Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions sdks/csharp/.meta-check-ignore
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
release~
11 changes: 0 additions & 11 deletions sdks/csharp/packages/.gitignore

This file was deleted.

Binary file not shown.
Binary file not shown.
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions sdks/csharp/release~/.gitignore
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
# Ignore DLLs - these will be populated by dotnet restore
*.dll

# Ignore XML documentation
*.xml
File renamed without changes.
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
.nupkg.metadata
.signature.p7s
LICENSE
README.md
logo.png
spacetimedb.bsatn.runtime.*.nupkg*
spacetimedb.bsatn.runtime.nuspec
*.xml
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as an aside.. to we expect any of these files to actually appear down here?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This .gitignore file gets included when we copy unversioned to a versioned directory (e.g. 1.10.0). Then the release step of actually copying the DLL files is a bit easier because we just copy the output of the dotnet pack into this directory and when we git add && git commit we don't have to worry about accidentally committing these files. I could update the release flow to only git commit the required files instead of doing a git commit on the directory - what do you prefer?

Loading