docs(research): server edition demand research and recommendation (2026-09-14) - #1281
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Deploying mcpproxy-docs with
|
| Latest commit: |
b0ad62a
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://6f93d6a0.mcpproxy-docs.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://claude-server-edition-resear.mcpproxy-docs.pages.dev |
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
…26-09-14) Four-lane deep research (HN/Reddit, GitHub competitors + own issues, web/vendor landscape, code inventory + telemetry) on what teams need from a self-hosted MCP gateway, what the server edition ships today, and which candidate features (Vault, Helm, log exporters, Docker image) are worth building. Recommendation: posture (a) — personal edition first-class in a container — plus a bounded slice of the security wedge: generic OIDC, IdP-group → server allowlist, attributable JSONL audit; freeze the unreachable multiuser router / workspace / token-exchange code until a real user asks.
Dumbris
force-pushed
the
claude/server-edition-research-993367
branch
from
September 16, 2026 07:45
c80ff0c to
b0ad62a
Compare
Contributor
📦 Build ArtifactsWorkflow Run: View Run Available Artifacts
How to DownloadOption 1: GitHub Web UI (easiest)
Option 2: GitHub CLI gh run download 35070215180 --repo smart-mcp-proxy/mcpproxy-go
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Four-lane deep research on what teams actually need from a self-hosted MCP gateway, what the server edition ships today, and which candidate features (Vault, Helm, log exporters, Docker image) are worth a solo maintainer's time.
docs/research/server-edition-2026-09-14/README.md— report + recommendationevidence/— HN/Reddit (65 signals), GitHub competitors + own issues (33 repos), web/vendor landscape (24 vendors, pricing), code inventory + D1 telemetryRecommendation adopted: posture (a) — the personal edition, first-class when run headless in a container — plus a bounded slice of the security wedge: generic OIDC, IdP-group → server allowlist, attributable JSONL audit line; freeze the unreachable multiuser router / workspace / token-exchange code until a real user asks. Implementation follows as Spec 107.
Docs-only; no code changes.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code