-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 772
fix(bidi): respect role from BidiTextInputEvent instead of hardcoding user #2083
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
btdeviant
wants to merge
4
commits into
strands-agents:main
Choose a base branch
from
btdeviant:fix/bidi-text-input-role
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+1
−1
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4fe59f7
fix(bidi): respect role from BidiTextInputEvent instead of hardcoding…
btdeviant 91a06a6
Merge branch 'strands-agents:main' into fix/bidi-text-input-role
btdeviant ab325eb
Update versioning to dynamic in pyproject.toml
btdeviant 940877a
chore: revert unrelated pyproject.toml whitespace change
btdeviant File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you elaborate a bit more on the use case here? Note that we do allow you to prefill the initial message history that is sent to the model with assistant messages (
Agent(messages=...)). They are sent separately instart(). Curious though what it would mean for the user to send an assistant message to the model in the middle of a conversation.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I also ran some tests against 2 models (1 from google and 1 from openai). Google rejected the assistant message with an error response and openai seemed to ignore it.
Note, there is also some hardcoding of roles in the model providers themselves that I had to update for the tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@pgrayy good catch on the Google test. Admittedly I'm using a custom adapter for an openai api compatible server (sglang / llama.cpp), and at the risk of being a bit presumptuous, I take your point that this PR may be premature given the official supported clients for BidiAgent are limited.
The use case it addresses is pushing context from async process as an input source, which through some other magic elicits unprompted engagement from the users perspective. A bit atypical I suppose. I can monkey patch around it, not a big deal, just took a bit of debugging to find out why assistant wasn't making it to the model - was a bit of a bear trap :)