限未派发)」留在 assignee 行吗(是/否)?

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

Ruling C landing step — skills seat (session session_01DAcomhvR9kKizeYgg89Vo8), 2026-09-13T22:41Z. Authorized approval read: os-zhuang APPROVED on head ac73575c (review 5192546519, submitted 2026-09-13T22:39Z; not dismissed), who also flipped the PR ready and armed auto-merge. Seat readings at 2026-09-13T22:41Z: ① the contract review of record 5654347747 names this head ac73575c (unchanged since); ② check-clause2-carriers --pair 18051 exit 0; ③ 35 checks on ac73575c, 0 red, 0 running; ④ needs-user-decision cleared in this pass and read back. The seat re-reads and re-arms only if the queue ejects it. Landing record follows on #18019 once origin/main carries (#18051); PR #18072 (locks 1–4) still awaits its own approval and merges origin/main after this lands (shared SKILL.md / os-dev.md on different lines).

---

Generated by Claude Code