4233 global power imbalance output by mkovari · Pull Request #4417 · ukaea/PROCESS

mkovari · 2026-07-07T12:51:04Z

This implements issue #4233. I have restored the power accounting section in the output files.
Note the powers do not balance - see issue for details.
The only changes are additional outputs.
I have merged main into this branch, but's a long time since I have made a merge request - let me know if there are any problems. I have no idea how to update the outputs of the regression tests, or if I need to do this.
I will create new issues to resolve the imbalances. Those will need to be looked at by Chris and others - for the moment I suggest any of the people on the maintainer list are sufficient.

codecov-commenter · 2026-07-07T13:00:17Z

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 85 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 48.74%. Comparing base (1eeee1f) to head (6dec312).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
process/models/physics/physics.py	0.00%	85 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4417      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   48.87%   48.74%   -0.14%     
==========================================
  Files         151      151              
  Lines       29424    29505      +81     
==========================================
  Hits        14381    14381              
- Misses      15043    15124      +81

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

timothy-nunn

Just some suggestions from a quick code review. Will check the calculations in another review.

timothy-nunn · 2026-07-07T14:15:07Z

        if self.data.physics.i_plasma_ignited == 1:
            po.ocmmnt(self.outfile, "  (Injected power only used for start-up phase)")

+        # Global power imbalance output #4233  ########################################


Suggested change

# Global power imbalance output #4233 ########################################

Row of # removed. Comment unchanged

timothy-nunn · 2026-07-07T14:16:27Z

+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Plasma power imbalance (MW)",
+            "(p_plasma_out - p_plasma_in)",


Suggested change

"(p_plasma_out - p_plasma_in)",

"(p_plasma_out_subtract_p_plasma_in)",

I don't think this will be able to be indexed from the MFILE properly

All these have been replaced by new variables:
"(p_plasma_imbalance_mw)",
etc

timothy-nunn · 2026-07-07T14:16:56Z

+        if abs(p_plasma_out - p_plasma_in) > 0.1:
+            logger.error("Plasma power imbalance > 0.1 MW")
+
+        ####################################################


Suggested change

####################################################

I know these still exist in the code but I try and keep them at a minimum

timothy-nunn · 2026-07-07T14:18:48Z

+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Electric power imbalance (MW)",
+            "()",


Can you assign this an output name otherwise I suspect it will cause issues in the MFILE parsing at some point

New variable

timothy-nunn · 2026-07-07T14:19:15Z

+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Power plant overall imbalance (MW)",
+            "(p_plant_in_mw - p_plant_out_mw)",


Suggested change

"(p_plant_in_mw - p_plant_out_mw)",

"(p_plant_in_mw_subtract_p_plant_out_mw)",

New variable

timothy-nunn

A lot of these variables are already being output in the same routine/in other models. I don't see a reason to do this twice?

timothy-nunn · 2026-07-07T14:27:23Z

+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Net power transported by electrons (MW)",
+            "(p_electron_transport_loss_mw)",
+            self.data.physics.p_electron_transport_loss_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )
+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Net power transported by ions (MW)",
+            "(p_ion_transport_loss_mw)",
+            self.data.physics.p_ion_transport_loss_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )


These variables are already output above

Suggested change

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Net power transported by electrons (MW)",

"(p_electron_transport_loss_mw)",

self.data.physics.p_electron_transport_loss_mw,

"OP ",

)

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Net power transported by ions (MW)",

"(p_ion_transport_loss_mw)",

self.data.physics.p_ion_transport_loss_mw,

"OP ",

)

Indeed. Nevertheless, we need to check that the powers balance, and there is no easy way to check that from the existing outputs. A certain amount of redundancy is not a big deal. It may be possible to slim down the rest of the output file - I can look at that, but that would be another issue.

In theory one could hide the output if it balances, and display it only if there is a discrepancy, but I don't really see the benefit.

I have removed a couple of duplications.
The electric power requirements are output in a somewhat redundant way. I will look at this in a separate issue.

timothy-nunn · 2026-07-07T14:28:00Z

+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Net loss by synchrotron radiation (MW)",
+            "(p_plasma_sync_mw)",
+            self.data.physics.p_plasma_sync_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )


Already output above

Suggested change

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Net loss by synchrotron radiation (MW)",

"(p_plasma_sync_mw)",

self.data.physics.p_plasma_sync_mw,

"OP ",

)

timothy-nunn · 2026-07-07T14:29:10Z

+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Alpha power (MW)",
+            "(p_alpha_total_mw)",
+            self.data.physics.p_alpha_total_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )
+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Power from p, 3He, T products of DD and/or D-He3 fusion (MW)",
+            "(p_non_alpha_charged_mw)",
+            self.data.physics.p_non_alpha_charged_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )
+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Injected power (MW)",
+            "(p_hcd_injected_total_mw)",
+            self.data.current_drive.p_hcd_injected_total_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )
+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Ohmic heating (MW)",
+            "(p_plasma_ohmic_mw)",
+            self.data.physics.p_plasma_ohmic_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )


Suggested change

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Alpha power (MW)",

"(p_alpha_total_mw)",

self.data.physics.p_alpha_total_mw,

"OP ",

)

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Power from p, 3He, T products of DD and/or D-He3 fusion (MW)",

"(p_non_alpha_charged_mw)",

self.data.physics.p_non_alpha_charged_mw,

"OP ",

)

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Injected power (MW)",

"(p_hcd_injected_total_mw)",

self.data.current_drive.p_hcd_injected_total_mw,

"OP ",

)

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Ohmic heating (MW)",

"(p_plasma_ohmic_mw)",

self.data.physics.p_plasma_ohmic_mw,

"OP ",

)

Already output above

timothy-nunn · 2026-07-07T14:30:27Z

+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Fusion power (MW)",
+            "(p_fusion_total_mw)",
+            self.data.physics.p_fusion_total_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )
+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Energy multiplication in blanket and shield (MW)",
+            "(p_blkt_multiplication_mw)",
+            self.data.fwbs.p_blkt_multiplication_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )
+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Injected power (MW)",
+            "(p_hcd_injected_total_mw)",
+            self.data.current_drive.p_hcd_injected_total_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )
+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Ohmic heating (MW)",
+            "(p_plasma_ohmic_mw)",
+            self.data.physics.p_plasma_ohmic_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )


Suggested change

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Fusion power (MW)",

"(p_fusion_total_mw)",

self.data.physics.p_fusion_total_mw,

"OP ",

)

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Energy multiplication in blanket and shield (MW)",

"(p_blkt_multiplication_mw)",

self.data.fwbs.p_blkt_multiplication_mw,

"OP ",

)

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Injected power (MW)",

"(p_hcd_injected_total_mw)",

self.data.current_drive.p_hcd_injected_total_mw,

"OP ",

)

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Ohmic heating (MW)",

"(p_plasma_ohmic_mw)",

self.data.physics.p_plasma_ohmic_mw,

"OP ",

)

Already output above

timothy-nunn · 2026-07-07T14:31:35Z

+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Power deposited by pump in coolant for FW and blanket circuit (MW)",
+            "(p_fw_blkt_coolant_pump_mw)",
+            self.data.primary_pumping.p_fw_blkt_coolant_pump_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )
+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Power deposited by pump in coolant for divertor circuit (MW)",
+            "(p_div_coolant_pump_mw)",
+            self.data.heat_transport.p_div_coolant_pump_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )


Already output in another module

Suggested change

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Power deposited by pump in coolant for FW and blanket circuit (MW)",

"(p_fw_blkt_coolant_pump_mw)",

self.data.primary_pumping.p_fw_blkt_coolant_pump_mw,

"OP ",

)

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Power deposited by pump in coolant for divertor circuit (MW)",

