Skip to content

fix(docker): tolerate unavailable IPv6 loopback#2081

Merged
ntohidi merged 1 commit into
unclecode:developfrom
nightcityblade:fix/issue-2078
Jul 20, 2026
Merged

fix(docker): tolerate unavailable IPv6 loopback#2081
ntohidi merged 1 commit into
unclecode:developfrom
nightcityblade:fix/issue-2078

Conversation

@nightcityblade

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Fixes #2078.

Make Redis's IPv6 loopback bind optional while retaining mandatory IPv4 loopback binding. Redis therefore starts on IPv4-only hosts instead of aborting when ::1 is unavailable, while continuing to listen on IPv6 loopback where supported.

List of files changed and why

  • deploy/docker/supervisord.conf - Prefix the IPv6 loopback address with Redis's optional-address marker.
  • deploy/docker/tests/test_security_container_posture.py - Require the IPv4 loopback plus optional IPv6 bind form in the container posture test.

How Has This Been Tested?

  • PYTHONPATH=. pytest -q deploy/docker/tests/test_security_container_posture.py — 19 passed.
  • PYTHONPATH=. pytest -q deploy/docker/tests/test_security_*.py — 316 passed, 1 expected xfail.
  • black --check --target-version py312 --line-ranges 77-84 deploy/docker/tests/test_security_container_posture.py — passed.
  • git diff --check — passed.

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas — N/A; the existing comment already describes the loopback-only Redis binding.
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation — N/A; this corrects container startup behavior without changing the documented interface.
  • I have added/updated unit tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

@ntohidi
ntohidi changed the base branch from main to develop July 20, 2026 09:03
@ntohidi
ntohidi merged commit 2d8f673 into unclecode:develop Jul 20, 2026
2 of 3 checks passed
@ntohidi

ntohidi commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Thanks for the quick and clean fix, @nightcityblade!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: docker installation fails

2 participants