Aero-Structural Discrete Adjoint Sensitivities and Python Wrapper Developments #1750
Open
Aero-Structural Discrete Adjoint Sensitivities and Python Wrapper Developments #1750
Conversation
pcarruscag
approved these changes
Mar 30, 2026
Member
pcarruscag
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you, looks good to me, mostly just comments about naming conventions.
TestCases/py_wrapper/disc_adj_residual_solver/box/flow_forward.cfg
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Contributor
Author
|
@pcarruscag @bigfooted Finally seeing the light at the end of the tunnel on this PR... I added a regression test (which is passing) with an example that compares sens outputs from fixed-point and residuals adjoint solvers. Anything else you want me to address on this? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Fundamental bottlenecks exist for industrial adoption of high-fidelity physics codes with fully coupled discrete adjoint sensitivity analysis. These bottlenecks include a lack of flexibility, modularity, and robustness of the computational tools, as well as the potential startup development costs needed to implement and verify the MDAO features. The purpose of this work is to facilitate the coupling of SU2 with external structural codes (e.g. NASTRAN, TACS, Airbus structural suite Lagrange) for gradient-based aerodynamic shape and structural sizing optimization using dedicated frameworks (e.g. OpenMDAO).
Startup development costs include the creation of modular tools that are designed to be driven by another framework like OpenMDAO, rather than to drive execution themselves. However, leveraging those MDAO frameworks assumes that software codes and modules to be coupled exist, have appropriate data structures, execution and query APIs, and are wrapped in Python for flexibility and ease of use. The proposed changes were motivated with the goal of making SU2 more modular and flexible, particularly to facilitate its integration into large-scale MDAO frameworks. For more details on the motivation, methodology, and verification & validation results, please refer to our paper from AIAA Aviation 2022.
Proposed Changes
@aa-g and I propose the following code updates:
Implementation of residual-based discrete adjoint solver as
CDiscAdjResidualSolvera. New config option:
KIND_DISC_ADJEnhancements and standardization of SU2 Python API
a. Add pysu2/pysu2ad methods
b. Standardize Python API and function names
c. Overloaded getter/setter methods to make data handling more flexible
Related Work
These efforts are related to Issue #1262, Pull Request #1300, and Discussion #1325.
PR Checklist