Repository navigation
Conversation
|
PR #580 field GUI corrections now have a green descendant build: draft PR #581 at Field acceptance still needs physical BCUGE/ZIV: the SCL fallback only proves SG declarations (not live active settings); CF magnitude units need exact verified data; vector magnitude/angle cannot display as paired when timestamp/source authority mismatches. No engine pin or main/stable change. This is the proper candidate for next screenshot comparison, not red #580 SHA. |
|
D27 retired redundant historical PR, source is already in integrated RC. GitHub ancestry |
M2.14 field acceptance feedback — operator UI + honest IEC evidence
Base: verified #579
07b7b182(10/10 CI), stacked above #577 (DO hierarchy), #575 (icons/first-run), #573 (A SSOT stress) and B #570 (scalar/vector guard). No parent branch, engine pin, static Report, MMS writes or public stable changes.Field feedback and targeted correction
∠is reserved for actual compatible Report/Read samples; never print false pairs or fake missing values.°for exactcVal/instCVal.ang.finMXwhen no conflicting or overriding explicit unit exists. Never infer angle forHz,TotWor unrelatedang.f; unit CF for magnitude still requires model/read evidence.Still open
Real
CF.unitsmagnitude metadata and read access are relay-dependent; unsupported reads remainNot read. The screenshot BCUGE still requires physical validation of value/angle provenance and SG entries. This PR does not claim full reference GUI parity. Exact-SHA Windows CI plus physical BCUGE/ZIV acceptance are required before review/promotion.