Push ScalarFn after Filter/Slice(x) if ScalarFn(x) has a registered kernel - #9766
Push ScalarFn after Filter/Slice(x) if ScalarFn(x) has a registered kernel#9766myrrc wants to merge 6 commits into
Performance Gate Passed
⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected
Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.
For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.
⚠️ Different runtime environments detected
Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.
⚡ 6 improved benchmarks
✅ 409 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 1990 skipped benchmarks1
Performance Changes
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | WallTime | arrow_checked_add_u32_neon[16384] |
20.5 µs | 12.7 µs | +61.21% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | decompress[u8, (4000, 1024)] |
45.4 µs | 33.4 µs | +35.65% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | arrow_checked_add_u32_avx2[16384] |
21.4 µs | 17.7 µs | +21.2% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | decompress[u64, (4000, 1024)] |
85.5 µs | 70.6 µs | +21.04% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | decompress[u16, (4000, 256)] |
58.5 µs | 50.9 µs | +14.94% |
| ⚡ | WallTime | filtered_sink_i64_neon[NineNullsInTen] |
28.5 µs | 25.6 µs | +11.17% |
Tip
Curious why performance improved? Comment @codspeedbot explain why performance improved on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing myrrc/push-binary-into-filter (50bc21e) with develop (a997c3f)
Footnotes
-
1990 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