-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 190
adding tutorial for spline #987
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: 2.0
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
davepagurek
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One other thought: do we want to include a mention of beziers here for comparison? Maybe something about why you'd want to use one or the other even if we don't explain the whole bezier API?
| @@ -0,0 +1,538 @@ | |||
| --- | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we can rename the file to something like into-to-splines since it's about splines in general than of the single spline() function?
|
|
||
| ### Advanced Spline Shapes and Customization | ||
|
|
||
| So far we've been drawing a single curve segment defined by four points. Now, let's explore more advanced possibilities: creating complex shapes from multiple spline segments, closing splines into continuous loops, and customizing the spline’s properties (like its tightness or endpoint handling) to achieve different effects. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I almost wonder if we should start with beginShape/endShape right after showing a single spline() as the main thing in the tutorial, since I imagine drawing bigger curves and smooth closed curves is a more common use than getting points/tangents along a single segment.
How do you feel about moving this + the closed loop bit up, giving them their own headings (e.g. "Spline Shapes" and "Closed Spline Loops" or something like that?) and then including splinePoint/splineTangent under the advanced section?
|
cool thumbnail for the article btw! |
This is a WIP PR and will try to complete it as soon as possible.