Skip to content

i18n(ja): fix Load balancer type adjacent-bold-span defect - #23548

Open
yahonda wants to merge 1 commit into
pingcap:i18n-ja-release-8.5from
yahonda:fix-load-balancer-type-adjacent-bold-2026-08-17
Open

i18n(ja): fix Load balancer type adjacent-bold-span defect#23548
yahonda wants to merge 1 commit into
pingcap:i18n-ja-release-8.5from
yahonda:fix-load-balancer-type-adjacent-bold-2026-08-17

Conversation

@yahonda

@yahonda yahonda commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

EN: "Load balancer type: Network, and select the NLB created in the previous step. If the Available load balancers list is empty, wait until the NLB shows the Active state..."

JA had merged Load balancer type and Network into two adjacent **bold** spans with no space between them (part of the deferred adjacent-bold-span defect class), and left Available load balancers partially untranslated. Restored both confirmed English labels; kept アクティブ (Active) as-is, matching the established corpus-wide convention for that status word. Same duplicated paragraph appears twice in the file (AWS and Google Cloud RDS/Aurora sections), fixed both.

Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)

  • master (the latest development version)
  • v8.5 (TiDB 8.5 versions)
  • v8.4 (TiDB 8.4 versions)
  • v8.3 (TiDB 8.3 versions)
  • v8.2 (TiDB 8.2 versions)
  • v8.1 (TiDB 8.1 versions)
  • v7.5 (TiDB 7.5 versions)
  • v7.1 (TiDB 7.1 versions)
  • v6.5 (TiDB 6.5 versions)
  • v6.1 (TiDB 6.1 versions)
  • v5.4 (TiDB 5.4 versions)
  • v5.3 (TiDB 5.3 versions)

What is the related PR or file link(s)?

  • This PR is translated from:
  • Other reference link(s):

Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?

  • Delete files
  • Change aliases
  • Need modification after applied to another branch
  • Might cause conflicts after applied to another branch

…e English labels

EN: "**Load balancer type**: **Network**, and select the NLB created
in the previous step. If the **Available load balancers** list is
empty, wait until the NLB shows the **Active** state..."

JA had merged "Load balancer type" and "Network" into two adjacent
bold spans with no space between them (**...****...**), and left
"Available load balancers" partially untranslated ("利用可能なロードバラン
サーの"). Restored both confirmed English labels; kept アクティブ
(Active) as-is, matching the established corpus-wide convention for
that status word. Same duplicated paragraph appears twice in the file
(AWS and Google Cloud RDS/Aurora sections).
@ti-chi-bot

ti-chi-bot Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign kissmydb for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 2479921e-adc5-4a45-9e1e-5837a2377a1e

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot Bot added missing-translation-status This PR does not have translation status info. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 17, 2026
@qiancai qiancai added translation/no-need No need to translate this PR. and removed missing-translation-status This PR does not have translation status info. labels Aug 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. translation/no-need No need to translate this PR.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants