Skip to content

RDK-60312: Log level modifications for curl communication logs#262

Open
yogeswaransky wants to merge 6 commits intodevelopfrom
topic/RDK-60312
Open

RDK-60312: Log level modifications for curl communication logs#262
yogeswaransky wants to merge 6 commits intodevelopfrom
topic/RDK-60312

Conversation

@yogeswaransky
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Yogeswaran K <yogeswaransky@gmail.com>
@yogeswaransky yogeswaransky requested a review from a team as a code owner February 13, 2026 08:17
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 13, 2026 08:17
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This pull request modifies log levels for curl communication logs in the telemetry component to reduce log verbosity. The changes downgrade several informational success messages from T2Info to T2Debug level while keeping error messages at T2Error level. Additionally, the PR includes comment refinements and clarifications throughout the HTTP connection pool implementation.

Changes:

  • Downgraded success log messages from T2Info to T2Debug in HTTP GET/POST operations
  • Updated and clarified comments throughout the connection pool implementation
  • Simplified log messages by removing redundant phrases like "using connection pool"

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 11 comments.

File Description
source/xconf-client/xconfclient.c Changed HTTP GET success log from T2Info to T2Debug; simplified error message
source/protocol/http/multicurlinterface.c Multiple log level adjustments, comment refinements, and clarifications for connection pool operations
source/protocol/http/curlinterface.c Changed HTTP POST success log from T2Info to T2Debug; simplified error message

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Signed-off-by: Yogeswaran K <yogeswaransky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yogeswaran K <yogeswaransky@gmail.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 13, 2026 11:32
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 16, 2026 14:48
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +106 to +107
// Check environment variable T2_CONNECTION_POOL_SIZE to have the size
// of the connection pool based on the device type
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 16, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comment style is inconsistent here. Line 106-107 has a multi-line comment using "// ... // ..." format which is uncommon. It would be more conventional to either use a single-line comment or a block comment with proper indentation. Consider rewording as a single line: "// Check environment variable T2_CONNECTION_POOL_SIZE for device-specific pool size"

Suggested change
// Check environment variable T2_CONNECTION_POOL_SIZE to have the size
// of the connection pool based on the device type
// Check environment variable T2_CONNECTION_POOL_SIZE for device-specific pool size

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Comments