Better fixed-width buffer filtering by robert3005 · Pull Request #8723 · vortex-data/vortex

2 benchmarks regressed

⚡ 13 improved benchmarks
❌ 2 regressed benchmarks
✅ 1653 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 38 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Mode	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	`slice_empty_vortex`	339.4 ns	397.8 ns	-14.66%
❌	Simulation	`chunked_varbinview_opt_canonical_into[(100, 100)]`	305.4 µs	340.6 µs	-10.34%
⚡	Simulation	`patterns_i128[Contiguous]`	234.3 µs	17.9 µs	×13
⚡	Simulation	`random_i64[0.5]`	204.1 µs	132 µs	+54.64%
⚡	Simulation	`random_i64[0.8]`	277.3 µs	186 µs	+49.08%
⚡	Simulation	`patterns_i128[Runs]`	244.5 µs	174 µs	+40.53%
⚡	Simulation	`random_i128[0.8]`	388.8 µs	277.5 µs	+40.11%
⚡	Simulation	`patterns_i128[Random]`	290.1 µs	219.4 µs	+32.24%
⚡	Simulation	`random_i128[0.5]`	289.4 µs	219.5 µs	+31.81%
⚡	Simulation	`random_i256[0.5]`	474.5 µs	375.2 µs	+26.48%
⚡	Simulation	`chunked_varbinview_canonical_into[(1000, 10)]`	190.9 µs	154.5 µs	+23.51%
⚡	Simulation	`random_i256[0.8]`	646.1 µs	527.3 µs	+22.53%
⚡	Simulation	`bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[128]`	215.3 ns	186.1 ns	+15.67%
⚡	Simulation	`bitwise_not_vortex_buffer_mut[1024]`	275.6 ns	246.4 ns	+11.84%
⚡	Simulation	`compact[(4096, 90)]`	896.4 ns	808.9 ns	+10.82%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

_{Comparing rk/filterbuffer (8633f26) with develop (0c7e0ff)}

38 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