Fix typo in snyk_rules_smart_apply.md

[jeffsnyk]

Description

Provide description of this PR and changes, if linked Jira ticket doesn't cover it in full.

Checklist

• Read and understood the Code of Conduct and Contributing Guidelines.
• Tests added and all succeed
• Linted
• CHANGELOG.md updated
• README.md updated, if user-facing

Screenshots / GIFs

Visuals that may help the reviewer. Please add screenshots for any UI change. GIFs are most welcome!

[snyk-io]

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status	Scanner	Critical	High	Medium	Low	Total (0)
✅	Licenses	0	0	0	0	0 issues
✅	Code Security	0	0	0	0	0 issues
✅	Open Source Security	0	0	0	0	0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @jeffsnyk, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on a small but important refinement to the project's documentation. By fixing a grammatical error, it ensures that the instructions for applying Snyk rules are clear and professional, contributing to better understanding and adherence to security scanning guidelines.

Highlights

• Documentation Correction: A minor typo has been corrected in the snyk_rules_smart_apply.md file, changing 'shoule' to 'should' for improved readability and accuracy.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes a typo in the snyk_rules_smart_apply.md documentation file. The change is valid. I have added one suggestion on the modified line to further improve the document's formatting and consistency. Otherwise, the change looks good.

[gemini-code-assist]

Thanks for fixing the typo. To further improve this line for clarity and consistency, I have a couple of suggestions:

1. Improve Structure: This line is a clarification for the preceding point. Indenting it will render it as a sub-bullet, which improves the document's structure and makes the relationship between the points clearer.
2. Improve Consistency: The term 'coding language' is a bit redundant. For consistency with other documentation (e.g., snyk_rules_always_apply.md), this could be simplified to 'a Snyk-supported language'.

My code suggestion below incorporates both of these improvements.

Suggested change

	- This should only apply for Snyk-supported coding language
	- This should only apply for a Snyk-supported language