Skip to content

chore: move opsutils back to legacy folder#106

Merged
ecPablo merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
ecpablo/move-opsutils-legacy
Jun 26, 2026
Merged

chore: move opsutils back to legacy folder#106
ecPablo merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
ecpablo/move-opsutils-legacy

Conversation

@ecPablo

@ecPablo ecPablo commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

opsutils.go is only used by legacy code. The only usages in non-legacy mcms is currentlly in grant-roles pkg, which will be refactored in this PR #104

@ecPablo ecPablo marked this pull request as ready for review June 26, 2026 04:05
@ecPablo ecPablo requested a review from a team as a code owner June 26, 2026 04:05
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Release impact (release-please)

Current version 0.7.1 (on main)
After merge no version bump (no release)

PR title: chore: move opsutils back to legacy folder

This title will not trigger a semver bump when squash-merged to main. Use feat: for a minor release, or fix: / perf: / revert: for a patch release.

Conventional commit → bump

Intent PR title prefix Bump
Bug fix fix: patch
New feature feat: minor
Breaking change feat!: / fix!: or BREAKING CHANGE: / BREAKING-CHANGE: in description major
No release chore:, docs:, ci:, refactor:, etc. none

Update the PR title before merge if you need a different bump (squash commit message = PR title).

Preview is based on this PR title only. The release-please release PR may include other unreleased commits already on main.

@ecPablo ecPablo requested a review from graham-chainlink June 26, 2026 04:06
@cl-sonarqube-production

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ecPablo ecPablo requested a review from graham-chainlink June 26, 2026 04:33
@ecPablo ecPablo merged commit 2da6931 into main Jun 26, 2026
17 checks passed
@ecPablo ecPablo deleted the ecpablo/move-opsutils-legacy branch June 26, 2026 04:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants