Refresh CLAUDE.md: trim stale sections, add writing style and QA gate - #3963
Merged
Conversation
Drop the mandatory .ai/ read-all list and the hand-kept key-files map (grep beats a stale map). Add a writing-style section (comments as a last resort, plain ASCII, no em dashes) and a quality gate: prove changes in a running app with dash_duo, leave an integration/acceptance test behind, and get a second-model review before handing work back.
|
KoolADE85
approved these changes
Aug 28, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



Summary
CLAUDE.md was written a while back and had drifted. This trims what's gone stale and adds the rules I actually want followed.
Removed
.ai/docs at session start. It never really did, and reading everything up front isn't needed. Replaced with a short pointer: open the.ai/doc that covers what you're touching.Added
dash_duo, leave an integration/acceptance test behind, and run a second-model review of the diff before handing back.Docs only, no code touched.