gnu/usage_vs_refs.sh checks that all options appear in GNU's texi docs.

[sylvestre]

we have some extra options + we don't need this test

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/rm/isatty (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/tail/retry (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/cut/bounded-memory (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/date/resolution (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/pr/bounded-memory (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 3.01%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

❌ 1 regressed benchmark
✅ 356 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 50 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	Simulation	du_summarize_balanced_tree[(5, 4, 10)]	15.9 ms	16.4 ms	-3.01%

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing sylvestre:usage (5981fb9) with main (9504124)}

Footnotes

1. 50 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