-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 353
Add SLP-4 #1838
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add SLP-4 #1838
Conversation
| ## Preamble | ||
|
|
||
| ``` | ||
| SLP: 0003 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
typo: 0004
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for catching that. We should get copilot to review prs for things like this. 🤔
| | Write Entries | 50 | 200 | 500 | 1000 | 5 | | ||
| | Write Bytes | 132096 | 132096 | 143360 | 286720 | 2.17 | | ||
| | Tx Size Bytes | 132096 | 132096 | 133120 | 266240 | 2.01 | | ||
| | Instructions/threads | 100'000'000 | 400'000'000 | 600'000'000 / 1 thread | 580'000'000 / 2 threads | 2.9 | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
New Ledger/Tx Ratio would be 1.45, not 2.9? i.e. 580M/400M
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, it's 2 * 580 / 400 == 2.9. We have 2 threads in this proposal.
|
|
||
| Note, that the close time has increased since SLP-3. Given that the network performance hasn't degraded since then, we propose to relax the threshold for the Soroban apply time to 300ms. The previous threshold of 250ms was very conservative, and a relatively small increase to it shouldn't be able to compromise the network stability. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Benchmarking with proposed limits |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about adding 400M benchmark numbers in the list below?
No description provided.