Conversation
With modern go testing patterns (e.g.m t.Run(...) and testify) we can express a similar style without depending on an external library with arcane syntax which not all golang developers would be fammiliar with. We were using this particular style only in two packages, so remove it there before it's too late and it spreads. Signed-off-by: Guido Trotter <guido@hudson-trading.com>
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository: prometheus/alertmanager/.coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Advanced Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 8 included reviews per hour; 7 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request replaces Ginkgo/Gomega with Go testing and Testify across Connect API and end-to-end tests. It adds Connect API admission and lifecycle coverage, shared test helpers, sequential e2e harness handling, and removes obsolete dependencies. ChangesTesting framework migration
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 3 (Moderate) | ~30 minutes Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to No actionable merge-blocking risk remains in the test migration. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Full details: Docstring CoverageExplanation Docstring coverage is 71.43% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 14 functions across 7 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
With modern go testing patterns (e.g.m t.Run(...) and testify) we can express a similar style without depending on an external library with arcane syntax which not all golang developers would be fammiliar with.
We were using this particular style only in two packages, so remove it there before it's too late and it spreads.
Pull Request Checklist
Please check all the applicable boxes.
Which user-facing changes does this PR introduce?