Document fieldset formwidget - #258
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 54 minutes Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. How can I continue?Wait for the limit to reset, then comment An organization admin can change what happens after included review limits in Billing. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits within each organization. For paid Pro and Pro+ reviews, CodeRabbit uses a developer's included PR review attempts over the past 7 days to set the current hourly allowance. At typical activity levels, the full plan allowance applies. Higher sustained activity can lower the allowance until earlier attempts leave the 7-day window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. WalkthroughAdds Fieldset documentation to Changes
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to This documentation-only change introduces no actionable merge-blocking risk and is merge-ready after normal checks and review. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
backend/forms.md (1)
1031-1031: Consider using standard double asterisks for emphasis.The triple asterisks (
***visually***) will render as bold italic, which is somewhat unusual. Consider using double asterisks for standard bold emphasis to maintain consistency with common markdown conventions.📝 Suggested change
-A fieldset provides a way of ***visually*** grouping fields. The form definition does not support tabs or secondary tabs as it is only used to define the fields for grouping purpose. +A fieldset provides a way of **visually** grouping fields. The form definition does not support tabs or secondary tabs as it is only used to define the fields for grouping purpose.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@backend/forms.md` at line 1031, Replace the unusual bold-italic emphasis by changing the triple asterisks around "visually" to standard double asterisks in the sentence "A fieldset provides a way of ***visually*** grouping fields." (i.e., update "***visually***" to "**visually**") so the text uses consistent Markdown bold formatting in backend/forms.md.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@backend/forms.md`:
- Around line 1009-1011: The documentation line describing fieldset should
escape the HTML element name by wrapping the <fieldset> tags in backticks;
update the text around the `fieldset` entry so both occurrences of <fieldset>
are written as code literals (e.g., `<fieldset>`) to match the file's existing
pattern for HTML elements and avoid rendering them as real HTML in the docs.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@backend/forms.md`:
- Line 1031: Replace the unusual bold-italic emphasis by changing the triple
asterisks around "visually" to standard double asterisks in the sentence "A
fieldset provides a way of ***visually*** grouping fields." (i.e., update
"***visually***" to "**visually**") so the text uses consistent Markdown bold
formatting in backend/forms.md.
|
|
||
| `fieldset` - renders a group of fields in a <fieldset> tag. | ||
|
|
||
| > **NOTE:** Contrary to the [nestedform](#nested-form), the fields defined in a fieldset are part of the main form. They are only grouped visually within the `<fieldset>` tag. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mjauvin can you add a similar note to the nestedform section
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
backend/forms.md (1)
1011-1011: Use consistent link text that matches the section title.The link text "nestedform" should match the actual section title "Nested Form" for consistency with other cross-references in the documentation.
📝 Proposed fix
-> **NOTE:** Contrary to the [nestedform](`#nested-form`), the fields defined in a fieldset are part of the main form. They are only grouped visually within the `<fieldset>` tag. +> **NOTE:** Contrary to the [Nested Form](`#nested-form`), the fields defined in a fieldset are part of the main form. They are only grouped visually within the `<fieldset>` tag.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@backend/forms.md` at line 1011, Update the cross-reference link text so it matches the section title: replace the markdown link text "[nestedform](`#nested-form`)" with "[Nested Form](`#nested-form`)" in the sentence shown (the anchor "#nested-form" stays unchanged) so the visible link matches the "Nested Form" section title.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@backend/forms.md`:
- Line 1031: Fix the grammar in the sentence inside the form description by
changing the phrase "for grouping purpose" to "for grouping purposes" so the
sentence reads that the form definition is only used to define the fields for
grouping purposes; locate this text in the form description string (the sentence
starting "The form definition does not support tabs or secondary tabs as it is
only used to define the fields for grouping...") and update the plural.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@backend/forms.md`:
- Line 1011: Update the cross-reference link text so it matches the section
title: replace the markdown link text "[nestedform](`#nested-form`)" with "[Nested
Form](`#nested-form`)" in the sentence shown (the anchor "#nested-form" stays
unchanged) so the visible link matches the "Nested Form" section title.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2 participants
Related to: wintercms/winter#1435
Summary by CodeRabbit