[ptr727]

Summary

The second resync pull request for #540, for the config, workflow, and README drift classes the hub audit reported (audit run 2026-10-26T15:06:59Z | hub 5344d82). It follows #548, which carried the rules these changes apply.

• .markdownlint-cli2.jsonc re-vendored from the hub. The file is verbatim fidelity, and the hub split its comments into one sentence per line. That is the comment-added finding this pull request's comments label answers.
• publish-release.yml concurrency uses the ref-scoped group ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }} that WORKFLOW.md D7.1 pins. The workflow is dispatch-only, so no github.run_id suffix applies.
• Concurrency comments on the merge bot, the publisher, and the deploy workflow cite their GOVERNANCE.md "Workflow YAML Conventions" exception by number rather than restating it, as that section requires.
• README.md: the pre-release shield carries filter=*-g* per the hub's spec/readme-structure.md, so it shows the newest pre-release rather than the newest release. The <!-- Repo --> reference group is sorted by reference name.

Local Review

Two local strict review passes on the frontier tier, each recorded. The first found that the cited rules were not yet carried, which merging #548 and then develop into this branch resolves.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[coderabbitai]

Important

• 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: Organization UI
• Review profile: ASSERTIVE
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 34a0f67f-af31-4ef7-901b-acee6743ecbd

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[ptr727]

A recorded local strict-review pass covers head ac0dc05267137846d90a226722fe5acfc67ceee7, the content this pull request carries at that commit against develop, and it recorded 0 findings.

[Copilot]

🟢 Approval recommended

No unresolved review findings were identified, and all reviewed files align with the stated repository conventions.

No open issues 🎉

What changed in this PR

This pull request resynchronizes Markdown configuration, workflow concurrency behavior, and README shield and reference metadata with repository conventions.

Changes:

• Updates the shared Markdown lint configuration comments.
• Applies required publisher concurrency scoping and documents approved workflow exceptions.
• Filters the README pre-release shield and alphabetizes repository references.

File	Description
README.md	Updates the pre-release shield filter and sorts repository references.
.markdownlint-cli2.jsonc	Carries the updated shared Markdown lint configuration comments.
.github/​workflows/​publish-release.yml	Uses the required ref-scoped publisher concurrency group.
.github/​workflows/​merge-bot-pull-request.yml	Documents the PR-number concurrency exception.
.github/​workflows/​deploy-site.yml	Documents the environment-scoped deployment concurrency exception.

_{Review effort: Lite}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (develop@14378bf). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             develop     #551   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage           ?   53.98%           
==========================================
  Files              ?       12           
  Lines              ?     3412           
  Branches           ?        0           
==========================================
  Hits               ?     1842           
  Misses             ?     1570           
  Partials           ?        0           

Flag	Coverage Δ
python-3.13	53.98% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.