Skip to content

CLDSRV-941: Bump arsenal for sproxyd chordCos=0#6214

Merged
bert-e merged 2 commits into
development/9.3from
improvement/CLDSRV-941-arsenal-sproxydclient
Jul 4, 2026
Merged

CLDSRV-941: Bump arsenal for sproxyd chordCos=0#6214
bert-e merged 2 commits into
development/9.3from
improvement/CLDSRV-941-arsenal-sproxydclient

Conversation

@BourgoisMickael

@BourgoisMickael BourgoisMickael commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

For S3C 9.5.3

branch dev/9.4 does not introduce these change, it will have it with the next release and bump of arsenal (S3C doesn't use branch dev/9.4 for now)

@bert-e

bert-e commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hello bourgoismickael,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

❌ 1 Tests Failed:

Tests completed Failed Passed Skipped
8489 1 8488 0
View the full list of 1 ❄️ flaky test(s)
"after each" hook for "should fail if trying to overwrite a delete marker"::MPU with x-scal-s3-version-id header With v4 signature "after each" hook for "should fail if trying to overwrite a delete marker"

Flake rate in main: 100.00% (Passed 0 times, Failed 174 times)

Stack Traces | 0.014s run time
We encountered an internal error. Please try again.

To view more test analytics, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard
📋 Got 3 mins? Take this short survey to help us improve Test Analytics.

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jul 1, 2026
@BourgoisMickael BourgoisMickael requested review from a team, anurag4DSB, borisfaure, leif-scality and tcarmet and removed request for a team July 1, 2026 15:31
@bert-e

bert-e commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.

@BourgoisMickael

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/create_integration_branches

@BourgoisMickael BourgoisMickael force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-941-arsenal-sproxydclient branch from 20c4731 to 099d513 Compare July 2, 2026 17:34
@BourgoisMickael BourgoisMickael force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-941-arsenal-sproxydclient branch from 099d513 to 055ae1b Compare July 3, 2026 16:20
@BourgoisMickael

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@bert-e reset

@bert-e

bert-e commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reset complete

I have successfully deleted this pull request's integration branches.

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@bert-e

bert-e commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@BourgoisMickael

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/approve

@bert-e

bert-e commented Jul 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Build failed

The build for commit did not succeed in branch w/9.4/improvement/CLDSRV-941-arsenal-sproxydclient

The following options are set: approve, create_integration_branches

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jul 4, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jul 4, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jul 4, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jul 4, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jul 4, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jul 4, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jul 4, 2026
@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Jul 4, 2026
@bert-e

bert-e commented Jul 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/9.3

  • ✔️ development/9.4

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0
  • development/9.1
  • development/9.2

This pull request did not target the following hotfix branch(es) so they
were left untouched:

  • hotfix/7.10.49
  • hotfix/7.10.27
  • hotfix/7.4.5
  • hotfix/7.4.9
  • hotfix/7.4.0
  • hotfix/6.4.7
  • hotfix/7.10.8
  • hotfix/7.2.0
  • hotfix/7.4.10
  • hotfix/7.4.6
  • hotfix/8.8.45
  • hotfix/7.10.1
  • hotfix/7.4.3
  • hotfix/7.6.0
  • hotfix/9.0.7
  • hotfix/7.10.15
  • hotfix/7.7.0
  • hotfix/7.4.1
  • hotfix/9.2.24
  • hotfix/7.10.0
  • hotfix/7.4.7
  • hotfix/7.70.11
  • hotfix/7.70.21
  • hotfix/9.0.32
  • hotfix/7.4.8
  • hotfix/7.10.3
  • hotfix/9.2.36
  • hotfix/7.9.0
  • hotfix/7.70.45
  • hotfix/7.70.51
  • hotfix/7.10.28
  • hotfix/7.4.4
  • hotfix/7.10.2
  • hotfix/7.4.2
  • hotfix/7.8.0
  • hotfix/7.10.30
  • hotfix/7.70.73
  • hotfix/7.10.4

Please check the status of the associated issue CLDSRV-941.

Goodbye bourgoismickael.

The following options are set: approve, create_integration_branches

@bert-e bert-e merged commit 055ae1b into development/9.3 Jul 4, 2026
60 of 61 checks passed
@bert-e bert-e deleted the improvement/CLDSRV-941-arsenal-sproxydclient branch July 4, 2026 02:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants