test(expo): publish for a session that started on a commit of the base branch

[mikepitre]

Description

This is the same change as clerk/clerk-ios#691, for the Expo package in integration/expo-native/. clerk/clerk-android#1089 is the same change for clerk-android. This PR sits on #10219.

A cloud agent ran the verify skill from start to finish on clerk/clerk-ios#690, a trial that is closed now. It pushed its branch at main, started a borrowed-device session, made the before run, pushed the change, opened the pull request, and made the after run in the same session. Then attach refused to hand the evidence off. The publish workflow took a session only when the commit it started on was a commit of the pull request, and this session had started on the commit the branch came from, which is a commit of main. The agent had to end the session and start a second one on the pushed change. That cost 13 more minutes, and the pull request was open without its evidence for 20 minutes.

After this PR:

• scripts/verify-attach.mjs takes a session when the commit it started on is a commit of the pull request, or a commit that the base branch of the pull request holds. For the second case it asks GitHub to compare the start commit with base.sha of the pull request, and it takes only ahead or identical as a yes. Any other answer, an answer that is not JSON, and a base that is not a commit id all count as a no. When GitHub does not find the start commit in the repository, the job prints a notice that says so and publishes nothing. When gh cannot make the comparison for another reason, the job fails. The commit of the run must still be a commit of the pull request, and no other check changes.
• attach checks the same rule before it hands off, in pullRequestMismatch in integration/expo-native/src/core/remote/handoff.ts. The workflow checks the script out alone, so the two cannot share code. Each side states the rule once, and their tests cover the same cases. When GitHub does not find the start commit, attach fails with that reason and says to start a session on a commit of the pull request or of its base branch.
• One session does the before run and the run of the change, for every change. SKILL.md gives one order of work for a local device and a remote session: branch, push, up, before run, change, commit, push, after run, open the pull request, attach, down. The two-session recipe is gone, and so is the sentence that said to open the pull request before up. The pull request is opened after the last run so that it is not left open without its evidence. On a remote session the evidence reaches the description about a minute after down.
• publish --dry-run can read the comparison from a file with --compare <file>, next to --pull and --commits. The workflow passes none of them. --compare with no file after it prints the usage and exits with 2.

The script, backend.ts, handoff.ts and test/handoff.test.ts are byte copies of the files of clerk/clerk-ios#691. scripts/verify-attach.test.mjs differs from the file there in one line, which imports describe and it from vitest. The changeset is empty, as it is in the other PRs of the stack. No published package changes.

Why the new rule is safe. The publish job runs no code from a session. It reads the artifact, checks it against its own limits, and writes what the session reported under the name of the account that started it. The start commit decides only which verify-remote.yml and which session agent ran on the runner. A session that started on a commit of the base branch ran the ones the base branch already has. A session that started on a commit of the pull request ran whatever that commit holds, and the old rule took those. So the new case trusts no code that the old rule did not. The start commit comes from the run that GitHub records, the base from the pull request that GitHub returns, and the answer from GitHub, so nothing more is taken from the session.

Apart from this case, the old rule refused a session whose start commit the history of the pull request no longer has, such as one that started before the branch was rewritten. That session is still refused, because its commit is on neither side. In a stack like this one, the base branch of a pull request is the branch below it, so a session may start on a commit of that branch.

npm test in integration/expo-native/ passes 793 of 793, where #10219 has 787, and npm run typecheck is clean. vitest run --root scripts verify-attach passes 196 of 196, where #10219 has 190. At the first commit of the rule, each of 38 deliberate breaks of the new condition failed at least one test. 20 were in the script and 18 in the CLI. Each of 12 breaks of the fix that followed it, six on each side, fails a test at this head. clerk/clerk-ios#691 has the run of both scripts on the real values of clerk/clerk-ios#690. The script on main there refuses that session, and this one accepts it in a dry run.

Not proven:

• No session was started for this change, so the new path has not run on a runner. The comparison in the workflow is made with the token of the verify-evidence environment. This repository is public and GitHub answers such a comparison to a request with no token, so that token should read it too. It has not run with that token.
• The workflow runs the script that is on main, and this stack is not on main yet.
• That base.sha is always a commit of the base branch is read from four merged pull requests of clerk-ios, not from GitHub's documentation.
• A cold run of the whole order by a cloud agent has not been made.

Checklist

• pnpm test runs as expected.
• pnpm build runs as expected.
• (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
• (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

• 🐛 Bug fix
• 🌟 New feature
• 🔨 Breaking change
• 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
• other: test tooling

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated
clerk-js-sandbox	Ready	Preview	Oct 14, 2026 12:44am UTC
swingset	Ready	Preview	Oct 14, 2026 12:44am UTC

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: e2d4892

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 0 packages

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[coderabbitai]

Important

Draft PR not reviewed

Draft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.

• Trigger a manual review

To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration:

reviews:
  auto_review:
    drafts: true

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[pkg-pr-new]

Open in StackBlitz

@clerk/astro

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/astro@10221

@clerk/backend

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/backend@10221

@clerk/chrome-extension

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/chrome-extension@10221

@clerk/clerk-js

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/clerk-js@10221

@clerk/electron

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/electron@10221

@clerk/electron-passkeys

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/electron-passkeys@10221

@clerk/eslint-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/eslint-plugin@10221

@clerk/expo

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo@10221

@clerk/expo-biometrics

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-biometrics@10221

@clerk/expo-google-signin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-google-signin@10221

@clerk/expo-native-components

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-native-components@10221

@clerk/expo-passkeys

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/expo-passkeys@10221

@clerk/express

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/express@10221

@clerk/fastify

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/fastify@10221

@clerk/hono

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/hono@10221

@clerk/localizations

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/localizations@10221

@clerk/mosaic

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/mosaic@10221

@clerk/nextjs

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/nextjs@10221

@clerk/nuxt

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/nuxt@10221

@clerk/react

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/react@10221

@clerk/react-router

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/react-router@10221

@clerk/shared

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/shared@10221

@clerk/tanstack-react-start

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/tanstack-react-start@10221

@clerk/testing

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/testing@10221

@clerk/ui

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/ui@10221

@clerk/upgrade

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/upgrade@10221

@clerk/vue

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@clerk/vue@10221

commit: e2d4892

[mikepitre]

Replaced by the regrouped stack #10235, #10236, #10237 and #10238, which ends on the same code (tree c2fc7c19). The old stack grew one PR per port from clerk-ios and clerk-android; the new one groups what a reviewer reads together.