[Spec 250] t3code is the front end: nested Workspace > Architect > Builders, porch gates, and approval from t3code - #266

Merged

pseudoseed merged 177 commits into

mainfrom

builder/spir-250

Aug 31, 2026

Commits on Aug 30, 2026

chore(porch): 250 init spir
pseudoseed
committed
70696bd
chore(porch): 250 skip pre-approved plan
pseudoseed
committed
4783b99
[Spec 250] Initial implementation plan

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
2882b2e
chore(porch): 250 plan build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
2ab7c89
[Spec 250] thread: plan-phase verification notes

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
da20333
[Spec 250] thread: opencode lane permission fix

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
985736c
[Spec 250] Plan with multi-agent review

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
6c1d5d8
[Spec 250] Plan: ground the schema guard in upstream's own idiom

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
8d25ac8
[Spec 250] Plan with codex review and architect ruling

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
245296d
[Spec 250] Plan: move the browser harness out of the fork

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
abf5f3d
[Spec 250] Plan: record the porch-level opencode lane case

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
987c5a4
[Spec 250] Plan: correct the sidebar grouping relationship and pre-check the closure

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
841f26b
[Spec 250] thread: correct the opencode lane diagnosis

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
f5073c8
[Spec 250] Plan: drop the stale connect-src claim from phase 10's objective

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
4ebfd09
[Spec 250] Plan with opencode review

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
46285ad
[Spec 250] Plan review round 1 rebuttals

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
002023b
chore(porch): 250 plan-approval gate-requested
pseudoseed
committed
5caca05
chore(porch): 250 plan-approval gate-request-updated
pseudoseed
committed
0851c4f
[Spec 250] thread: plan-approval gate reached

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
209562a
[Spec 250] Plan: private repo, never a GitHub fork

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
080f791
chore(porch): 250 plan-approval gate-approved
pseudoseed
committed
743fc7e
chore(porch): 250 implement phase-transition
pseudoseed
committed
28dd339
[Spec 250] thread: record the per-phase visibility rule before context refresh

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
0cd37c4
chore(porch): 250 acknowledge context refresh
pseudoseed
committed
c08e5d3
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_1] feat: two-identity vendoring harness

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
82af955
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
49b0fb6
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_1] docs: name the one deliberate identity exception

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
ea82d21
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_1] fix: per-identity verify verbs, and a swallowed git status

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
f055369
chore(porch): 250 implement re-iter (iter 2)
pseudoseed
committed
beb7fb4
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
417721d
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_1] fix: guard the ref --since actually names

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
f2aebb6
chore(porch): 250 advance plan phase → phase_2
pseudoseed
committed
9ef53fb
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_1] feat: ahead of the contract is not the wrong commit

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
7bae1cc
chore(porch): 250 acknowledge context refresh
pseudoseed
committed
b8f8c1a
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_2] feat: fork hierarchy commit, and two bugs it exposed

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
19341a6
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
0349e28
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_2] docs: review, lesson, and phase 5's named input

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
6005a9c
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_2] test: exercise criterion 8b instead of arguing it

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
505f657
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_2] docs: rebuttals, and why start --keep-data had to exist

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
543352e
chore(porch): 250 implement re-iter (iter 2)
pseudoseed
committed
22cd0fd
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
6ed7752
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_2] test: name the fork commit the 8b evidence describes

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
fb897de
chore(porch): 250 advance plan phase → phase_3
pseudoseed
committed
57a05a1
chore(porch): 250 acknowledge context refresh
pseudoseed
committed
d063aae
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_3] fix: a crashed 8b run must not destroy passing evidence

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
ffdf47d
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
f6f6581
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_3] docs: rebuttals and the engine-collapse finding

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
be41c10
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_3] chore: log the engine-fix commit, refresh 8b evidence

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
33bb421
[Spec 250] docs: promote "a test that cannot fail is not a test" to the hot tier

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
2dad99c
chore(porch): 250 implement re-iter (iter 2)
pseudoseed
committed
5be4a5e
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
837bfe6
[Spec 250] docs: keep the stuck-trigger always-on, folded into slot 1

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
cfad6da
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_3] docs: make the ws/RPC hop a phase 6 acceptance item

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
71e5a7d
chore(porch): 250 advance plan phase → phase_4
pseudoseed
committed
22c5260
chore(porch): 250 acknowledge context refresh
pseudoseed
committed
1b1ff58

Commits on Aug 31, 2026

[Spec 250][Phase: phase_4] fix: derive the 8b column set instead of hardcoding it

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
6a88f87
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
d91f445
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_4] docs: rebuttals, and the third occurrence of one mistake

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
56c95e8
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_4] docs: correct a workaround I got wrong

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
e226d4b
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_4] docs: the four costumes, as one list for phase 6

