Skip to content

Execute interleaved decimal arrays - #10940

Merged
connortsui20 merged 6 commits into
developfrom
ct/decimal-interleave
Oct 29, 2026
Merged

connortsui20 merged 6 commits into
developfrom
ct/decimal-interleave

Note that the non-canonical decimal Interleave copy goes away

4e054c4
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
CodSpeed / CodSpeed Performance Analysis failed Oct 28, 2026 in 4m 30s

5 benchmarks regressed

2 warnings

⚠️ Walltime results may be unreliable

Some benchmarks used the Walltime instrument outside CodSpeed Macro Runners, which can make the results inconsistent.

Learn more about Macro Runners

See affected benchmarks

⚠️ 3 benchmarks are dominated by system calls

System calls cannot be simulated consistently and are left out of the measure. The reported value understates the real cost. Switch to the Walltime instrument to measure them.

Learn more about system calls

See affected benchmarks

⚡ 3 improved benchmarks
❌ 5 regressed benchmarks
✅ 2266 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 370 skipped benchmarks1
🗄️ 30 archived benchmarks run2

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
❌ CPU Simulation random_i8[0.01] 99 µs 123.3 µs -19.72%
❌ CPU Simulation encode_primitives[u8, (2000, 4)] 136.2 µs 164.7 µs -17.29%
❌ CPU Simulation filter_powerlaw_by_correlated_runs[100000] 51.2 µs 61.9 µs -17.2%
❌ CPU Simulation take_filter_list_small_uncached_random_mask_random_indices[768, 10] 105.4 µs 119.4 µs -11.72%
❌ CPU Simulation max_f64 282 µs 315.2 µs -10.52%
⚡ Walltime mul_u64_nonnull_neon 38.9 µs 20.3 µs +92.09%
⚡ Walltime lt_i64_nullable_avx512 8.1 µs 7.3 µs +10.91%
⚡ Walltime deferred_bool_avx2[16384, (Columns, NullOnlyFailure)] 302 µs 273.6 µs +10.38%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.


Comparing ct/decimal-interleave (4e054c4) with develop (40e0b1c)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 370 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

  2. 30 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them. ↩