refactor: extract MoneyRequestReportTransactionList presentational components

[sosek108]

Explanation of Change

This is PR 7 of a 10-PR stack decomposing the MoneyRequestReport list components (MoneyRequestReportActionsList / MoneyRequestReportTransactionList) into focused hooks and presentational sub-components (issue #99919, superseding drafts #99307 and #99417).

This slice starts Track B by extracting the transaction list's presentational chrome into dedicated components:

• New: src/components/MoneyRequestReportView/MoneyRequestReportGroupByButton.tsx — the "Group by" dropdown: shows the current grouping and lets the user pick category/tag grouping or the flat matrix layout.
• New: src/components/MoneyRequestReportView/MoneyRequestReportTableHeaderRow.tsx — the transaction table's header row: the select-all checkbox plus the sortable column headers.
• New: src/components/MoneyRequestReportView/MoneyRequestReportListFooter.tsx — everything rendered below the transaction rows: the pending-expense skeleton, the Add Expense button, the spend breakdown, and the report total. The Add Expense dropdown options and their Onyx reads (billing grace periods, draft transactions, amount owed, distance expense type) move with it, so the parent no longer subscribes to them.
• Edit: src/components/MoneyRequestReportView/MoneyRequestReportTransactionList.tsx — consumes the three components in place of the inline JSX blocks and drops the locals/imports that moved with them (group-by popover machinery, select-all header row, Add Expense/breakdown footer). The data/behavior hooks are extracted in the follow-up slices (PR 8–10).

Pure refactor — no behavior change.

Stack note: this PR is stacked on #100035 (decompose/money-request-report-transactions-a5), which is stacked on #100033, #100030, #100025, #100024 and #100023. Until those PRs merge, the diff here also shows their commits. Only the "Extract MoneyRequestReportTransactionList presentational components" commit belongs to this slice.

Fixed Issues

$ #99919
PROPOSAL:

Tests

1. Open an expense report with transactions — verify the transaction table renders as before (columns, sorting, totals)
2. On a wide screen, click a column header — verify the table sorts by that column and the sort direction toggles
3. Click the select-all checkbox in the table header — verify all transactions get selected; click again to clear
4. Open the "Group by" dropdown — pick Category, Tag, and None — verify the grouping and the dropdown label update accordingly
5. As the report submitter on an open report, verify the Add Expense button below the table works and its dropdown options open the right flows
6. On a report with company-card (non-reimbursable) spend, verify the out-of-pocket/company-spend breakdown and the report total render below the table
7. Run npx jest tests/ui/MoneyRequestReportActionsListRejectModalTest.tsx and verify it passes

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

1. Go offline and add an expense to the report — verify the report total and breakdown show with the offline pending style
2. Go offline and delete an expense — verify the select-all checkbox ignores the pending-delete row when selecting all

QA Steps

Same as Tests.

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

• I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
  • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
• If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
  • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
  • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...estReportView/MoneyRequestReportEmptyStateView.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...oneyRequestReportView/useMoneyRequestReportData.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/hooks/useMarkAsRead.ts	95.94% <100.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
src/hooks/useUnreadMarker.ts	94.44% <100.00%> (+0.15%)	⬆️
...equestReportView/MoneyRequestReportActionsList.tsx	92.77% <91.17%> (+32.45%)	⬆️
...tReportView/useMoneyRequestReportVisibleActions.ts	52.63% <52.63%> (ø)
...questReportView/useMoneyRequestReportPagination.ts	69.04% <69.04%> (ø)
...stReportView/MoneyRequestReportTransactionList.tsx	0.36% <0.00%> (+0.07%)	⬆️
...eyRequestReportView/useMoneyRequestReportScroll.ts	64.38% <64.38%> (ø)
...uestReportView/MoneyRequestReportGroupByButton.tsx	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 2 more
... and 33 files with indirect coverage changes