Skip to content

Adding new Watcher's Eye variants#935

Open
Wires77 wants to merge 14 commits intoOpenarl:devfrom
Wires77:dev
Open

Adding new Watcher's Eye variants#935
Wires77 wants to merge 14 commits intoOpenarl:devfrom
Wires77:dev

Conversation

@Wires77
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Wires77 Wires77 commented Mar 23, 2018

I copied these from the wiki, and for some reason the diff is showing the addition and removal of almost all of them.

I also added a checkbox to differentiate between a jewel from Uber Elder and one from just regular Elder. I wasn't able to figure out how to hide the checkbox for other uniques without my code removing all of the variant section or leaving a blank, so I just disabled it to get this in. I can remove that commit or at least the checkbox after this weekend if you'd rather wait on that piece until later.

Wires77 added 2 commits March 23, 2018 11:54
…s disabled for other items while I figure out how to hide it and dynamically move the other content around
@chollinger chollinger mentioned this pull request Apr 2, 2018
@temmings
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

temmings commented Apr 3, 2018

When editing a gem other than Watcher's Eye, Uber label and the check box overlap on Corrupt button.

capture

@Wires77
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Wires77 commented Apr 4, 2018

In the latest commit I just removed that box in favor of a "None" variant for the third watcher's eye mod. Thanks for pointing it out though.

@melink14
Copy link
Copy Markdown

is there an idea on when this pull request will be merged?

@solomonhawk
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Openarl I know you're super busy with the Blight release at the moment, but I wanted to put this back on your radar. From my perspective this is a fairly low-risk and high-value change that many users would really appreciate.

Is there more to be done here or does it just need a keen review from a core maintainer? Anything I can do to help?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants