-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
Add old version check to OTA update #5213
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Add a field to the OTA metadata structure indicating the oldest base version it's safe to install this update /from/. This provides a clear path forward in case there are incompatibilities, eg. some case (bootloader compatibility) where 0.16.0 cannot be installed safely from 0.15.2, but a transitional 0.15.3 can arrange the groundwork.
If we cap the acceptable version, it becomes impossible to increase it: older firmwares will reject it. Instead we must guarantee backwards compatibility so long as the magic number is the same. If a breaking change is required in the future, a new magic number should be used to identify it.
Report the older structure version until sufficient penetration of the previous patch.
WalkthroughThis PR increments the metadata descriptor version constant, adds platform-specific bootloader version data to build metadata, introduces a new safe-update version field to the metadata structure, implements OTA version-safety checks, removes a previous version validation check, and updates OTA error messaging text. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Areas requiring extra attention:
Possibly related PRs
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
wled00/wled_metadata.cpp (1)
56-67: Verify the FIXME is tracked for the 0.16 release.The hardcoded
1for backward compatibility is acknowledged in the PR description. Ensure this FIXME is tracked (e.g., via an issue) so it doesn't get forgotten before the 0.16 release when the value should be changed toWLED_CUSTOM_DESC_VERSION.The platform-specific safe update versions (
{0, 15, 3}for ESP32,{0, 15, 2}for others) are clearly documented with their rationale.Would you like me to open an issue to track reverting this change before the 0.16 release?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
wled00/wled_metadata.cpp(3 hunks)wled00/wled_metadata.h(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
wled00/**/!(html_*)*.h
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
Use 2-space indentation for non-generated C++ header files (.h)
Files:
wled00/wled_metadata.h
wled00/**/*.cpp
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)
Use 2-space indentation for C++ source files (.cpp)
Files:
wled00/wled_metadata.cpp
🧠 Learnings (17)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: willmmiles
Repo: wled/WLED PR: 4998
File: wled00/ota_update.cpp:120-124
Timestamp: 2025-10-11T17:56:24.923Z
Learning: In the WLED OTA update implementation (wled00/ota_update.cpp), the parameter name for bypassing OTA validation is "skipValidation", not "ignoreRelease". The intent evolved from the original spec in issue #4929 to disable all validation checks, not just release name checks, which is why the broader parameter name "skipValidation" is used.
Learnt from: softhack007
Repo: wled/WLED PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-14T13:37:11.994Z
Learning: In WLED code reviews, when code is modified or added, look for "magic numbers" (hardcoded numeric literals) and suggest replacing them with appropriate defined constants when those constants are meaningful in the context of the PR. For example, the hardcoded value 32 should be replaced with WLED_MAX_SEGNAME_LEN when it represents a segment name length limit. This improves code maintainability and reduces the risk of inconsistencies.
Learnt from: willmmiles
Repo: wled/WLED PR: 4890
File: lib/NeoESP32RmtHI/include/NeoEsp32RmtHIMethod.h:173-180
Timestamp: 2025-09-02T01:56:43.841Z
Learning: willmmiles prefers to maintain consistency with upstream NeoPixelBus patterns (like unchecked malloc in construct() methods) rather than diverging until improvements are made upstream first, to minimize maintenance burden and keep the codebase aligned.
📚 Learning: 2025-11-20T00:04:04.829Z
Learnt from: netmindz
Repo: wled/WLED PR: 5093
File: wled00/util.cpp:1159-1182
Timestamp: 2025-11-20T00:04:04.829Z
Learning: In WLED PR #5093, the deviceId feature is designed for opt-in usage reporting that tracks only version/upgrade information (non-behavioral data), not user activity patterns. The deterministic salt approach (MAC + "WLED" + chip model/revision) is acceptable for this limited use case, as correlating MAC addresses to version history represents minimal privacy risk compared to behavioral tracking.
Applied to files:
wled00/wled_metadata.hwled00/wled_metadata.cpp
📚 Learning: 2025-08-31T03:38:14.114Z
Learnt from: BobLoeffler68
Repo: wled/WLED PR: 4891
File: wled00/FX.cpp:3333-3349
Timestamp: 2025-08-31T03:38:14.114Z
Learning: WLED PacMan effect (wled00/FX.cpp): Keep pacmancharacters_t position fields as signed int (not int16_t). Maintainer preference (blazoncek) prioritizes avoiding potential overhead/regressions over minor RAM savings. Avoid type shrinking here unless memory pressure is demonstrated.
Applied to files:
wled00/wled_metadata.h
📚 Learning: 2025-11-14T13:37:11.994Z
Learnt from: softhack007
Repo: wled/WLED PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-14T13:37:11.994Z
Learning: In WLED code reviews, when code is modified or added, look for "magic numbers" (hardcoded numeric literals) and suggest replacing them with appropriate defined constants when those constants are meaningful in the context of the PR. For example, the hardcoded value 32 should be replaced with WLED_MAX_SEGNAME_LEN when it represents a segment name length limit. This improves code maintainability and reduces the risk of inconsistencies.
Applied to files:
wled00/wled_metadata.hwled00/wled_metadata.cpp
📚 Learning: 2025-10-05T15:24:05.545Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: wled/WLED PR: 0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-10-05T15:24:05.545Z
Learning: Applies to wled00/html_*.h : DO NOT edit generated embedded web header files (wled00/html_*.h)
Applied to files:
wled00/wled_metadata.h
📚 Learning: 2025-10-10T18:34:06.550Z
Learnt from: DedeHai
Repo: wled/WLED PR: 4997
File: wled00/e131.cpp:33-44
Timestamp: 2025-10-10T18:34:06.550Z
Learning: In WLED's DDP packet handling (ws.cpp and e131.cpp), only prevent out-of-bounds memory access rather than enforcing DDP spec compliance. Don't check the 1440-byte spec limit—accept out-of-spec packets assuming correct encoding. The bounds check `maxDataIndex = c + numLeds * ddpChannelsPerLed; if (maxDataIndex > dataLen) reject` is sufficient and already covers the timecode flag case (when c=4) without needing separate validation.
Applied to files:
wled00/wled_metadata.hwled00/wled_metadata.cpp
📚 Learning: 2025-11-14T13:37:30.955Z
Learnt from: softhack007
Repo: wled/WLED PR: 0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-14T13:37:30.955Z
Learning: In WLED code reviews, when code is modified or added, look for "magic numbers" (hardcoded numeric literals) and suggest replacing them with defined constants when meaningful constants exist in the codebase. For example, suggest replacing hardcoded "32" with WLED_MAX_SEGNAME_LEN if the context relates to segment name length limits.
Applied to files:
wled00/wled_metadata.hwled00/wled_metadata.cpp
📚 Learning: 2025-11-16T19:40:46.260Z
Learnt from: DedeHai
Repo: wled/WLED PR: 4926
File: wled00/FX.cpp:4727-4730
Timestamp: 2025-11-16T19:40:46.260Z
Learning: WLED AuroraWave (wled00/FX.cpp): wave_start and wave_end intentionally use int16_t; segments longer than 32k LEDs are not supported (bounded by MAX_LEDS), so widening to 32-bit is unnecessary.
Applied to files:
wled00/wled_metadata.hwled00/wled_metadata.cpp
📚 Learning: 2025-08-21T00:00:17.196Z
Learnt from: willmmiles
Repo: wled/WLED PR: 4859
File: usermods/udp_name_sync/udp_name_sync.cpp:62-70
Timestamp: 2025-08-21T00:00:17.196Z
Learning: In WLED codebase, UDP packet processing code must never rely on null termination being present on the wire and must always validate packet size first. The codebase already has some vulnerabilities where malformed data can crash the software, so avoiding introduction of new ones is a priority.
Applied to files:
wled00/wled_metadata.hwled00/wled_metadata.cpp
📚 Learning: 2025-07-31T18:21:49.868Z
Learnt from: DedeHai
Repo: wled/WLED PR: 4793
File: wled00/file.cpp:481-513
Timestamp: 2025-07-31T18:21:49.868Z
Learning: In WLED, essential configuration files that require backup have short, controlled names (like "/cfg.json", "/presets.json") that are well within a 32-character buffer limit. The file naming is controlled by developers, making buffer overflow in backup filename construction highly unlikely.
Applied to files:
wled00/wled_metadata.h
📚 Learning: 2025-10-11T17:56:24.923Z
Learnt from: willmmiles
Repo: wled/WLED PR: 4998
File: wled00/ota_update.cpp:120-124
Timestamp: 2025-10-11T17:56:24.923Z
Learning: In the WLED OTA update implementation (wled00/ota_update.cpp), the parameter name for bypassing OTA validation is "skipValidation", not "ignoreRelease". The intent evolved from the original spec in issue #4929 to disable all validation checks, not just release name checks, which is why the broader parameter name "skipValidation" is used.
Applied to files:
wled00/wled_metadata.hwled00/wled_metadata.cpp
📚 Learning: 2025-02-19T12:43:34.199Z
Learnt from: blazoncek
Repo: wled/WLED PR: 4482
File: wled00/udp.cpp:147-149
Timestamp: 2025-02-19T12:43:34.199Z
Learning: ESP8266 and ESP32 platforms have different maximum segment name lengths in WLED, which can cause truncation when syncing segment names between devices. This platform difference affects the user experience when using the segment name sync feature.
