Repository navigation
docs: add before/after optimization case study with FEM curves - #17
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds a case study to the optimization guide: the 22/40 reference pair is optimized for contact stress with ISO and with AGMA, rated by both standards, and checked with the 2D FEM model at the same nominal force.
docs/figures/optimization_case_study.py(stages: ratings, fem, figures, animation) with tests.docs/optimization.mdwith the comparison table, FEM curves along the full path of contact, composite stress maps and an animation.The joint contact-and-root objective is tracked separately in #15 and a common calculation interface in #16.
Checks run locally: strict Sphinx build,
ruff check .,ruff format --check src tests,pytest(318 passed, 1 skipped without CalculiX).