Skip to content

fix: pin Review 2.8.0 with package-mode compatibility - #373

Merged
firejune merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
jinni/372-card-372
Nov 9, 2026
Merged

firejune merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
jinni/372-card-372

Conversation

@firejune

@firejune firejune commented Nov 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pin Review exactly to 2.8.0, preserving Parts 2.36.0/Core 3.6.0 and Create's package-only live-host behavior. The new host-port union needs only a schema-discriminant narrowing in the parts-act test helper; no product runtime source changes are included.

Closes #372. Enables the future #278/#317/#356 consumers, which remain parked behind the pilot's step-1 owner act; this PR does not activate API@3/act@4 or reopen ingestion. This in-flight dependency pin is explicitly allowed under HQ's manual-release transition. Exact-head HQ dependency sign is required before merge.

Validation: final focused publication 27 pass, compatibility 3 pass and parts-act 19 pass; typecheck/lint exit 0, with initial typecheck and obsolete Review #555 gate failures preserved. The replacement gate test verifies completed scene-answer/diagnostic carriage and rejects invalid editable options by name. Earlier focused refresh/close/signoff/act/handoff suites pass, and the filled example retains zero refusals/warnings.

A synthetic host opened with Review 2.7.1 accepts the 2.8.0 CLI's ingestion, empty/pending reconciliation and close (exit 0); foreground host readiness is distinct from process exit. No reuse mismatch occurred. All hosts are synthetic; cleanup is verified separately. No live pilot or host action.

Nova generator checks and 32 direction hashes reproduced with installed Review 2.8.0 (run 20261109T132959Z-2100dea87ea7458e89ca498d7f76b9a3, exit 0, 6.55 seconds, quiescent boundary). Its recorded timeout is 3,600 seconds rather than the requested 600-second cap; that historical deviation is retained without a duplicate run. Full acceptance is PR CI. Producer template bytes and question-set identities stay unchanged.

Co-Authored-By: Jinni <342598851+fj-jinni[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Naru <342599188+fj-naru[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 9, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-09T13:42:21.022162Z 851ca73 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@firejune

firejune commented Nov 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

HQ SIGN at 851ca73 (dependency). Verified: head is clean with check success; the diff is package.json, bun.lock, docs and tests only, with no src/ change; the lockfile integrity for @rig-c/review@2.8.0 equals npm's (sha512-lA+iTx…lMXA==). Merge with --match-head-commit at this head.

@firejune
firejune merged commit 6cad984 into main Nov 9, 2026
1 check passed
@firejune
firejune deleted the jinni/372-card-372 branch November 9, 2026 13:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Pin Review 2.8.0 and preserve package-mode type boundaries

1 participant