Skip to content

Conversation

@anttimaki
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Also allow submitting the form with enter key press on the text input
as this is the expected behaviour on web forms.

I considered trying to implement the functionality using strongForm's
refiner and onRefinerError methods but that seemed like more trouble
than it's worth, especially given that the strongForm doesn't have
internal "is disabled" state currently.
The links assume they have access to a community id, which they don't
when the user is browsing team settings page. We probably wouldn't want
to link to team's package listing page from here anyway, but rather the
team profile page, which doesn't exist yet. Either way, I don't see the
links being very important in those modals anyway. Someone about to
leave or disband the team probably doesn't care to check the team's
profile one last time?
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Walkthrough

This change modifies team settings forms by refactoring CSS class names and adjusting form styling rules. The .disband-team-form__body class is renamed to .disband-team-form__form with simplified layout properties. In the component file, team names are now displayed as bold spans in confirmation messages for both Leave and Disband forms. A new formDisabled computed state is introduced to the Disband form to gate form submission, and submission flow is wrapped in a form element with conditional onSubmit handling.

Possibly related PRs

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ❓ Inconclusive No description was provided by the author, making it impossible to assess whether it relates to the changeset. Add a description explaining the validation logic, why it was needed, and what problem it solves.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly describes the main change: adding form validation to the disband team form, which aligns with the core modifications in the changeset.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch disband-team-form-validation

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 55d7eb7 and 64f0093.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/cyberstorm-remix/app/settings/teams/team/tabs/Settings/Settings.css (1 hunks)
  • apps/cyberstorm-remix/app/settings/teams/team/tabs/Settings/Settings.tsx (4 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Generate visual diffs
  • GitHub Check: Test
🔇 Additional comments (7)
apps/cyberstorm-remix/app/settings/teams/team/tabs/Settings/Settings.tsx (5)

179-182: LGTM!

Clean approach using a styled span for team name emphasis.


232-233: LGTM!

Straightforward validation logic.


306-323: Good UX: Form enables Enter key submission.

The form wrapper correctly prevents default behavior and gates submission. One consideration: the validation uses strict string equality. If team names are case-insensitive on the backend, users might be confused when their input doesn't match due to casing.


326-337: LGTM!

Button correctly disabled based on validation state. The onClick doesn't need to re-check formDisabled since the button won't be clickable when disabled.


343-343: LGTM!

Correct displayName for React DevTools.

apps/cyberstorm-remix/app/settings/teams/team/tabs/Settings/Settings.css (2)

6-8: LGTM!

Good use of CSS variable for consistent font-weight across the design system.


10-14: LGTM!

Semantic rename aligns with the new form element wrapper in the component.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 22 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 10.82%. Comparing base (55d7eb7) to head (64f0093).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...app/settings/teams/team/tabs/Settings/Settings.tsx 0.00% 22 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1649      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   10.82%   10.82%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         315      315              
  Lines       22681    22683       +2     
  Branches      463      463              
==========================================
  Hits         2455     2455              
- Misses      20226    20228       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants