Skip to content

chore: list pull-to-refresh rates under changed in the 2.6.0 changelog - #931

Merged
ovitrif merged 1 commit into
release-2.6.0from
chore/changelog-2.6.0-tidy
Oct 14, 2026
Merged

ovitrif merged 1 commit into
release-2.6.0from
chore/changelog-2.6.0-tidy

Conversation

@ovitrif

@ovitrif ovitrif commented Oct 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Refs: #925

Description

Design

N/A — no UI changes.

Preview

N/A

QA Notes

Journeys

N/A — changelog only.

Manual Tests

CHANGELOG.md 2.6.0 section only; every other line is unchanged. The draft release body follows the changelog, so it needs the same edit when it is regenerated.

@ovitrif ovitrif self-assigned this Oct 14, 2026
@ovitrif
ovitrif requested review from a team, ben-kaufman and coreyphillips and removed request for a team October 14, 2026 14:12
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 14, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-14T14:13:51.532471Z 6a50579 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6a50579012

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread CHANGELOG.md
@greptile-apps

greptile-apps Bot commented Oct 14, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

RetriggerConfidence Score: 5/5

[Low impact] This changelog-only change appears safe to merge.

Summary

Moves the pull-to-refresh and exchange-rate entry (#532) from Fixed to Changed in the 2.6.0 section of CHANGELOG.md.

  • The Home refresh update now appears under “Changed” in the 2.6.0 notes.

Reviews (1) · Last reviewed commit: "chore: list pull-to-refresh rates under ..." · Reviewed by Greptile

@talosmachina talosmachina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No findings. Moves the pull-to-refresh exchange-rate entry (#532) from Fixed to Changed in the 2.6.0 section. Reviewed 6a50579, light tier.

What I checked
  • #532 is a merged pull request whose merge commit is on release-2.6.0.
  • The Android twin (synonymdev/bitkit-android#622) sits under Changed in that repo's 2.6.0 section, so the two changelogs now agree.
  • The entry appears once after the move; section headings are unchanged.
  • CI was still running when I read it.

Merge confidence: 5/5, a changelog-only change with the link checked.

@jvsena42 jvsena42 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No findings. #532 moves from Fixed to Changed, which matches the Android twin (#622 is under Changed in synonymdev/bitkit-android#1473), and nothing else in CHANGELOG.md moved.

@ovitrif
ovitrif merged commit d83bb52 into release-2.6.0 Oct 14, 2026
14 checks passed
@ovitrif
ovitrif deleted the chore/changelog-2.6.0-tidy branch October 14, 2026 21:38
@piotr-iohk piotr-iohk mentioned this pull request Oct 16, 2026
5 of 8 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants