[tridev-tej]

guest article for #1467

• models pending, completed, rejected and unresolved calls with variants
• includes a runnable mock for stale replies and late results
• adds author metadata and the generated route

kept as a draft for editorial feedback

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review	Status	Commit	Review trigger
📝 Code Review	✅ Completed 2026-10-26T20:06:12.950972Z	2844998	Draft marked ready

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

[tridev-tej]

hi @fhammerschmidt, could you review the guest article when you get a chance?

[fhammerschmidt]

Thanks for the draft. I think it needs a more focused revision before it fits the blog:

1. Tell the reader what led to this pattern and why it's cool without too many words.
2. Don't put all the source code of the whole project in there. Just what's important, which should mostly be ReScript code on the ReScript site.
3. You can use res example in a markdown code-block to get a codebox like this: it has a "Open in playground" button which can also execute code. Maybe you can tweak the example to fully run in the playground. It can even render React elements.
4. Please use the most current stable ReScript release 12.3.1, not because your code needs it, just a good habit.
5. AI slop prose detected. May I suggest you write it in your own words or dictate it instead (I recommend handy for that, a model that runs locally and is free: https://github.com/cjpais/Handy). This alone usually makes it more focused and shorter.

May I also know why you do this? Used ReScript for a longer time or just started?