Applied to files:
wled00/wled_metadata.cpp
📚 Learning: 2025-08-28T08:09:20.630Z
Learnt from: mval-sg
Repo: wled/WLED PR: 4876
File: wled00/xml.cpp:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-08-28T08:09:20.630Z
Learning: The WLED codebase has opportunities for refactoring hardcoded array bounds (like the "15" used for DMX channels) to use sizeof(array)/sizeof(array[0]) for more maintainable code, but such changes should be done consistently across the entire codebase in a dedicated refactoring effort.
Applied to files:
wled00/wled_metadata.cpp
📚 Learning: 2025-04-26T19:19:07.600Z
Learnt from: blazoncek
Repo: wled/WLED PR: 4658
File: wled00/const.h:140-141
Timestamp: 2025-04-26T19:19:07.600Z
Learning: In WLED, the WLED_MAX_PANELS macro is intentionally defined as a fixed constant value (18) with no redefinition mechanism, making it "unoverridable" - there's no need for a static assertion to check its maximum value.
Applied to files:
wled00/wled_metadata.cpp
📚 Learning: 2025-05-09T18:43:15.355Z
Learnt from: DedeHai
Repo: wled/WLED PR: 4682
File: wled00/FX.cpp:8997-9005
Timestamp: 2025-05-09T18:43:15.355Z
Learning: In the WLED codebase, SEGMENT.custom3 is always constrained to the range 0-31 and will not exceed this range.
Applied to files:
wled00/wled_metadata.cpp
📚 Learning: 2025-02-19T12:43:34.200Z
Learnt from: blazoncek
Repo: wled/WLED PR: 4482
File: wled00/udp.cpp:147-149
Timestamp: 2025-02-19T12:43:34.200Z
Learning: In WLED, maximum segment name length varies by platform:
- ESP8266: 32 characters (WLED_MAX_SEGNAME_LEN = 32)
- ESP32: 64 characters (WLED_MAX_SEGNAME_LEN = 64)
This platform difference can cause truncation when syncing longer names from ESP32 to ESP8266. Additionally, the WLED UI has limitations regarding modified maximum segment name lengths.
Applied to files:
wled00/wled_metadata.cpp
📚 Learning: 2025-09-16T18:08:42.848Z
Learnt from: DedeHai
Repo: wled/WLED PR: 4939
File: wled00/FX_fcn.cpp:1176-1187
Timestamp: 2025-09-16T18:08:42.848Z
Learning: In WLED finalizeInit() bus creation (wled00/FX_fcn.cpp), intentionally allowing memory overruns when bus configurations exceed MAX_LED_MEMORY is a deliberate design choice. The trade-off prioritizes creating buses with reduced LED counts over completely failing to create buses, which would cause no LED output and UI failures. This approach forces users to update configurations after migrating to version 0.16 while maintaining basic functionality.
Applied to files:
wled00/wled_metadata.cpp
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (14)
- GitHub Check: wled_build / Build Environments (esp32c3dev_qio)
- GitHub Check: wled_build / Build Environments (usermods)
- GitHub Check: wled_build / Build Environments (esp32s3dev_8MB_opi)
- GitHub Check: wled_build / Build Environments (esp32s3_4M_qspi)
- GitHub Check: wled_build / Build Environments (esp32S3_wroom2)
- GitHub Check: wled_build / Build Environments (esp32_wrover)
- GitHub Check: wled_build / Build Environments (esp32c3dev)
- GitHub Check: wled_build / Build Environments (esp32dev_debug)
- GitHub Check: wled_build / Build Environments (esp32s3dev_16MB_opi)
- GitHub Check: wled_build / Build Environments (lolin_s2_mini)
- GitHub Check: wled_build / Build Environments (esp32dev)
- GitHub Check: wled_build / Build Environments (esp32_eth)
- GitHub Check: wled_build / Build Environments (nodemcuv2_compat)
- GitHub Check: wled_build / Build Environments (nodemcuv2_160)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
wled00/wled_metadata.h (1)
29-29: LGTM!The new
safe_update_version[3]field is well-placed and appropriately sized for storing semantic version components. The comment clearly documents its purpose.wled00/wled_metadata.cpp (3)
19-19: LGTM!The version bump with clear documentation of what each version represents is good practice for protocol evolution.
150-157: LGTM!The updated error message "Firmware release name mismatch" more accurately describes the validation being performed.
159-187: LGTM!The version safety check logic correctly implements semantic version comparison with appropriate handling:
- Lexicographic comparison of major, minor, patch components
- Graceful handling of malformed version strings (allows update)
- Early exit when current version is definitively newer
The approach of parsing the version string at runtime rather than storing it in parsed form keeps the build metadata simpler.
Replacement for #5057 with compatibility fixes added.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.