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
3b566c9
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_4] chore: refresh 8b evidence for the exhaustiveness commit

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
85fa148
chore(porch): 250 implement re-iter (iter 2)
pseudoseed
committed
c825852
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
3cc8b78
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_4] docs: widen slot 8 to the rule the four costumes produced

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
6b8b301
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_4] docs: costume five, one commit after the table

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
cc35433
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_4] chore: refresh 8b evidence for the provisioning commit

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
23542cf
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_4] docs: promote the antidote above the five costumes

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
5b35d3d
chore(porch): 250 implement re-iter (iter 3)
pseudoseed
committed
049638a
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_4] docs: amend the plan so it agrees with the code

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
b7a334e
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
1dbbf0d
chore(porch): 250 advance plan phase → phase_5
pseudoseed
committed
9f866df
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_4] docs: iteration 3 reviews, both lanes APPROVE
pseudoseed
committed
3e0ee68
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_4] docs: thread log for iteration 3
pseudoseed
committed
80a87dc
chore(porch): 250 acknowledge context refresh
pseudoseed
committed
4b4008e
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_5] feat: regenerate the vendored contract from the fork

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
9ce83d4
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_5] fix: shapeCheck threw on the payload it was vendored to check

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
f7c1515
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_5] fix: the evidence collectors recorded a fork sha for an upstream run

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
76ff7b5
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_5] test: the decided union verdict, the flip, and the reopened gate

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
4146e4d
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_5] docs: phase 5 review, plan amendment, thread log

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
8394d97
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
6b5a606
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_5] fix: the shipped module attributed a fork commit to upstream

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
44989ad
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_5] docs: iteration 1 rebuttals and review

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
d53ca56
chore(porch): 250 implement re-iter (iter 2)
pseudoseed
committed
ff18fd8
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
8d1289a
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_5] test: drop the extension filter, both lanes APPROVE

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
1a69f7b
chore(porch): 250 advance plan phase → phase_6
pseudoseed
committed
3e4d2c6
chore(porch): 250 acknowledge context refresh
pseudoseed
committed
eba5f59
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_6] feat: porch-driver names the role and the parent

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
9ff5c9b
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_6] feat: resolve the spawning architect as the builder's parent

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
f1fd980
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_6] feat: publish porch gate state onto the thread

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
f80da1b
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_6] test: the refusal discriminant, over a real socket

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
abbedee
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_6] chore: regenerate the contract from the fork's new head

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
aa2d82a
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_6] docs: phase 6 review and thread log

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
7ef165e
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
53279e8
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_6] fix: a reconnect leaked the gate watch it replaced

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
25f46ef
chore(porch): 250 implement re-iter (iter 2)
pseudoseed
committed
18d48eb
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_6] test: hash the wire evidence's sources instead of dating them

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
9e94e7b
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
7f61768
chore(porch): 250 advance plan phase → phase_7
pseudoseed
committed
350bd61
chore(porch): 250 acknowledge context refresh
pseudoseed
committed
86561e6
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_7] test: drive the fork's real sidebar in a browser, and pin the contract to it

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
28140ca
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
531181b
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_7] fix: act on the 3-way review — both lanes APPROVE, four non-blocking notes

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
8de01c4
chore(porch): 250 advance plan phase → phase_8
pseudoseed
committed
e787d6b
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_7] docs: record the appearance approval and the count-treatment finding

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
924efa7
chore(porch): 250 acknowledge context refresh
pseudoseed
committed
0475e81
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_8] test: drive the gate through the credential that writes gates

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
0b5031a
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
5483c4b
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_8] chore: stop exporting screenshots as base64 into the review patches

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
b77fa03
chore(porch): 250 advance plan phase → phase_9
pseudoseed
committed
692f3f5
chore(porch): 250 acknowledge context refresh
pseudoseed
committed
0333ad0
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_9] test: measure the tiling in a browser, and amend the plan with criterion 4b

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
4be6072
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
c0b3659
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_9] test: reach the grid the way a user reaches it

