Skip to content

Quarkus: Runtime and Framework for Cloud-Native Java - Blog post #2 #2441

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Quarkus: Runtime and Framework for Cloud-Native Java - Blog post #2 #2441

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+189 −0

Conversation

@MichalMaler
Copy link
Contributor

@MichalMaler MichalMaler commented Oct 22, 2025

A second blog post, the purpose of which is to showcase Quarkus' strengths from the two points of view:
One as a runtime, the second as a framework.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 22, 2025 •
edited
Loading

🎊 PR Preview 0db298b has been successfully built and deployed to https://quarkus-site-pr-2441-preview.surge.sh

  • Images of blog posts older than 3 months are not available.
  • Newsletters older than 3 months are not available.

@MichalMaler MichalMaler force-pushed the mickey-quarkus-blog-post-2 branch 2 times, most recently from 535a64e to 8925b58 Compare October 22, 2025 14:56
@MichalMaler MichalMaler changed the title Quarkus as a powerful runtime - Blog post #2 Quarkus: Runtime and Framework for Cloud-Native Java - Blog post #2 Oct 22, 2025
@Ladicek
Copy link
Contributor

Ladicek commented Oct 22, 2025

LGTM otherwise.

@MichalMaler MichalMaler requested a review from Ladicek October 22, 2025 15:48
jponge
jponge reviewed Oct 22, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@jponge jponge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not authoritative, but it looks good to me

gsmet
gsmet requested changes Oct 23, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@gsmet gsmet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I haven't read the post to be honest but I disagree with trying to tie us to some Google grand principles.
It's definitely not what was behind the inception of Quarkus.

@MichalMaler MichalMaler marked this pull request as draft October 23, 2025 16:23
@MichalMaler MichalMaler force-pushed the mickey-quarkus-blog-post-2 branch 2 times, most recently from 20bb765 to b07079a Compare October 23, 2025 17:07
@MichalMaler
Copy link
Contributor Author

MichalMaler commented Oct 23, 2025

@jherrman, May I request your language expert review? :)

@MichalMaler
Copy link
Contributor Author

MichalMaler commented Oct 23, 2025 •
edited
Loading

I haven't read the post to be honest but I disagree with trying to tie us to some Google grand principles. It's definitely not what was behind the inception of Quarkus.

@gsmet
I changed it to a neutral tone. Now I am not quoting Google or anything. Just pointing to an article I am using as a reference.

jherrman
jherrman reviewed Oct 24, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@jherrman jherrman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A nice write-up overall, but some parts would benefit from a slight rewrite, IMHO.

@MichalMaler MichalMaler force-pushed the mickey-quarkus-blog-post-2 branch 3 times, most recently from 12c7f07 to 947315f Compare October 27, 2025 16:35
@MichalMaler MichalMaler marked this pull request as ready for review October 27, 2025 16:36
@MichalMaler
Copy link
Contributor Author

MichalMaler commented Oct 27, 2025

@cescoffier Hello Clemenet!
May I request your review and hear your two cents on this? :)
Kind regards,
M.

cescoffier
cescoffier requested changes Oct 28, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@cescoffier cescoffier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great content. Need a bit more work to make it easier to read.

@MichalMaler MichalMaler force-pushed the mickey-quarkus-blog-post-2 branch from cc30338 to c58c10c Compare October 31, 2025 14:39
jherrman
jherrman reviewed Nov 4, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@jherrman jherrman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A couple more suggestions in terms of stylistics and grammar.

@MichalMaler MichalMaler force-pushed the mickey-quarkus-blog-post-2 branch from e79396d to 0020144 Compare November 4, 2025 14:05
sberyozkin
sberyozkin reviewed Nov 4, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@sberyozkin sberyozkin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@MichalMaler Thanks for simplifying the security section, much easier to read. We can expand it but given that this PR covers a very wide ground, IMHO the current security related overview is good to go

cescoffier
cescoffier requested changes Nov 4, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@cescoffier cescoffier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did a quick read , there are still a few issues.

It would be great to have someone doing a full read to find the transition issues.

@MichalMaler @jherrman
Quarkus as a powerful runtime - Blog post quarkusio#2
eeed2be 
Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Jiri Herrmann <jherrman@redhat.com>

Clement's review

Aplying Clemet's feedback VOL2; revamping of the Performance section

Signed-off-by: Michal Maléř <mmaler@redhat.com>

Co-authored-by: Jiri Herrmann <jherrman@redhat.com>
@MichalMaler MichalMaler force-pushed the mickey-quarkus-blog-post-2 branch from 0020144 to eeed2be Compare November 7, 2025 16:46
jmartisk
jmartisk approved these changes Nov 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@jmartisk jmartisk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's good now. Anybody have any more comments?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@sberyozkin sberyozkin sberyozkin left review comments

@cescoffier cescoffier cescoffier requested changes

@jmartisk jmartisk jmartisk approved these changes

@Ladicek Ladicek Awaiting requested review from Ladicek

@gsmet gsmet Awaiting requested review from gsmet

@jponge jponge Awaiting requested review from jponge

@jherrman jherrman Awaiting requested review from jherrman

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@MichalMaler @Ladicek @jponge @cescoffier @sberyozkin @jmartisk @gsmet @jherrman