docs: fix broken REVIEWING.md links in SECURITY.md#25833
Conversation
|
Thank you for your contribution! Before we can merge this PR, please sign our Contributor License Agreement. To sign, copy and post the phrase below as a new comment on this PR.
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request. Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot. |
|
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA
.
…On Tue, 14 Jul 2026 at 17:25 datadog-vectordotdev[bot] < ***@***.***> wrote:
*datadog-vectordotdev[bot]* left a comment (vectordotdev/vector#25833)
<#25833 (comment)>
[image: Pipelines]
<https://cose.datadoghq.com/ci/pipeline-executions?query=ci_level%3Ajob+%40ci.status%3Aerror+%40git.commit.sha%3Ae710abc077a1f279f8fca17b2c3dd056a97e893a&referrer=pr-comment&start=1784037279000>
|
@kobihikri Thank you. Please just comment the following: |
What this fixes
SECURITY.mdlinks to the reviewing guide three times using a repo-root-relative path, but the file actually lives indocs/, so all three links 404:[Reviewing guide](REVIEWING.md)[reviewing](REVIEWING.md)[Reviewing guide](REVIEWING.md#dependencies)Since
SECURITY.mdis at the repo root, GitHub resolves these to/blob/master/REVIEWING.md, which doesn't exist. This PR points them atdocs/REVIEWING.md(the real location).Verification
Docs-only change, three link paths, no content edits. The security policy relies on the "dependency review" section it links to, so the fix keeps that guidance reachable.
Disclosure: I used an AI tool to help spot this and prepare the change; I verified the paths against the repo myself and take responsibility for it.