Repository navigation
Conversation
Distinguish observed crawler challenges from confirmed crawler access, explain preview cache limits, and document verification response projections. Public-safety and command-example checks pass; full checks require CI dependencies.
|
Important Draft PR not reviewedDraft PRs are not automatically reviewed by default.
To automatically review draft PRs, update your CodeRabbit configuration: reviews:
auto_review:
drafts: true
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Add the genuine Googlebot, Bingbot, and GPTBot proper names used by the crawler protection guide. The first docs CI run identified these three dictionary omissions.
This branch was successfully deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What was wrong
Customer items 25 and 28 exposed gaps in crawler and cache-testing guidance. The routing guide did not explain inspecting local header rules, and domains documentation treated every verification projection as DNS ownership proof.
Change
These content-only changes apply directly to main and do not depend on #88, #89, or #90.
Verification
node scripts/verify-public-safety.mjs: passed (1342 files, 3 symlinks).node scripts/verify-command-examples.mjs: passed (567 Markdown files).node scripts/verify-routes.mjs: requires uninstalled@spacefast/routing; full dependency-backed checks will run in CI.Not in this PR
No generated references, routing implementation, or changes from #88–#90.
Need help on this PR? Tag
@codesmith-botwith what you need.Review corrections
Legacy attachment verification can still reflect ownership proof, so the guide now directs readers to certificate diagnostics before treating it as HTTPS-ready. Null TXT diagnostics are inconclusive and do not override ownership instructions. Public-safety and command-example checks passed after this correction; local prose verification could not run because Vale is not installed. Final-head docs CI provides the full prose/build checks.