Conversation
robertmhaas
force-pushed
the
pg_plan_advice
branch
5 times, most recently
from
3124131 to
30a9774
Compare
cost_tidrangescan() was setting the disabled_nodes value correctly, and then immediately resetting it to zero, due to poor code editing on my part. materialized_finished_plan correctly set matpath.parent to zero, but forgot to also set matpath.parallel_workers = 0, causing an access to uninitialized memory in cost_material. (This shouldn't result in any real problem, but it makes valgrind unhappy.) reparameterize_path was dereferencing a variable before verifying that it was not NULL. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> (issue #1) Reported-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> (issue #1) Diagnosed-by: Lukas Fittl <lukas@fittl.com> (issue #1) Reported-by: Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com> (issue #2) Reported-by: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> (issue #3) Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAN4CZFPvwjNJEZ_JT9Y67yR7C=KMNa=LNefOB8ZY7TKDcmAXOA@mail.gmail.com Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/aXrnPgrq6Gggb5TG@paquier.xyz
Suppose that we're currently planning a query and, when that same query was previously planned and executed, we learned something about how a certain table within that query should be planned. We want to take note when that same table is being planned during the current planning cycle, but this is difficult to do, because the RTI of the table from the previous plan won't necessarily be equal to the RTI that we see during the current planning cycle. This is because each subquery has a separate range table during planning, but these are flattened into one range table when constructing the final plan, changing RTIs. Commit 8c49a48 allows us to match up subqueries seen in the previous planning cycles with the subqueries currently being planned just by comparing textual names, but that's not quite enough to let us deduce anything about individual tables, because we don't know where each subquery's range table appears in the final, flattened range table. To fix that, store a list of SubPlanRTInfo objects in the final planned statement, each including the name of the subplan, the offset at which it begins in the flattened range table, and whether or not it was a dummy subplan -- if it was, some RTIs may have been dropped from the final range table, but also there's no need to control how a dummy subquery gets planned. The toplevel subquery has no name and always begins at rtoffset 0, so we make no entry for it. This commit teaches pg_overexplain's RANGE_TABLE option to make use of this new data to display the subquery name for each range table entry. Reviewed-by: Lukas Fittl <lukas@fittl.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Burd <greg@burd.me> Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Haibo Yan <tristan.yim@gmail.com> Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZ-Jh1T6QyWoCODMVQdhTUPYkaZjWztzP1En4=ZHoKPzw@mail.gmail.com
An extension (or core code) might want to reconstruct the planner's choice of join order from the final plan. To do so, it must be possible to find all of the RTIs that were part of the join problem in that plan. The previous commit, together with the earlier work in 8c49a48, is enough to let us match up RTIs we see in the final plan with RTIs that we see during the planning cycle, but we still have a problem if the planner decides to drop some RTIs out of the final plan altogether. To fix that, when setrefs.c removes a SubqueryScan, single-child Append, or single-child MergeAppend from the final Plan tree, record the type of the removed node and the RTIs that the removed node would have scanned in the final plan tree. It would be natural to record this information on the child of the removed plan node, but that would require adding an additional pointer field to type Plan, which seems undesirable. So, instead, store the information in a separate list that the executor need never consult, and use the plan_node_id to identify the plan node with which the removed node is logically associated. Also, update pg_overexplain to display these details. Reviewed-by: Lukas Fittl <lukas@fittl.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Burd <greg@burd.me> Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Haibo Yan <tristan.yim@gmail.com> Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZ-Jh1T6QyWoCODMVQdhTUPYkaZjWztzP1En4=ZHoKPzw@mail.gmail.com
An extension (or core code) might want to reconstruct the planner's decisions about whether and where to perform partitionwise joins from the final plan. To do so, it must be possible to find all of the RTIs of partitioned tables appearing in the plan. But when an AppendPath or MergeAppendPath pulls up child paths from a subordinate AppendPath or MergeAppendPath, the RTIs of the subordinate path do not appear in the final plan, making this kind of reconstruction impossible. To avoid this, propagate the RTI sets that would have been present in the 'apprelids' field of the subordinate Append or MergeAppend nodes that would have been created into the surviving Append or MergeAppend node, using a new 'child_append_relid_sets' field for that purpose. The value of this field is a list of Bitmapsets, because each relation whose append-list was pulled up had its own set of RTIs: just one, if it was a partitionwise scan, or more than one, if it was a partitionwise join. Since our goal is to see where partitionwise joins were done, it is essential to avoid losing the information about how the RTIs were grouped in the pulled-up relations. This commit also updates pg_overexplain so that EXPLAIN (RANGE_TABLE) will display the saved RTI sets. Co-authored-by: Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org> Co-authored-by: Lukas Fittl <lukas@fittl.com> Reviewed-by: Lukas Fittl <lukas@fittl.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Burd <greg@burd.me> Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Haibo Yan <tristan.yim@gmail.com> Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZ-Jh1T6QyWoCODMVQdhTUPYkaZjWztzP1En4=ZHoKPzw@mail.gmail.com
Provide a facility that (1) can be used to stabilize certain plan choices so that the planner cannot reverse course without authorization and (2) can be used by knowledgeable users to insist on plan choices contrary to what the planner believes best. In both cases, terrible outcomes are possible: users should think twice and perhaps three times before constraining the planner's ability to do as it thinks best; nevertheless, there are problems that are much more easily solved with these facilities than without them. This patch takes the approach of analyzing a finished plan to produce textual output, which we call "plan advice", that describes key decisions made during plan; if that plan advice is provided during future planning cycles, it will force those key decisions to be made in the same way. Not all planner decisions can be controlled using advice; for example, decisions about how to perform aggregation are currently out of scope, as is choice of sort order. Plan advice can also be edited by the user, or even written from scratch in simple cases, making it possible to generate outcomes that the planner would not have produced. Partial advice can be provided to control some planner outcomes but not others. Currently, plan advice is focused only on specific outcomes, such as the choice to use a sequential scan for a particular relation, and not on estimates that might contribute to those outcomes, such as a possibly-incorrect selectivity estimate. While it would be useful to users to be able to provide plan advice that affects selectivity estimates or other aspects of costing, that is out of scope for this commit. For more details, see contrib/pg_plan_advice/README or the SGML documentation. NOTE: There are still some known problems with this code, which are called out by XXX. Reviewed-by: Lukas Fittl <lukas@fittl.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Burd <greg@burd.me> Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: Haibo Yan <tristan.yim@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Dian Fay <di@nmfay.com> Reviewed-by: Ajay Pal <ajay.pal.k@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZ-Jh1T6QyWoCODMVQdhTUPYkaZjWztzP1En4=ZHoKPzw@mail.gmail.com
Commit 94f3ad3 failed to do this because I couldn't think of a use for the information, but this has proven to be short-sighted. Best to fix it before this code is officially released. Now, the only argument to standard_planenr that isn't passed to planner_setup_hook is boundParams, but that is accessible via glob->boundParams, and so doesn't need to be passed separately.
robertmhaas
force-pushed
the
pg_plan_advice
branch
from
30a9774 to
c930d75
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Mandatory description