"(p_div_coolant_pump_mw)",

self.data.heat_transport.p_div_coolant_pump_mw,

"OP ",

)

timothy-nunn · 2026-07-07T14:34:47Z

+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Net electric (MW)",
+            "(p_plant_electric_net_mw)",
+            self.data.heat_transport.p_plant_electric_net_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )
+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "TF coils electric power (MW)",
+            "(p_tf_electric_supplies_mw)",
+            self.data.heat_transport.p_tf_electric_supplies_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )
+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "PF coils electric power (MW)",
+            "(p_pf_electric_supplies_mw)",
+            self.data.pf_coil.p_pf_electric_supplies_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )
+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Heating and current drive electric power  (MW)",
+            "(p_hcd_electric_total_mw)",
+            self.data.heat_transport.p_hcd_electric_total_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )
+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Primary coolant pump electric power (MW)",
+            "(p_coolant_pump_elec_total_mw)",
+            self.data.heat_transport.p_coolant_pump_elec_total_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )


Already being output in another model

Suggested change

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Net electric (MW)",

"(p_plant_electric_net_mw)",

self.data.heat_transport.p_plant_electric_net_mw,

"OP ",

)

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"TF coils electric power (MW)",

"(p_tf_electric_supplies_mw)",

self.data.heat_transport.p_tf_electric_supplies_mw,

"OP ",

)

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"PF coils electric power (MW)",

"(p_pf_electric_supplies_mw)",

self.data.pf_coil.p_pf_electric_supplies_mw,

"OP ",

)

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Heating and current drive electric power (MW)",

"(p_hcd_electric_total_mw)",

self.data.heat_transport.p_hcd_electric_total_mw,

"OP ",

)

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Primary coolant pump electric power (MW)",

"(p_coolant_pump_elec_total_mw)",

self.data.heat_transport.p_coolant_pump_elec_total_mw,

"OP ",

)

timothy-nunn · 2026-07-07T14:35:22Z

+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Vacuum pumps electric power (MW)",
+            "(vachtmw)",
+            self.data.heat_transport.vachtmw,
+            "OP ",
+        )
+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Cryoplant electric power (MW)",
+            "(p_cryo_plant_electric_mw)",
+            self.data.heat_transport.p_cryo_plant_electric_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )


Suggested change

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Vacuum pumps electric power (MW)",

"(vachtmw)",

self.data.heat_transport.vachtmw,

"OP ",

)

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Cryoplant electric power (MW)",

"(p_cryo_plant_electric_mw)",

self.data.heat_transport.p_cryo_plant_electric_mw,

"OP ",

)

Already being output

timothy-nunn · 2026-07-07T14:35:53Z

+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Gross electric output (MW)",
+            "(p_plant_electric_gross_mw)",
+            self.data.heat_transport.p_plant_electric_gross_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )


Suggested change

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Gross electric output (MW)",

"(p_plant_electric_gross_mw)",

self.data.heat_transport.p_plant_electric_gross_mw,

"OP ",

)

Already being output

timothy-nunn · 2026-07-07T14:36:27Z

+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Fusion power (MW)",
+            "(p_fusion_total_mw)",
+            self.data.physics.p_fusion_total_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )
+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Energy multiplication in blanket and shield (MW)",
+            "(p_blkt_multiplication_mw)",
+            self.data.fwbs.p_blkt_multiplication_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )


Suggested change

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Fusion power (MW)",

"(p_fusion_total_mw)",

self.data.physics.p_fusion_total_mw,

"OP ",

)

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Energy multiplication in blanket and shield (MW)",

"(p_blkt_multiplication_mw)",

self.data.fwbs.p_blkt_multiplication_mw,

"OP ",

)

Already being output

timothy-nunn · 2026-07-07T14:37:21Z

+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Net electric (MW)",
+            "(p_plant_electric_net_mw)",
+            self.data.heat_transport.p_plant_electric_net_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )
+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Heat rejected by main power conversion circuit (MW)",
+            "(p_turbine_loss_mw)",
+            self.data.power.p_turbine_loss_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )
+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,
+            "Heat rejected by other circuits (secondary heat) (MW)",
+            "(p_plant_secondary_heat_mw)",
+            self.data.heat_transport.p_plant_secondary_heat_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )


Already output in another model

Suggested change

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Net electric (MW)",

"(p_plant_electric_net_mw)",

self.data.heat_transport.p_plant_electric_net_mw,

"OP ",

)

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Heat rejected by main power conversion circuit (MW)",

"(p_turbine_loss_mw)",

self.data.power.p_turbine_loss_mw,

"OP ",

)

po.ovarre(

self.outfile,

"Heat rejected by other circuits (secondary heat) (MW)",

"(p_plant_secondary_heat_mw)",

self.data.heat_transport.p_plant_secondary_heat_mw,

"OP ",

)

…nks. Some duplicate outputs removed from power.py and hcpb.py

chris-ashe · 2026-07-09T14:42:48Z

@mkovari Can I ask that this is adjusted to use the PlasmaIgnitionModel enum then I shall review

mkovari · 2026-07-09T15:22:18Z

@mkovari Can I ask that this is adjusted to use the PlasmaIgnitionModel enum then I shall review

I have long been concerned about the ignited option. I have never used it and I am not sure we need it. I am not clear why this is here, for example:

        # If the device is not ignited, add the injected auxiliary power
        if PlasmaIgnitionModel(i_plasma_ignited) == PlasmaIgnitionModel.NON_IGNITED:
            p_plasma_loss_mw += p_hcd_injected_total_mw

The power should balance whether the user thinks the plasma is ignited or not.

Leaving this aside, could you clarify how and where I need to use this switch in the power accounting checks? Thanks @chris-ashe

chris-ashe

Few bits about readability and outputting. Some of the calculations are double counting. I will probably put a few spinout PR's out to increase robustness and prevent the need for multiple redundant declaration

chris-ashe · 2026-07-10T09:51:28Z

+            self.data.current_drive.p_hcd_injected_electrons_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )
+        if self.data.physics.i_plasma_ignited == 1:


For the ignition enums from what I have seen the ignited case will never apply any HCD power so it is never added. In reality the number should just be set to zero. See the enum instance in physics_variables.py to apply the correct enum test instead of the raw number matching

OK, so GitHub is showing the code above as green with + signs, indicating it has been added. In fact I didn't touch it, except for removing a couple of now-redundant outputs. My contributions start from line 2288: # Global power imbalance output #4233

In fact in the latest version of main this has already been fixed, by you.
No action (other than merging main back in).

chris-ashe · 2026-07-10T09:55:07Z

+            po.ocmmnt(self.outfile, "  (Injected power only used for start-up phase)")
+
+        # Global power imbalance output #4233
+        po.oheadr(self.outfile, "Power accounting")


Each output should be a separate function and not nested inside of outplas() 3 of the output sections related to the total plant should be put in power.py

I don't see any benefit in making the code more complicated by creating new functions.
I agree that the last three sections could go into power.py. However, there is also something to be said for putting these accounting checks together so it is quick and easy to review them all.
I propose no action.

chris-ashe · 2026-07-10T09:55:46Z

+        )
+        po.ocmmnt(
+            self.outfile,
+            "See Figure in https://ukaea.github.io/PROCESS/physics-models/plasma_power_balance",


The referenced figure is very out of date and none of the variables match, can this please be updated

Yes - for another day. No action.

chris-ashe · 2026-07-10T09:59:56Z

+            + self.data.physics.p_fw_alpha_mw
+        )
+        p_impurity_mw = (
+            self.data.physics.p_plasma_inner_rad_mw


Note that the p_plasma_inner_rad_mw contains the synchrotron contribution as we always assume it to come from just the core region. The variable p_plasma_rad_mw contains all radiation power

Indeed it does.
I will fix this. TODO

Oddly, confinement time.py has these lines:

p_plasma_loss_mw + self.data.physics.pden_plasma_sync_mw * vol_plasma + self.data.physics.p_plasma_inner_rad_mw

which does seem to be double counting.

chris-ashe · 2026-07-10T10:02:35Z

+            + p_impurity_mw
+        )
+
+        p_plasma_in = (


The variable p_plasma_heating_total_mw contains the in-situ calculated value for the total heating power. The function calculate_total_plasma_heating_power() also exists

Indeed. This section functions as a kind of independent audit of the calculations elsewhere. Duplication of effort - yes. Worth doing - also yes, in my opinion.

