Skip to content

chore: migrate to nfs - #5232

Draft
Zaperex wants to merge 4 commits into
redhat-developer:mainfrom
Zaperex:migrate-to-NFS
Draft

chore: migrate to nfs#5232
Zaperex wants to merge 4 commits into
redhat-developer:mainfrom
Zaperex:migrate-to-NFS

Conversation

@Zaperex

@Zaperex Zaperex commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Migrates statically installed OFS elements to the new frontend system

Which issue(s) does this PR fix

PR acceptance criteria

Please make sure that the following steps are complete:

  • GitHub Actions are completed and successful
  • Unit Tests are updated and passing
  • E2E Tests are updated and passing
  • Documentation is updated if necessary (requirement for new features)
  • Add a screenshot if the change is UX/UI related

How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer

Zaperex added 4 commits August 6, 2026 10:08
Assisted-By: Cursor
Signed-off-by: Frank Kong <frkong@redhat.com>

rh-pre-commit.version: 2.4.0
rh-pre-commit.check-secrets: ENABLED
Assisted-By: Cursor
Signed-off-by: Frank Kong <frkong@redhat.com>

rh-pre-commit.version: 2.4.0
rh-pre-commit.check-secrets: ENABLED
Assisted-By: Cursor
Signed-off-by: Frank Kong <frkong@redhat.com>

rh-pre-commit.version: 2.4.0
rh-pre-commit.check-secrets: ENABLED
Signed-off-by: Frank Kong <frkong@redhat.com>
Assisted-By: Cursor

rh-pre-commit.version: 2.4.0
rh-pre-commit.check-secrets: ENABLED
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
11.2% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 3%)
D Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)
C Security Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant