DO NOT MERGE: bit_pr xlarge load test, attempt 2 (fresh lane) - #10602
Closed
luvkapur wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
DO NOT MERGE: bit_pr xlarge load test, attempt 2 (fresh lane)#10602luvkapur wants to merge 2 commits into
luvkapur wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
…r sizing) Insights (30d, all branches): ~4.8M credits/month (~$2.9k) — e2e_test 3.41M (71%), bit_pr 800k (17%), e2e_test_bbit 200k, bit_merge 153k. - stop persisting .pnpm-store: nothing downstream reads it; it inflated the workspace every node of every job attaches (~2.7min x 40 e2e nodes/run) - e2e_test off master pushes: gates nothing there (bit_merge and the merge queue don't depend on it); a daily canary now runs in nightly instead (~440k credits/month -> ~185k) - e2e_test parallelism 40 -> 30: per-node fixed setup is the only cost that scales with node count (suite time is constant); ~4min wall-clock cost - bit_pr 2xlarge -> xlarge: build is CPU-bound on a single env, 16 cores were idle at 80 credits/min; heap capped at 12GB to fit 16GB RAM (~400k/month if it holds — revert to 2xlarge on 'Killed') - e2e_test_bbit halts on quiet days: no new @teambit/bit version in 24h means the previous nightly already bundled+tested the same thing (32 nodes x 30min) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… ci pr on xlarge (attempt 2, fresh lane) Attempt 1 (#10601) ran 57 min on xlarge with zero OOM signatures, then died on a bit.cloud scope-fetch 500 surfaced as an unhandled rejection. Fresh branch = fresh lane, avoiding the #10583 keep-lane hazard on re-push. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Aug 11, 2026
Merged
Member
Author
|
Verdict recorded: 98-component cascade (2 changed + 96 auto-snapped dependents) succeeded on xlarge, bit ci pr 22 min, job total 25 min (~1,010 credits vs ~2,020 on 2xlarge), zero OOM signatures. xlarge validated for the heavy-PR class; dynamic sizing (planned follow-up) covers anything bigger. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Retry of #10601 — attempt 1 survived 57 min on xlarge with no OOM but died on a bit.cloud scope-fetch 500 (unhandled rejection). Fresh branch for a fresh lane per the #10583 keep-lane hazard note. Will be closed and branch deleted once the bit_pr verdict is recorded.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code