improve uni-cli skill description + fix validation#1
Open
fernandezbaptiste wants to merge 1 commit intoshockz09:mainfrom
Open
improve uni-cli skill description + fix validation#1fernandezbaptiste wants to merge 1 commit intoshockz09:mainfrom
fernandezbaptiste wants to merge 1 commit intoshockz09:mainfrom
Conversation
- rewrite description with service names + trigger terms - fix allowed-tools format + remove XML tags - add verification workflow section
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
hey @shockz09, thanks for building uni-cli. really like the "one CLI to rule them all" concept + the smart insight about reducing token overhead for AI agents. kudos for the repo! just starred it.
ran your uni-cli skill through some evals and noticed a few things that were pretty quick to improve (moving from
~17%to~91%agent performance):these were easy changes to bring the skill in line with what performs well against Anthropic's best practices. honest disclosure, I work at tessl.io where we build tooling around this. not a pitch, just fixes that were straightforward to make.
you've got
1skill, if you want to do it yourself, spin up Claude Code and runtessl skill review. alternatively, let me know if you'd like an automatic review in your repo via GitHub Actions. it doesn't require signup, and this means you and your contributors get an instant quality signal before you have to review yourself.