Skip to content

chore: untrack Python bytecode and label design tokens 3.3.0 - #181

Merged
altaywtf merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/verify-gate
Sep 27, 2026
Merged

altaywtf merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/verify-gate

Conversation

@altaywtf

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
  • Untracks scripts/__pycache__/phosphor_icons.cpython-313.pyc. .gitignore already ignores __pycache__/.
  • Changes the designVersion label from 3.2.1 to 3.3.0. The vendored design/tokens.dtcg.json has the same SHA-256 (a915906…c0c6) as dist/tokens.dtcg.json at putio-design v3.3.0, so no token values change. The label appears in the generated PutioDesignTokens.kt header, design/README.md, and the two codegen and scheme tests. The scheme test is renamed to tokensMatchDesign330; its assertions are unchanged.

The gate stays ./gradlew verify :buildSrc:test. In Gradle 9.7.1 the root verify task can't depend on buildSrc tasks (Included build 'buildSrc' not found in build ':'); #180 tracks moving buildSrc to an included build.

./gradlew verify :buildSrc:test passed locally before and after the change, with putio-sdk-kotlin at b9c6d94. After the change, generateDesignTokens re-ran and wrote the 3.3.0 header.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-27T19:23:02.834233Z 9795fa9 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@altaywtf
altaywtf merged commit bb9861c into main Sep 27, 2026
1 check passed
@altaywtf
altaywtf deleted the chore/verify-gate branch September 27, 2026 19:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant