Add organization community health defaults#13
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 37 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
WalkthroughThis change establishes repository-wide community and governance defaults: a validation script, agent and contributor guidance, security and conduct policies, support documentation, GitHub issue and pull request templates, Dependabot configuration, and profile collaboration information. ChangesCommunity governance baseline
Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~20 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Greptile SummaryThis PR adds organization-wide collaboration and repository-maintenance defaults. The main changes are:
Confidence Score: 5/5The policy and template changes look mergeable after tightening the local validation command.
.agents/bin/validate Important Files Changed
Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "Add organization community health defaul..." | Re-trigger Greptile |
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml (1)
1-1: 🔒 Security & Privacy | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick winDisable public blank issue creation for security intake.
blank_issues_enabled: trueexposes the blank issue option to repository users, allowing vulnerability reports or other security-related information to bypass thebug_report.ymlacknowledgement and any guided intake flow. Set it tofalseand keep the securitycontact_linkfor researchers to use private security reporting.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In @.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml at line 1, Update the blank_issues_enabled setting in the issue template configuration to false, while preserving the existing security contact_link so researchers continue using the private reporting flow.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In @.agents/bin/validate:
- Around line 4-8: Update the YAML validation command in .agents/bin/validate to
call YAML.safe_load_file with aliases enabled, while retaining safe loading.
This must allow anchors and aliases in repository-controlled GitHub Actions YAML
so validation can proceed to actionlint.
---
Nitpick comments:
In @.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml:
- Line 1: Update the blank_issues_enabled setting in the issue template
configuration to false, while preserving the existing security contact_link so
researchers continue using the private reporting flow.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: c147a3bb-c15c-42ba-b297-f6fa80d31505
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
.agents/bin/validate.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md.github/dependabot.ymlAGENTS.mdAGENT_WORKFLOW_TEMPLATE.mdCLAUDE.mdCODE_OF_CONDUCT.mdCONTRIBUTING.mdOPEN_SOURCE_MAINTENANCE.mdSECURITY.mdSUPPORT.mdprofile/README.md
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 918649ba62
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 8848aaec8b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 889c2d8619
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 34021c48d5
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| #!/bin/sh | ||
| set -eu | ||
|
|
||
| root="$(CDPATH= cd -- "$(dirname -- "$0")/../.." && pwd)" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
On macOS and other BSD userlands, dirname does not accept GNU's -- end-of-options marker, so this root calculation exits with a usage error before setup can install the validator; the identical expression in .agents/bin/validate prevents validation too. These are organization-default contributor commands, so use a POSIX-compatible dirname "$0" invocation (with any needed path handling) instead.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L10-L15
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Summary
AGENTS.mdworkflow templateMaintainer intent
The defaults make contribution quality and maintenance cost explicit without discouraging useful outside work. Repository-specific files continue to take precedence, so mature projects such as React on Rails and Shakapacker keep their more detailed support/security/version policies.
The maintenance baseline treats inactivity as a review signal only:
Nothing here automates archival, deletion, branch renaming, or repository settings.
Validation
.agents/bin/validateactionlint .github/workflows/*.ymlgit diff --checkandgit diff --cached --checkcodex review --uncommitted— clean after fixing staged/untracked whitespace coverageWorkflow and security audit
.github/dependabot.ymlrequests monthly GitHub Actions update pull requestscontact@shakacode.comas a fallback that asks reporters to withhold exploit details until a private channel is arrangedReview receipt
origin/mainatb4ec96692e7044codex review --uncommittedSummary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Community
Chores