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
3302bc2
chore(porch): 250 advance plan phase → phase_10
pseudoseed
committed
aece38c
chore(porch): 250 acknowledge context refresh
pseudoseed
committed
e945483
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_10] test: drive the real proxy, and watch what the page asks for
pseudo
committed
012b871
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
dcce077
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_10] docs: the phase 10 review, and the rebase surface measured
pseudo
committed
7b9acc9
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_10] test: the proxy's body bound, asserted at the route
pseudo
committed
4b1ed3f
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_10] fix: act on the 3-way review — a test that reported a pass on a run that never happened
pseudo
committed
d3f031a
chore(porch): 250 implement re-iter (iter 2)
pseudoseed
committed
cd00d5b
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_10] docs: the review outcome in the builder thread
pseudo
committed
a3c6ac5
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_10] docs: the phase 11 rulings, and the iPad runbook
pseudo
committed
6b685e9
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
059ca41
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_10] fix: the runbook named two variables that do not exist
pseudo
committed
1fc70a4
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_10] docs: the runbook's tokens expire in 10 minutes by default
pseudo
committed
8d26d21
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_10] fix: the runbook sent the human to the test harness, and hand-rolled a mode t3code already has
pseudo
committed
7a44d26
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_10] docs: every deliverable mapped to the test that holds it up
pseudo
committed
e6e50a6
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_10] docs: the runbook made the human transcribe a token t3code will hand them as a link
pseudo
committed
4407754
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_10] docs: the runbook's step numbers pointed at the wrong token
pseudo
committed
ecf5d39
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_10] fix: the same-origin assertion was a prefix match, and could not fail on ten ports
pseudo
committed
9764e17
chore(porch): 250 advance plan phase → phase_11
pseudoseed
committed
78123af
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_10] docs: phase 10 closed, and the two review lessons
pseudo
committed
01a9054
chore(porch): 250 acknowledge context refresh
pseudoseed
committed
becc626
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] feat: the rebase drill, as a procedure that measures rather than an event that happened
pseudo
committed
04e5074
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] fix: the frozen fallback's suite went red at phase 5 and nothing local runs it
pseudo
committed
8a67894
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] fix: a timeout that was a wrong budget, not a flaky test
pseudo
committed
bb9bedf
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] docs: the regression numbers, with the reason each red thing is red
pseudo
committed
c22fdc2
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] feat: the acceptance evidence's numbers come from the runs, not from typing
pseudo
committed
6380dd4
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] docs: phase 11 in the builder thread
pseudo
committed
d7c3e4d
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] docs: phase 11 adds no fork commit, and that is not an omission
pseudo
committed
e851894
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
36e1624
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] fix: the zero-movement path dropped the watermark field silently
pseudo
committed
1e5b8bb
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] docs: the phase 10 iteration 2 consult context was left untracked

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
ebc3d57
chore(porch): 250 implement re-iter (iter 2)
pseudoseed
committed
e50b8fe
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] fix: the drill's `ok` claimed a shape-check that never ran

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
00524fa
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] docs: the shape-check row described the pin, not the rebased tree

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
059753f
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] docs: iteration 1 rebuttals, and the e2e re-run that closes the last note

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
3edd244
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] fix: a merge that never ran walks into the same tautology

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
049e497
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] docs: what iteration 2 taught, in the review

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
8a27ffa
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] docs: criterion 9's status now says which reading it is met under

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
cc223f1
chore(porch): 250 implement build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
4b0c6d8
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] docs: iteration 2 consult context

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
fbcb235
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] test: the guard nothing could reach now lives where a test can

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
e4286d1
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] docs: the context now describes the extracted guard and its 5 tests

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
28e18b2
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] fix: my own tests would have failed a correct zero-movement drill

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
2892576
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] docs: iteration 2 rebuttals

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
c643627
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] docs: iteration 2 in the builder thread

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
32ca31c
chore(porch): 250 all plan phases complete → review
pseudoseed
committed
67888a9
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] feat: the contract is regenerated after the rebase, not deferred to the first real one

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
4178aa4
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] docs: the regeneration proof, in the review and the thread

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
9fbf7a1
[Spec 250][Phase: phase_11] docs: the regression row carries the run that backs it

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
d56affe
chore(porch): 250 record PR #266
pseudoseed
committed
d2bff28
chore(porch): 250 acknowledge context refresh
pseudoseed
committed
564c185
[Spec 250][Phase: review] docs: the retrospective the incremental log was not

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
5df1487
chore(porch): 250 review build-complete
pseudoseed
committed
5491afb
[Spec 250][Phase: review] docs: three counts corrected, and where the raw lane outputs actually live

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
173bc23
[Spec 250][Phase: review] fix: the collector test stops writing to the repository it tests

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
99c4690
[Spec 250][Phase: review] docs: which repository each cited path is in, and two counts that read as contradictions

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
6e0a494
[Spec 250][Phase: review] docs: stop stating a branch count that every commit invalidates

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
d8f25e4
[Spec 250][Phase: review] docs: the one red test was my own concurrent commit

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
8be5ea2
chore(porch): 250 pr gate-requested
pseudoseed
committed
bb0ed66
chore(porch): 250 pr gate-request-updated
pseudoseed
committed
da2e89e
[Spec 250][Phase: review] fix: the approval path answers a dead network, the proxy bounds the way back

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
f442cc0
[Spec 250][Phase: review] docs: the e2e re-run at the pin it now describes

pseudoseed
and
claude
committed
8892aa2
chore(porch): 250 pr gate-approved
pseudoseed
committed
c224c6e