The quantities defined here are not intended to be used anywhere else.

chris-ashe · 2026-07-10T10:06:54Z

+        p_plasma_imbalance_mw = p_plasma_out - p_plasma_in
+        po.oshead(self.outfile, "Plasma power balance across separatrix")
+        po.ovarre(
+            self.outfile,


Using po.ocmmnt() here to create subheadings for "Heating:" and "Losses:" would increase readability

I will see how this looks. TODO

chris-ashe · 2026-07-10T10:07:56Z

+            "(p_impurity_mw)",
+            p_impurity_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )


Using po.oblnkl(self.outfile) would be good to separate the total value from the summed terms for readability

I will see how this looks. TODO

Done. I didn't separate the total but I put it in caps.

chris-ashe · 2026-07-10T10:10:54Z

+            + self.data.current_drive.p_hcd_injected_total_mw
+            + self.data.physics.p_plasma_ohmic_mw
+        )
+        p_plasma_imbalance_mw = p_plasma_out - p_plasma_in


Would be better hear to do the heating powers minus the loss power so that a returned negative value means a net loss, which makes sense

Will do. TODO

chris-ashe · 2026-07-10T10:11:20Z

+            "(p_plasma_in)",
+            p_plasma_in,
+            "OP ",
+        )


Using po.oblnkl(self.outfile) would be good to separate the total value from the summed terms for readability

Done. I put total in caps.

chris-ashe · 2026-07-10T10:11:24Z

+            "(p_plasma_ohmic_mw)",
+            self.data.physics.p_plasma_ohmic_mw,
+            "OP ",
+        )


Using po.oblnkl(self.outfile) would be good to separate the total value from the summed terms for readability

I will see how this looks. TODO

Done. I didn't put in a blank line but I put it in caps.

… p_plasma_out.

Michael Kovari added 2 commits July 7, 2026 13:27

Power balances coded

ededd0f

Merge branch 'main' into 4233-global-power-imbalance-output

c944cef

mkovari requested a review from a team as a code owner July 7, 2026 12:51

mkovari linked an issue Jul 7, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request

Global power imbalance output #4233

Open

timothy-nunn reviewed Jul 7, 2026

View reviewed changes

timothy-nunn self-assigned this Jul 7, 2026

timothy-nunn reviewed Jul 7, 2026

View reviewed changes

Michael Kovari added 3 commits July 7, 2026 15:40

New variables created for the imbalances

f013aea

Cahnges as requested by Tim. New variables created to fill in the bla…

e21adc3

…nks. Some duplicate outputs removed from power.py and hcpb.py

Merge branch 'main' into 4233-global-power-imbalance-output

1594436

mkovari requested a review from timothy-nunn July 9, 2026 07:41

chris-ashe requested changes Jul 10, 2026

View reviewed changes

Michael Kovari added 2 commits July 10, 2026 14:42

Partly Implemented some formatting suggestions. Replaced rad terms by…

b442ceb

… p_plasma_out.

Merge branch 'main' into 4233-global-power-imbalance-output

6dec312

mkovari requested a review from chris-ashe July 10, 2026 13:47

	"(p_plasma_out - p_plasma_in)",
	"(p_plasma_out_subtract_p_plasma_in)",

	"(p_plant_in_mw - p_plant_out_mw)",
	"(p_plant_in_mw_subtract_p_plant_out_mw)",

Uh oh!

Conversation

mkovari commented Jul 7, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov-commenter commented Jul 7, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

timothy-nunn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

mkovari Jul 8, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

mkovari Jul 7, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

timothy-nunn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

mkovari Jul 8, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

chris-ashe commented Jul 9, 2026

Uh oh!

mkovari commented Jul 9, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

chris-ashe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

mkovari Jul 10, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

mkovari commented Jul 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov-commenter commented Jul 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

mkovari Jul 8, 2026 •

edited

Loading

mkovari Jul 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

mkovari Jul 8, 2026 •

edited

Loading

mkovari commented Jul 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading

mkovari Jul 10, 2026 •

edited

Loading

mkovari Jul 10, 2026 •

edited

Loading

mkovari Jul 10, 2026 •

edited

Loading

mkovari Jul 10, 2026 •

edited

Loading

mkovari Jul 10, 2026 •

edited

Loading