[murex971]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Bencher Report

Project	PgDog
Branch	having-boolean
Testbed	Intel v1

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Throughput	Benchmark Result operations / second (ops/s) x 1e3 (Result Δ%)	Lower Boundary operations / second (ops/s) x 1e3 (Limit %)	cpu-per-txn	Benchmark Result Measure (units) (Result Δ%)	Upper Boundary Measure (units) (Limit %)
pooler-v3	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	16.99 ops/s x 1e3 (+0.00%) Baseline: 16.99 ops/s x 1e3	16.82 ops/s x 1e3 (99.00%)	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	40.69 units (+0.06%) Baseline: 40.67 units	41.07 units (99.07%)

🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

[github-actions]

Bencher Report

Project	PgDog
Branch	having-boolean
Testbed	Intel v1

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Throughput	Benchmark Result operations / second (ops/s) x 1e3 (Result Δ%)	Lower Boundary operations / second (ops/s) x 1e3 (Limit %)	cpu-per-txn	Benchmark Result Measure (units) (Result Δ%)	Upper Boundary Measure (units) (Limit %)
lb-v3	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	15.99 ops/s x 1e3 (+0.00%) Baseline: 15.99 ops/s x 1e3	15.83 ops/s x 1e3 (99.00%)	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	41.73 units (+0.53%) Baseline: 41.51 units	41.93 units (99.54%)

🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

[github-actions]

Bencher Report

Project	PgDog
Branch	having-boolean
Testbed	Intel v1

Click to view all benchmark results

Benchmark	Throughput	Benchmark Result operations / second (ops/s) x 1e3 (Result Δ%)	Lower Boundary operations / second (ops/s) x 1e3 (Limit %)	cpu-per-txn	Benchmark Result Measure (units) (Result Δ%)	Upper Boundary Measure (units) (Limit %)	ctx-switches-per-txn	Benchmark Result Measure (units) (Result Δ%)	Upper Boundary Measure (units) (Limit %)
sharding-w2-v3	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	10.00 ops/s x 1e3 (-0.00%) Baseline: 10.00 ops/s x 1e3	9.90 ops/s x 1e3 (99.00%)	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	62.33 units (-0.55%) Baseline: 62.68 units	63.30 units (98.47%)	📈 view plot 🚷 view threshold	1.27 units (+0.33%) Baseline: 1.26 units	1.30 units (97.41%)

🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

[github-actions]

Metal bench passed. All 150 measures within bounds.

suite	throughput	cpu/txn	user cycles/txn	user instr/txn	kernel cycles/txn	ctx/txn
pooler		28.4 (-0.9% ± 1.0%)	29,337 (-2.2% ± 1.4%)	35,062 (+0.0% ± 0.02%)	38,591 (+0.0% ± 1.0%)
lb		29.47 (-1.1% ± 1.1%)	31,026 (-1.5% ± 1.5%)	35,926 (+0.1% ± 0.03%)	39,581 (-0.5% ± 1.4%)
sharding-w2		52.68 (-0.8%)	68,077 (-0.3%)	72,269 (-0.0%)	60,782 (-1.3%)	1.405 (-0.0%)
sharding-w8	153,265 (-1.8%)	47.79 (+1.9%)	68,838 (+1.7%)	56,110 (-0.0%)	54,311 (+2.1%)	0.1455 (-1.5%)

Counters per txn

suite	frontend stall	l1i refill	backend stall
pooler	15,625 (-5.3% ± 2.6%)	3,388 (-2.2% ± 1.0%)	2,403 (+7.4% ± 2.2%)
lb	16,794 (-3.9% ± 2.8%)	3,481 (-2.4% ± 1.4%)	2,610 (+6.4% ± 3.4%)
sharding-w2	39,454 (-0.5%)	5,480 (-1.1%)	6,699 (+1.4%)
sharding-w8	40,058 (+2.8%)	5,221 (+3.2%)	8,846 (-1.8%)

Microbench: all 135 measures within bounds.

• simple_cold: 14 of 15 benches slower, median +1.2% ± 0.5%

lb flamegraph vs b17238d

Open interactive for hover, zoom and search.

Open interactive.

microbench flamegraph vs b17238d

Open interactive for hover, zoom and search.

Open interactive.

pooler flamegraph vs b17238d

Open interactive for hover, zoom and search.

Open interactive.

sharding-w2 flamegraph vs b17238d

Open interactive for hover, zoom and search.

Open interactive.

sharding-w8 flamegraph vs b17238d

Open interactive for hover, zoom and search.

Open interactive.

Logs

lb, microbench, pooler, sharding-w2, sharding-w8, verdict.json

Compared c7852b3 with b17238d.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 94.96403% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...frontend/router/parser/rewrite/statement/having.rs	88.52%	7 Missing ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!