Document boolean item access and comments - #597
Open
user01010111 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Explain why dictionary access returns a Python bool and show how to read and update boolean comments through
item(key)on documents and tables. The example preserves the boolean values and the untouched root comment.Fixes #119.
Validation: the example doctest, root/nested true/false round trips and all 1,052 tests pass. The strict Sphinx dirhtml build reports the same four pre-existing
register_encoderdocstring diagnostics on both revisions; the new section renders correctly.Agent Drafting Metadata