Skip to content

tests: Prepare upstream Azure tests#210

Open
Jakob-Naucke wants to merge 7 commits intotrusted-execution-clusters:mainfrom
Jakob-Naucke:kind-tool
Open

tests: Prepare upstream Azure tests#210
Jakob-Naucke wants to merge 7 commits intotrusted-execution-clusters:mainfrom
Jakob-Naucke:kind-tool

Conversation

@Jakob-Naucke
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

  • track some tools' versions
  • optimize Makefile for partial & parallel installations
  • enable Kind forwarding in tests

See openshift/release#75842 for how I plan to use it

@Jakob-Naucke
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

#201
/retest

@Jakob-Naucke
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

flakes

RUN cargo build -p register-server $(if [ "release" = release ]; then echo --release; fi)
SSL error: unknown error; class=Ssl (16)

/retest

for installation of yq & parallel builds

Signed-off-by: Jakob Naucke <jnaucke@redhat.com>
for autoupdates

Signed-off-by: Jakob Naucke <jnaucke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakob Naucke <jnaucke@redhat.com>
allows for not installing Cargo & downloading a number of packages for
CI.

Signed-off-by: Jakob Naucke <jnaucke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakob Naucke <jnaucke@redhat.com>
@Jakob-Naucke
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

ping @alicefr

Comment thread test_utils/src/lib.rs Outdated
Comment on lines +173 to +174
TRUSTEE_SERVICE => Ok((TRUSTEE_APP_LABEL, TRUSTEE_PORT, 31000)),
REGISTER_SERVER_SERVICE => Ok((REGISTER_SERVER_APP_LABEL, REGISTER_SERVER_PORT, 31001)),
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: can we define these port as constants, in this way we know what they represent

Comment thread lib/src/endpoints.rs Outdated
Comment on lines +21 to +23
pub const KIND_TRUSTEE_PORT: i32 = 31000;
pub const KIND_REGISTER_SERVER_PORT: i32 = 31001;
pub const KIND_ATTESTATION_KEY_REGISTER_PORT: i32 = 31002;
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it the right place here for those constant? They are more related to the test infrastructure

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented May 4, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alicefr, Jakob-Naucke

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

- Introduce kind_public type which exposes services
- Track app labels in lib
- some typos & reference instead of clone

Signed-off-by: Jakob Naucke <jnaucke@redhat.com>
so that tests on Kind with port forwarding can go without conflicts

Signed-off-by: Jakob Naucke <jnaucke@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented May 4, 2026

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented May 4, 2026

@Jakob-Naucke: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/operator-lifecycle-verify 44309b3 link true /test operator-lifecycle-verify

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants