🧪 Add missing tests for loadSession parsing failure

[sunnylqm]

🎯 What: The testing gap addressed
Added a missing unit test for the loadSession function in src/api.ts to explicitly handle the edge case where the credential file exists but its contents fail to parse due to invalid JSON.

📊 Coverage: What scenarios are now tested
The new test file (tests/api.test.ts) guarantees that loadSession will securely catch and throw a parsing error (specifically a SyntaxError) and cleanly invoke console.error with instructions when encountering malformed .pushy or .cresc.temp session files.

✨ Result: The improvement in test coverage
The test utilizes bun:test's robust spyOn functionality to mock fs.existsSync and fs.readFileSync, completely eliminating reliance on the actual file system during tests and assuring other tests relying on fs remain undisturbed. This introduces isolated testing of this specific try/catch path, improving the stability and fault tolerance of session handling logic.

---

PR created automatically by Jules for task 17070589104881675075 started by @sunnylqm

[google-labs-jules]

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

---

For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@sunnylqm has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 26 minutes and 59 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 8e972784-9a35-4383-b322-7e1d2a58e982

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ae592d0 and 59225e9.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• bun.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• tests/api.test.ts

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch tests-api-loadsession-parse-failure-17070589104881675075

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}